Mitch Snow Confirmed at Ft Huachuca on Sept 9

[ZNP]

Candace Owens Vindicated; Mitch Snow Confirmed at Ft Huachuca on Sept 9; Why the Cover Ups? - #37

At the moment we have a very strange event that took place at this top secret military base for special ops the day before Charlie Kirk was killed. There is at least one eyewitness account that places the head of security for Charlie Kirk at this meeting at this base, and the brother of one of the key executives for TPUSA was also at the base and detained the eyewitness.

That is about all that I know so far that has been confirmed.

There is one other thing, the eyewitness said a congressman was there but didn't know the name. When shown some pictures he identified the congressman. This person said he left his home state on the 8th (I think it was Nevada, not sure) and was in a 12 hour meeting on the 9th, so couldn't be in the meeting. However, the meeting was at 7:30am (when the eyewitness saw him) and he missed the first two roll calls on that 12 hour meeting, not being marked present until the afternoon, plenty of time to have been in that meeting and then flown back to Washington DC to make the afternoon roll call of that meeting).

What does it mean? Don't know, maybe nothing, but if it means nothing they should have no problem telling us what it means.

Warning: This is a conspiracy theory, if you do not like conspiracy theories, perhaps you are bothered by how many of them have turned out to be true, then avoid this thread.

 

[ZNP]

He claims that there are three people associated with TPUSA and Erika Kirk that we have reason to believe were at Fort Huachuca -- Erika Kirk, Harpool (head of security), and an ex boyfriend of Erika Kirk. All three of these people could eliminate this suspicion by simply providing evidence of their whereabouts on September 8th and 9th. But they have not been transparent.

For example, did they make a purchase in another city? Did they make a phone call? The FBI can examine phones and determine if they were at Fort Huachuca, etc. There are plenty of ways to confirm your whereabouts. For example, posting on this forum provides meta data of my location and time every time I post or click on a link on the computer.

It would not take them any time at all, in fact all they need to do is give permission to the FBI to do the investigation and release the information and these questions could be immediately answered.

BTW, the ex boyfriend of Erika Kirk works for Ben Shapiro and some infer that questioning his whereabouts is what triggered Ben to go postal on CO, Megyn Kelly, and Tucker Carlson.

 

[ZNP]

Dangerous Liberty LIVE - Unmasking Mitch Snow and Candace Owens Charlie Kirk Ft Huachuca Conspiracy

 

[ZNP]

Mitch Snow's son says Fort Huachuca called him on September 9th, so that confirms the official report is legit. (Mitch Snow is the eyewitness). He confirms yes, it was the military police from Fort Huachuca that called him.

 

[SomeDisciple]

This video is LONG; but relevant; so....

 

[AlbertMMartinez]

Candace Owens Vindicated; Mitch Snow Confirmed at Ft Huachuca on Sept 9; Why the Cover Ups? - #37

At the moment we have a very strange event that took place at this top secret military base for special ops the day before Charlie Kirk was killed. There is at least one eyewitness account that places the head of security for Charlie Kirk at this meeting at this base, and the brother of one of the key executives for TPUSA was also at the base and detained the eyewitness.

That is about all that I know so far that has been confirmed.

There is one other thing, the eyewitness said a congressman was there but didn't know the name. When shown some pictures he identified the congressman. This person said he left his home state on the 8th (I think it was Nevada, not sure) and was in a 12 hour meeting on the 9th, so couldn't be in the meeting. However, the meeting was at 7:30am (when the eyewitness saw him) and he missed the first two roll calls on that 12 hour meeting, not being marked present until the afternoon, plenty of time to have been in that meeting and then flown back to Washington DC to make the afternoon roll call of that meeting).

What does it mean? Don't know, maybe nothing, but if it means nothing they should have no problem telling us what it means.

Warning: This is a conspiracy theory, if you do not like conspiracy theories, perhaps you are bothered by how many of them have turned out to be true, then avoid this thread.

Praise God for this opportunity! Thank you for sharing!

 

[Bible_Locket]

Candace Owens Vindicated; Mitch Snow Confirmed at Ft Huachuca on Sept 9; Why the Cover Ups? - #37

At the moment we have a very strange event that took place at this top secret military base for special ops the day before Charlie Kirk was killed. There is at least one eyewitness account that places the head of security for Charlie Kirk at this meeting at this base, and the brother of one of the key executives for TPUSA was also at the base and detained the eyewitness.

That is about all that I know so far that has been confirmed.

There is one other thing, the eyewitness said a congressman was there but didn't know the name. When shown some pictures he identified the congressman. This person said he left his home state on the 8th (I think it was Nevada, not sure) and was in a 12 hour meeting on the 9th, so couldn't be in the meeting. However, the meeting was at 7:30am (when the eyewitness saw him) and he missed the first two roll calls on that 12 hour meeting, not being marked present until the afternoon, plenty of time to have been in that meeting and then flown back to Washington DC to make the afternoon roll call of that meeting).

What does it mean? Don't know, maybe nothing, but if it means nothing they should have no problem telling us what it means.

Warning: This is a conspiracy theory, if you do not like conspiracy theories, perhaps you are bothered by how many of them have turned out to be true, then avoid this thread.

Firstly, Candace Owens is a Sinner,a liar,and a postumus enemy of Charlie,and a present enemy of every member of Charlies surviving family.

Lastly,not a single "Conspiracy Theory" related to the real life fact of Charlie Kirks assassination has ever been proven valid.

Spreading Conspiracy Theories is bearing false witness.

 

[ZNP]

Firstly, Candace Owens is a Sinner,a liar,and a postumus enemy of Charlie,and a present enemy of every member of Charlies surviving family.

Lastly,not a single "Conspiracy Theory" related to the real life fact of Charlie Kirks assassination has ever been proven valid.

Spreading Conspiracy Theories is bearing false witness.

Censorship is an attempt to hold down the truth in unrighteousness. There should not be a rush to judgment, rather every lead should be investigated and anyone who wants to shut down any and all avenues of investigation other than the "official" one is clearly scared of the truth getting out. The truth is not scared of darkness, the truth is a lion, it can defend itself.

We saw this same kind of nasty insults and censorship when they were pushing the vaccine a few years ago. Today the key spokesman pushing that narrative takes the 5th 111 times. That should be a testimony to all that the wheels of justice move slowly but they move towards the truth and darkness is unable to conquer the light.

At that time they said the "conspiracy theories" concerning the vaccine had not been proven. That was backwards. It wasn't our responsibility to prove the vaccine wasn't safe it was the drug companies responsibility to prove that it was safe. Likewise it is not our responsibility or Candace Owen's responsibility to prove her theories correct, it is the prosecutors responsibility to prove they aren't. Instead of saying "no conspiracy theory has been proven valid" the point is whether or not they have been proven invalid.

 

[ZNP]

Our first amendment right to free speech is not to protect speech that the government agrees with. It isn't about protecting the "official narrative". It is there to protect speech that the government doesn't agree with, doesn't like, and it is there because it is the single most important protection against tyranny and the government getting away with murder.

That doesn't mean that every "conspiracy theory" is correct, many may be wrong and hopefully the vast majority are. However, when the conspiracy theorists start batting 1,000 you know that their is a war with a few faithful people holding the line against tyranny taking over.

 

[Bible_Locket]

There's no reasoning with someone who doesn't know a conspiracy theory is not fact.

And certainly the first amendment guarantees the right to spread lies. And insist long debunked conspiracy theories are still true!

That says everything about those who freely do that.

Owens is a purveyor of slander.

She's being sued by French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, for insisting Brigitte is a man.

And she's soon to answer for her antisemiticism,with regard to her Charlie Kirk assassination slander.

Beware those who defend evil as a right.

 

[AlbertMMartinez]

Censorship is an attempt to hold down the truth in unrighteousness. There should not be a rush to judgment, rather every lead should be investigated and anyone who wants to shut down any and all avenues of investigation other than the "official" one is clearly scared of the truth getting out. The truth is not scared of darkness, the truth is a lion, it can defend itself.

We saw this same kind of nasty insults and censorship when they were pushing the vaccine a few years ago. Today the key spokesman pushing that narrative takes the 5th 111 times. That should be a testimony to all that the wheels of justice move slowly but they move towards the truth and darkness is unable to conquer the light war the knights

At that time they said the "conspiracy theories" concerning the vaccine had not been proven. That was backwards. It wasn't our responsibility to prove the vaccine wasn't safe it was the drug companies responsibility to prove that it was safe. Likewise it is not our responsibility or Candace Owen's responsibility to prove her theories correct, it is the prosecutors responsibility to prove they aren't. Instead of saying "no conspiracy theory has been proven valid" the point is whether or not they have been proven invalid.

Great! I agree in your post

 

[Charlesiii]

Here are just some of the lies told by the shills to date, who are trying to convict a man who should be considered innocent until proven guilty, in order that the real murderers can go free. In Old Testament times, false witnesses would suffer the same fate at the one they were attempting to condemn. Courtesy of Candace Owen's latest.

 

[SomeDisciple]

Ignoring the fact that this was an awkward necro immediately followed by a trashpost....

The Ft. Huachuca lead just kind of fizzled out, didnt it? I suppose that's to be expected. Military bases are mostly, relatively secure locations; so, even if he really did see something he wasnt supposed to see, there still isnt likely much else to verify it.

This bit about Mitch Snow was also part of my dreams that I have posted about on the dreams/visions thread. IIRC, (in the dream) he eventually came out and apologized, and said the main reason he brought his story to Candace was to amplify his own story (which, I dont even remember, something about his former military unit or something.) But as I've noted while the big-picture events in these dreams have happened, many of the details do not happen or happen differently- which has turned out to be a good thing so far.

 

[Charlesiii]

In my opinion, those thinking the Ft. Huachuca thing is over have a very short attention span. We're talking about a world-wide crime network, involved in the most heinous and satanic crimes, which would hide behind even a world war to cover it up. It's not going to be ended in a few weeks. Give the liars time to lie, the naive time to believe them and to mock, and then the lies will be exposed. That's the necessary cycle to teach people not to believe things just 'cause they saw it on a screen.

Obvious and overt criminals like Fauci are only now being openly exposed, after 5 years, so the more embedded ones are obviously gonna take longer.

 

[Charlesiii]

For those who haven't seen it, there was a fun music video posted some months back about the Fort Huachuca thing. It does contain some "boobily" clad AI dancing ladies who could be distracting to some given their body shapes, and probably should have worn shirts over their beach wear (which got me a scolding from someone for not mentioning upfront last time), but I particularly liked the middle part, where it shows the conspiracy will be exposed by the audit (the DOGE) - who paid for whom, and where did the money go. I think this is the bit we're up to.

 

[SomeDisciple]

In my opinion, those thinking the Ft. Huachuca thing is over have a very short attention span. We're talking about a world-wide crime network, involved in the most heinous and satanic crimes, which would hide behind even a world war to cover it up. It's not going to be ended in a few weeks. Give the liars time to lie, the naive time to believe them and to mock, and then the lies will be exposed. That's the necessary cycle to teach people not to believe things just 'cause they saw it on a screen.

Obvious and overt criminals like Fauci are only now being openly exposed, after 5 years, so the more embedded ones are obviously gonna take longer.

Bro. It's been several months now- the OP is from dec. 2025. With this Ft. Huachuca thing there are barely any dots to connect- at least that are known publicly. They don't even need to make up a complicated lie; because military officers and security contractors having a meeting on a military base is not something that reasonably draws serious suspicion- and they don't have to lie if nobody can even make them answer a question. At this point there isn't even a way to make them talk.

 

[Charlesiii]

Bro. It's been several months now- the OP is from dec. 2025. With this Ft. Huachuca thing there are barely any dots to connect- at least that are known publicly. They don't even need to make up a complicated lie; because military officers and security contractors having a meeting on a military base is not something that reasonably draws serious suspicion- and they don't have to lie if nobody can even make them answer a question. At this point there isn't even a way to make them talk.

This is what I mean. Charlie Kirk was assassinated last year, and the alleged suspect is still in gaol despite the minimal evidence against him (rather than any official investigation of the wider group of potential conspirators and evidence, which is compelling). If there exists that level of (rather than corruption, for the sake of charity, I'll call it) incompetence at the FBI, how much moreso elsewhere where the wickedness is not directly in the spotlight?

The Fort Huachuca link will be reintroduced - just probably not next week or the week after when those raised on a TV series lifestyle might expect it will.

 

[ZNP]

There's no reasoning with someone who doesn't know a conspiracy theory is not fact.

And certainly the first amendment guarantees the right to spread lies. And insist long debunked conspiracy theories are still true!

That says everything about those who freely do that.

Owens is a purveyor of slander.

She's being sued by French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, for insisting Brigitte is a man.

And she's soon to answer for her antisemiticism,with regard to her Charlie Kirk assassination slander.

Beware those who defend evil as a right.

Piers Morgan LOSES $100K Bet w/Candace Owens Over Brigitte Macron’s Gender!​

Did you follow up on this post and note that she was cleared of defamation for saying Brigette is a man and you saying she is a purveyor of slander for saying it is in fact libelous?

 

[ZNP]

Piers Morgan LOSES $100K Bet w/Candace Owens Over Brigitte Macron’s Gender!​

Did you follow up on this post and note that she was cleared of defamation for saying Brigette is a man and you saying she is a purveyor of slander for saying it is in fact libelous?

It turns out this story is a year old and since then Brigitte has filed a defamation suit against Candace in the US. So this has not been resolved as far as Candace is concerned.

Generally in the US you are considered innocent until proven guilty, so accusing CO of being guilty is hasty and unreasonable based on the standard we keep in the US.

That said it is incredible to me that this debate has been going on this long. It would take a week to do a cheek swab and a DNA analysis. That would resolve the issue fully.

CO has said she believes that Brigitte is a trans woman, so it doesn't change the fact if her claim is that despite her DNA she is a woman, that is the same thing that CO is saying. So then, why not resolve this simply rather than drag it out for years?

 

[Bible_Locket]

January 2026
Brigitte Macron won her defamation case in France. Can she repeat in the US?

Candace Owens Disputes Delaware Ties in Macron Defamation Case​

July 27, 2026,
The case is Macron v. Owens, Del. Super. Ct., No. N25C-07-194, hearing 7/27/26.


Docket Report Results *not an official site*



State of Delaware
What happens now when judge hasn't made a decision and it is september 7

As of September 7, 2026, the judge has not publicly entered a ruling on Candace Owens’s motion to dismiss. The Delaware docket still says “Decision is reserved.”
State of Delaware

That means:

The judge is still considering the written briefs and arguments.
The lawsuit remains active; it has not been dismissed and has not yet gone to trial.
The judge could dismiss some or all claims, deny the motion, or allow part of the case to proceed while dismissing other claims.
If the motion is denied, the case will generally move into discovery and other pretrial proceedings.
If it is granted, the judge’s order should explain whether the case ends or whether the Macrons can amend their complaint or continue against particular defendants.
A delayed ruling does not automatically mean either side has won. Courts can take weeks or months, particularly when the motion involves jurisdiction, choice of law, and statute-of-limitations issues.
The next meaningful development should be a written order from Judge Sheldon K. Rennie—or a new scheduling order or filing by the parties. The docket currently identifies the matter as a jury-trial case but does not show a trial date.

State of Delaware