i live in a city that has a liberal dem. city council and most of the city/county gov. is liberal.
guess what i got in the mail today?
a application to for mail in ballots.
did i request it? no. it just showed up.
other people got the same thing without asking for it.
unless the mail in ballot situation is under control, the dems will continue to steal elections..
Oh Darn, I was just about to 'Like' your post and then I came to you last statement... hahahaha
lol, it's funny because it's literally like a broken record in here...
lol, YES, EVERYONE KNOWS that the ONLY WAY they can win is to try to CHEAT!!!
lol, YES, and we know this very well and this is all a part of the Greatest STONG OPERATION in the History of the World...
As I have said soooo many times....
These November Elections will be PROTECTED Before, During and Afterwards...
Meaning, as it pertains to any STING OPERATION they have to be CAUGHT in the ACT of their CRIMES!!!
GOAL-LINE DEFENSE - 11th Hour EO's for Save America Act and Insurrection Act...
All has to be done in accordance with the Rule of Law and Law of War...
The Military is the ONLY WAY - if they insist on making things UGLY!!!
"𝐒𝐂𝐇𝐔𝐌𝐄𝐑 𝐏𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐂𝐒 𝐀𝐅𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐒𝐂𝐎𝐓𝐔𝐒 𝟔-𝟑 𝐔𝐏𝐇𝐎𝐋𝐃𝐒 𝐃𝐎𝐆𝐄'𝐒 𝐕𝐎𝐓𝐄𝐑-𝐑𝐎𝐋𝐋 𝐏𝐔𝐑𝐆𝐄—𝐂𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐒 𝐈𝐓 '𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍-𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐆𝐈𝐍𝐆'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Friday that the Trump administration can keep using the revamped SAVE database to check voter rolls for noncitizens ahead of the midterms. Sen. Chuck Schumer's response wasn't relief that illegal votes get caught — it was panic that the tool works.
“𝘌𝘭𝘰𝘯 𝘔𝘶𝘴𝘬'𝘴 𝘋𝘖𝘎𝘌-𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘩𝘢𝘶𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘚𝘈𝘝𝘌 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳𝘴. 𝘞𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘸𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘰𝘯,” Schumer wrote on X, accusing the Court of "𝐩𝐮𝐭𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐛 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐞" for what he called "Trump's election-rigging agenda."
Here's what Schumer left out: DOGE spent two weeks in early 2025 cleaning up SAVE — a database that exists for one job, confirming citizenship. Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson dissented; six other justices, across the ideological spectrum of the current Court, didn't see the constitutional crisis Schumer is describing.
Former Arizona election chief Stephen Richer, a Republican, called SAVE a "𝐰𝐢𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧'𝐬 𝐯𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐬" when used responsibly. Even the left-leaning Center for Election Innovation and Research's David Becker admitted it's a useful tool — it's voluntary for states to use, not a purge machine.
A database that only flags noncitizens should only worry the people counting on noncitizens to vote.
𝐀 𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐧 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐟𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐚 𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤.
The Trump administration (second term, beginning January 2025) and the Supreme Court have taken multiple actions framed as protecting election integrity, primarily focused on citizenship verification, limiting noncitizen voting, tightening mail ballot processes, and related enforcement. Many face ongoing litigation, with mixed court outcomes. Key developments as of late September 2026 include the following.
Trump Administration Actions
Executive Order 14248 (March 25, 2025) — “Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections”:
Directed the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship on the national mail voter registration form; expanded state access to federal databases for verifying citizenship/immigration status of registrants; instructed agencies to compare state voter rolls against immigration records; prioritized enforcement against noncitizens registering or voting; and sought to enforce federal law requiring ballots received by Election Day (limiting post-Election Day acceptance of mail/absentee ballots in some contexts).
Significant portions were blocked by federal courts (e.g., permanent injunction on the proof-of-citizenship form requirement; challenges in cases such as
LULAC v. Executive Office of the President,
California v. Trump, and others).
Executive Order 14399 (March 31, 2026) — “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections”:
Directed DHS (via USCIS) and the Social Security Administration to compile and transmit “State Citizenship Lists” of confirmed adult U.S. citizens (drawn from federal records) to state election officials at least 60 days before federal elections; prioritized investigations and prosecutions related to election fraud and noncitizen voting; and ordered the U.S. Postal Service to initiate rulemaking on mail/absentee ballot handling, including standards tied to eligibility verification.
USPS published a final rule in August 2026 implementing aspects of this (e.g., requirements related to ballot delivery). Parts of the EO and rule have been enjoined or limited by lower courts; litigation continues.
Other enforcement and operational steps:
- Department of Justice (DOJ) demanded detailed voter registration lists from numerous states (and sued some for compliance), citing National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), Help America Vote Act, and related authorities; multiple courts rejected or limited these demands.
- DHS modified the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system to facilitate bulk or individualized citizenship checks of voter rolls and conditioned certain homeland security grants on states using SAVE or related verification.
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) initially scaled back election security support, then issued a midterms-focused plan (“Securing the Next 250”) in September 2026 offering voluntary services such as vulnerability scanning and penetration testing.
- Additional steps included FBI seizure of 2020 election materials in Fulton County, Georgia; warnings to states about potential noncitizens on rolls; and removal of EAC commissioners (leaving the agency without a quorum at points).
These measures emphasize preventing noncitizen voting (already illegal under federal law) and strengthening verification, though noncitizen voting remains rare according to available data, and critics argue the actions risk suppressing eligible voters or exceeding presidential authority over state-administered elections.
Supreme Court Actions
September 25, 2026: The Court (in an unsigned emergency order, with liberal justices dissenting) stayed a lower-court injunction, clearing the way for the Trump administration’s modified SAVE system to be used for voter citizenship verification. It emphasized the federal government’s role in responding to state requests and noted limitations on mass purges close to Election Day under the NVRA’s 90-day quiet period (which began in early August 2026 for the November midterms). Impact on the immediate election is expected to be limited to individualized checks.
September 14, 2026: The Court denied the administration’s request to stay a lower-court injunction blocking key parts of the USPS mail-ballot rule tied to EO 14399, leaving the rule largely blocked for the midterms.
June 29, 2026 (Watson v. Republican National Committee): The Court upheld state practices allowing acceptance of mail ballots postmarked by Election Day but arriving afterward (rejecting a Republican-led challenge).
April 29, 2026 (Louisiana v. Callais): In a 6-3 decision, the Court narrowed Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, holding that Louisiana’s creation of an additional majority-Black congressional district constituted an unconstitutional racial gerrymander (because the VRA did not require it). This affects redistricting standards and has influenced map-drawing in other states.
Other relevant rulings include upholding broad birthright citizenship (rejecting a Trump executive order limiting it) and various redistricting and campaign-finance decisions that reshaped the electoral landscape.
In summary, the administration has prioritized citizenship verification, database access, enforcement against alleged noncitizen voting, and tighter mail-ballot rules via executive orders and agency actions. SCOTUS has enabled the SAVE verification tool while blocking or limiting certain mail-ballot restrictions and significantly altering Voting Rights Act redistricting standards. Many administration initiatives remain contested in lower courts, with the November 2026 midterms serving as a practical test of the resulting framework.