Monsanto. Is there a worse company out there? Maybe, but probably not.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

JosephsDreams

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2015
4,313
468
83
#1
From the Food Babes .com site

Here are some emails that the govt has released from / to Monsanto from various govt officials, etc.

[FONT=&quot]Monsanto was in private talks with a top official at the EPA, Jess Rowland, who was in charge of evaluating the cancer risk of glyphosate for the EPA. Rowland was allegedly helping them stop another federal agency from investigating whether glyphosate causes cancer and told a Monsanto employee, [/FONT][FONT=&quot]“If I can kill this I should get a medal”[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. Rowland also signed off on the mysteriously leaked and deleted EPA memo [/FONT][FONT=&quot]which found glyphosate “not likely to be carcinogenic to humans”, which Monsanto touted as proof the EPA finds it safe

[/FONT]

  • Long-term EPA toxicologist Marion Copley accused EPA’s Rowland of playing“political conniving games with the science” and making decisions based on his “bonus” in favoring pesticide makers (such as Monsanto). Dr. Copley went on to allude that other EPA staff have conflicts of interest and may be taking bribes. She asserts that Anna Lowit (still at the EPA) intimidated staff to change their findings to favor the industry. Dr. Copley also stated, “It is essentially certain that glyphosate causes cancer.”



  • A Monsanto employee proposed they could “ghost-write” portions of a scientific report and then just have hired scientists “sign their names so to speak”. The EPA would later use this report evaluate the safety of glyphosate. The reason they would do this is highly unethical – to make the report appear to have been prepared by independent scientists, when in reality Monsanto wrote it! This begs the question, how often do they do this? An email suggests they ghostwrote this report presented to EPA regulators in 2000, although no Monsanto employees are listed as authors.

  • Way back in 1999, Monsanto buried the findings of their own scientist (Dr. James Parry) who found glyphosate is genotoxic and recommended further testing. Internal emails show that Monsanto employees questioned whether Parry had “ever worked with industry before”, “hoped that it didn’t cost too much” and that they should hire a different expert who would be “influential with regulators” and help them with “outreach” efforts. Ha! They only want to hire scientists who will make findings in their favor to deceive our regulators.



  • Monsanto knows other compounds in Roundup such as NNG and 1, 4 Dioxane are toxic and can cause cancer as they acknowledged this with each other in emails mentioned in court docs: “If you talk to Kerry [Liefer, an EPA employee], I wouldn’t push the NNG issue too hard — don’t want to draw attention to the toxicity of our product”.



  • And it goes on and on.
I think drug lords and mafioso have more ethics than these guys. They have certainly done less damage to society than them.
 

JosephsDreams

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2015
4,313
468
83
#2
And this from California.

California lists Roundup ingredient as a chemical linked to cancer; Monsanto vows to fight - LA Times

The main ingredient of the pesticide Roundup will be added to a list of chemicals that California believes are linked to cancer, and products that contain the compound will have to carry a warning label by next year.
That designation under the state’s Proposition 65 rules won’t keep the chemical, glyphosate, off fields or garden store shelves. That’s because the proposition does not set rules on how chemicals are used. It just requires a warning that ingredients are “known to the state of California to cause cancer and birth defects and other reproductive harm.”
Federal and state officials who can restrict or ban pesticides so far have said the chemical, one of the most widely used weed killers, has low toxicity and can safely be sprayed on food crops, gardens, parks and golf courses if users follow instructions.
Last year the federal Environmental Protection Agency decided glyphosate was not a carcinogen, setting off howls of protest from advocacy groups, and shifting their long-running battle with Monsanto to California.

The acute animosity toward Monsanto stems from the company’s marketing of seeds that have been genetically modified to withstand its patented Roundup herbicide, uniting the two bete noirs of the environmental and food safety movements — agrochemicals and genetically modified organisms.
Glyphosate is sprayed on more than 200 crops across 4 million acres in California, including 1.5 million acres of almonds, making it the most widely used herbicide, according to the state Department of Pesticide Regulation, a branch of the state EPA.
School districts in Burbank, Irvine and Glendale have banned the chemical from their properties.
The state Environmental Protection Agency began the process of requiring the warning label nearly two years ago, but Monsanto sued.

The company, which is soon to be absorbed into agrochemical giant Bayer, accused the state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, a branch of the state EPA, of “cherry-picking” the science to justify the warning label. A state Superior Court judge ruled against the company in March, clearing a path for Monday’s decision.
“California’s decision makes it the national leader in protecting people from cancer-causing pesticides,” said Nathan Donley, a senior scientist at the Center for Biological Diversity, one of the groups that has pushed to ban glyphosate. “The U.S. EPA now needs to step up and acknowledge that the world’s most transparent and science-based assessment has linked glyphosate to cancer.”
Donley was referring to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the World Health Organization. Critics say that agency focused on the hazard posed at any dosage, rather than on risks associated with the kind of exposure that would be expected on farms and in gardens.
A Monsanto spokesman said the company “will continue to aggressively challenge” the court decision.
 

Maka

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2017
505
18
0
#3
I think drug lords and mafioso have more ethics than these guys. They have certainly done less damage to society than them.
^I agree! This company is pure evil.

Thank you for the information.
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#4
If Bayer is trying to take over this Monsanto, maybe it's worse.
 

shittim

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2016
14,526
8,251
113
#5
Bayer is the company that brought Zyklon B to the world for use in the deathcamps.
 

shittim

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2016
14,526
8,251
113
#6
Bayer is the company that brought Zyklon B to the world for use in the deathcamps.
 

JosephsDreams

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2015
4,313
468
83
#7
Yeah, I know. I heard about that years ago and was stunned. I must be naive. They and Monsanto make great dancing partners.
 

Maka

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2017
505
18
0
#8
Has anyone watched Bitter seeds? It's a documentary about the effects of GMO's on India's farmers. It's heartbreaking, how anyone could care so little about human life is beyond me.
 
Feb 28, 2016
11,311
2,976
113
#9
beyond you, dear Maka,

but not satan, and those who serve him for filthy lucre and demonic power
for the destruction of the world...
 

shittim

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2016
14,526
8,251
113
#13
aspirin as well, lost the contract for Zyklon B after the war. Imagine that, ha!