T
Tintin
Guest
Christianity could be considered eastern mysticism too.
![]()
Eastern? The Holy Land is to the West.
Christianity could be considered eastern mysticism too.
![]()
Eastern? The Holy Land is to the West.
Comparisons are not analogies.
Ok...we can use the group that still believes that man has never walked on the moon.
Interesting thing here, is that the same technology that put man on the moon in the first place, states that the Universe is billions of years old....and any sane person knows that we have put a man on the moon.
YEC is going the way of T-Rex...
What is amazing is that people decide on the existence of God based on whether God breathed scripture giving a time schedule and description of how He did it in the bible. We have established that the bible tells of the existence of earth before he counted the seven days.
It is even explained to us in Hebrew about the first and fourth day of creation God gave you with the Hebrew words Owr, choshek for the first day and when he created light the Hebrew words are maorot and layil. You have Hebrew dictionaries for you have the net.
If you want to learn about what man can figure out about all this, go to science. If you want to learn about the principles of God, go to scripture. But don't try to make scripture a scientific manual, it isn't.
Most of those who say that the earth is 6,000 years old don't get it from scientific evidence.
They get it from Bishop Ussher, who died in 1656.
Most of those who say that the earth is 6,000 years old don't get it from scientific evidence.
They get it from Bishop Ussher, who died in 1656.
A no, the word Yom designates a 24 hour day and the text says there was morning and evening further indicating it was a 24 hour day.
There was no correspondence in their grammatical construction.Look Einstein, you're wrong.Elin said:Grocery bills also add up, but they don't ever become money growing on trees.Esanta said:No, not one instance of adaptation. But they add up.Elin said:Adaptation is not evolution of one species into another.
"Comparisons" are not "analogies."
analogy
əˈnalədʒi/
noun
noun: analogy; plural noun: analogies
- a comparison between one thing and another, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
"an analogy between the workings of nature and those of human societies"
- a correspondence or partial similarity.
"the syndrome is called deep dysgraphia because of its analogy to deep dyslexia"- a thing which is comparable to something else in significant respects.
"works of art were seen as an analogy for works of nature"- LOGIC
a process of arguing from similarity in known respects to similarity in other respects.
I mentioned the culmination of biological mutations and how
when they add up they lead to significant changes in species,
And you missed my analogy.and you tried to analogize it by saying 'grocery bills add up, but they certainly don't become money growing on trees'.
And that is the analogy. . .sorry you missed it.1. Grocery bills are not analogous to biological mutations, in any way relevant to this argument whatsoever.
2. Grocery bills would never add up to money, if anything they'd add up to a lack of money.
3. Grocery bills and money are in no way comparable to genetic mutation and evolution.
Like I had to explain to you why mine was an analogy. . .of a conclusion unrelated to the premise.If I literally have to explain to you why this is an analogy,
And so we're back to the God-man and Scripture:and why it is an absolutely terrible, flawed, horribly irrelevant and nonsensical one, then I really don't think you're qualified for this argument.
Nor does Scripture say "Do not abort unborn children," or "God is sovereign" or "God is triune."Agreed....and scripture never says to sum the generations to arrive at a date, that is a human idea...
All of God's Word is true, including any science which it contains.What is amazing is that people decide on the existence of God based on whether God breathed scripture giving a time schedule and description of how He did it in the bible. We have established that the bible tells of the existence of earth before he counted the seven days.
It is even explained to us in Hebrew about the first and fourth day of creation God gave you with the Hebrew words Owr, choshek for the first day and when he created light the Hebrew words are maorot and layil. You have Hebrew dictionaries for you have the net.
If you want to learn about what man can figure out about all this, go to science. If you want to learn about the principles of God, go to scripture. But don't try to make scripture a scientific manual, it isn't.
Correct. . .there was only one evening in any day.A Hebrew day is from evening to evening.
Incorrect. . .that's with your line of reasoning.Thus, when the text states 'and there was evening and there was morning', this must either be either 12hrs, or something less than 24hrs, with this line of reasoning...
Because God created all that science is trying to find out, and God as the creator knows more science than all men, and because all scripture is true, does that mean to you that you must read scripture as a manual in science? Do you actually think that science is what scripture is given to us for?All of God's Word is true, including any science which it contains.
The Author of science is not mistaken regarding it.
Scripture was given to us for truth, on whatever and all it reveals.Because God created all that science is trying to find out, and God as the creator knows more science than all men, and because all scripture is true, does that mean to you that you must read scripture as a manual in science? Do you actually think that science is what scripture is given to us for?
Do you feel that you can look to science to determine your belief in God?Scripture was given to us for truth, on whatever and all it reveals.
It means to me that whatever Scripture reports about science is true.
It does not mean that Scripture answers all questions about science, as does a manual.
I am not in the business of accommodating Scripture to science.
I am in the business of accommodating science to Scripture.
A Hebrew day is from evening to evening.
Thus, when the text states 'and there was evening and there was morning', this must either be either 12hrs, or something less than 24hrs, with this line of reasoning...
A certain little thing called a global flood might of course make it difficult to find many of your " missing" fossils anyway!
The blue text means I do not.Do you feel that you can look to science to determine your belief in God?Elin said:Scripture was given to us for truth, on whatever and all it reveals.
It means to me that whatever Scripture reports about science is true.
It does not mean that Scripture answers all questions about science, as does a manual.
I am not in the business of accommodating (adjusting) Scripture to "science."
I am in the business of accommodating (adjusting) "science" to Scripture.