There is no question that the migrant invasion of America after the appointment of fraudulent president Joe Biden was a well-planned and orchestrated invasion. Open borders was the policy of Democrats under Obama, with full cooperation by the RINOs. Now that an illegal border border invasion is in progress, the RINOs are simply standing by while America is literally destroyed before our eyes.
What none of the politicians and governors of the border states have done is literally shut down their borders. And they could have done it if they had the courage to do so. The article posted below was posted on World Net Daily (WND). It is there to show people that under the Constitution, the states had every right to shut down their borders and shut down migrant invasion (which is happening purposefully) since the federal government has gone rogue.
PART I
GOVERNMENT GONE ROGUE
Border states: Constitution grants you right to repel illegals
Exclusive: Dr. Wm. Scott Magill applies 'Duality of Protection Principle' to immigration issue
By Wm. Scott Magill
Published March 24, 2021 at 7:07pm
In Part 1 of this column, we looked at increasing government attacks on our Second Amendment in light of a term introduced in that article, the Duality of Protection Principle. This principle is reflected in many Founding Fathers' writings, including our Constitution and the Federalist Papers. It affirms that our federal government has the right and the sacred duty to protect American citizens from state governments gone rogue, while each sovereign state has the same right and duty to protect its own citizens from a federal government gone rogue (i.e., tyrannical).
Constitutional authority for that principle can be derived from the 14th Amendment, which states, "… All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." That is essential for the preservation of both state sovereignty and our individual unalienable rights in the event either our state or federal government implements any degree of tyranny over citizens. States that fail to assert this legal jurisdiction when necessary to protect their citizens' rights, freedoms and liberty against federal tyranny abdicate their sovereignty against the very government they jointly created by ratifying the Constitution.
In today's column, we examine how the Duality of Protection Principle applies to the Biden administration-created invasion of our southern border.
For decades our national government has laid sole claim to protecting our southern border not only against legal immigration (Chy Lung v. Freeman) but also "illegal immigration," more precisely inadmissible aliens. Although American citizens and their states have tacitly accepted this precept, it is a false and unconstitutional usurpation of authority.
Our Constitution, including the 27 amendments, contains 7,591 words, yet without a single mention of immigration in any form. The federal government is the creation of the states. It is the states that give power to the federal government, not vice versa. As James Madison wrote in Federalist 45 and is mirrored in the 10th Amendment: "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite." Furthermore, the Ninth Amendment affirms that save for the federal government's enumerated rights, all other rights are retained by the people (citizens).
Article I, Section 10, Paragraph 4, of the Constitution says, "No State shall … engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay." Merriam Websters Learner's Dictionary defines invasion as 1) the act of entering a place in an attempt to take control of it; 2) the act of entering a place in large numbers, especially in a way that is harmful or unwanted.
By any rational understanding of that definition, our southern border states are experiencing a foreign invasion, and they are in imminent danger. Despite the attempted political-media cover-up, this fact has become evident beyond doubt, exposing U.S. and state citizens to great potential and actual harm. Consequently, all states, especially Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California, are legally and morally compelled to preserve their own sovereignty and their citizens' rights to protection from this foreign invasion.
Many in authority lack the rational understanding to agree with this cogent reality. But as Bob Greenslade of the Tenth Amendment Center once rhetorically asked, "How could the states have the [constitutional] power to engage in war, independent of the federal government, but not have the civil authority to protect their borders?" The self-evident answer: They not only have the authority, but under the Duality of Protection Principle, they have the constitutional and moral obligation to do so.
What none of the politicians and governors of the border states have done is literally shut down their borders. And they could have done it if they had the courage to do so. The article posted below was posted on World Net Daily (WND). It is there to show people that under the Constitution, the states had every right to shut down their borders and shut down migrant invasion (which is happening purposefully) since the federal government has gone rogue.
PART I
GOVERNMENT GONE ROGUE
Border states: Constitution grants you right to repel illegals
Exclusive: Dr. Wm. Scott Magill applies 'Duality of Protection Principle' to immigration issue
By Wm. Scott Magill
Published March 24, 2021 at 7:07pm
In Part 1 of this column, we looked at increasing government attacks on our Second Amendment in light of a term introduced in that article, the Duality of Protection Principle. This principle is reflected in many Founding Fathers' writings, including our Constitution and the Federalist Papers. It affirms that our federal government has the right and the sacred duty to protect American citizens from state governments gone rogue, while each sovereign state has the same right and duty to protect its own citizens from a federal government gone rogue (i.e., tyrannical).
Constitutional authority for that principle can be derived from the 14th Amendment, which states, "… All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." That is essential for the preservation of both state sovereignty and our individual unalienable rights in the event either our state or federal government implements any degree of tyranny over citizens. States that fail to assert this legal jurisdiction when necessary to protect their citizens' rights, freedoms and liberty against federal tyranny abdicate their sovereignty against the very government they jointly created by ratifying the Constitution.
In today's column, we examine how the Duality of Protection Principle applies to the Biden administration-created invasion of our southern border.
For decades our national government has laid sole claim to protecting our southern border not only against legal immigration (Chy Lung v. Freeman) but also "illegal immigration," more precisely inadmissible aliens. Although American citizens and their states have tacitly accepted this precept, it is a false and unconstitutional usurpation of authority.
Our Constitution, including the 27 amendments, contains 7,591 words, yet without a single mention of immigration in any form. The federal government is the creation of the states. It is the states that give power to the federal government, not vice versa. As James Madison wrote in Federalist 45 and is mirrored in the 10th Amendment: "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite." Furthermore, the Ninth Amendment affirms that save for the federal government's enumerated rights, all other rights are retained by the people (citizens).
Article I, Section 10, Paragraph 4, of the Constitution says, "No State shall … engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay." Merriam Websters Learner's Dictionary defines invasion as 1) the act of entering a place in an attempt to take control of it; 2) the act of entering a place in large numbers, especially in a way that is harmful or unwanted.
By any rational understanding of that definition, our southern border states are experiencing a foreign invasion, and they are in imminent danger. Despite the attempted political-media cover-up, this fact has become evident beyond doubt, exposing U.S. and state citizens to great potential and actual harm. Consequently, all states, especially Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California, are legally and morally compelled to preserve their own sovereignty and their citizens' rights to protection from this foreign invasion.
Many in authority lack the rational understanding to agree with this cogent reality. But as Bob Greenslade of the Tenth Amendment Center once rhetorically asked, "How could the states have the [constitutional] power to engage in war, independent of the federal government, but not have the civil authority to protect their borders?" The self-evident answer: They not only have the authority, but under the Duality of Protection Principle, they have the constitutional and moral obligation to do so.
