Obama Reaffirms ‘Deep Commitment’ to Abortion as Thousands March for Life in US

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

G4JC

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2011
668
6
0
WASHINGTON – Barack Obama reaffirmed his “deep commitment” to abortion on Thursday despite the throng of thousands that gathered in the nation’s capital for the annual March for Life marking the 42nd “anniversary” of the Supreme Court ruling of Roe v. Wade. “Forty-two years ago today, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Roe v. Wade, a decision that protects a woman’s freedom to make her own choices about her body and her health, and reaffirms a fundamental American value: that government should not intrude in our most private and personal family matters,” Obama wrote in an official statement.
“I am deeply committed to protecting this core constitutional right,” he continued. “The federal government should not be injecting itself into decisions best made between women, their families, and their doctors.”
As in years past, Obama also commented that he is “deeply committed to continuing our work to reduce unintended pregnancies, support maternal and child health, promote adoptions, and minimize the need for abortion.” But he stated that he ultimately wanted women to have equality with men.

Ym1vrzi.jpg


“Today, as we reflect on this critical moment in our history, may we all rededicate ourselves to ensuring that our daughters have the same rights, freedoms, and opportunities as our sons,” Obama said.
In the meantime, tens of thousands of Americans took to the National Mall in Washington for the annual March for Life, an event that attracts pro-life citizens from across America. In addition to the traditional march to the Supreme Court, participants gathered to listen to speeches from a number of pro-life figures, including Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) and Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC). Some carried signs and some chanted slogans such as, “Roe v. Wade has got to go.”
While some pro-life Christians skipped the event due to its ecumenical nature, a small group of abortion advocates were present to counter the march, bearing signs that read “Abortion on demand and without apology.” Several were arrested, being taken away in handcuffs.

This year, some of the marchers expressed frustration with Congress after it decided to scrap the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would have ended abortion after 20 weeks. Some female lawmakers had expressed opposition to the measure, including those who are Republican, mainly due to its requirement that women who seek an abortion following rape report the criminal act.

But while some thought the bill was too strict, others didn’t think it went far enough as it left exceptions.
“When we say that a child can feel pain at 20 weeks and that we should not kill them, tear their arms and legs off, why would we make an exemption for anyone at 20 weeks?” Monica Kelsey, a member of the group Living Exceptions, a coalition of women who were conceived by rape, told U.S. News & World Report. “They’re negating their original argument.”
“[It was] one of the most disappointing moments of my life,” said Sen. Trent Franks (R-Ariz), the main sponsor of the bill, after learning that it would not be moving forward in Congress at this time.

As previously reported, the Supreme Court ruling of Roe v. Wade was decided on January 22, 1973, and was handed down by a Republican majority. Out of the seven justices that ruled in favor of Roe, a case that dealt with an admitted false claim of rape, five were Republicans. Judge Harry Blackmun, nominated by Richard Nixon, wrote the majority opinion.
“The Constitution does not define ‘person’ in so many words,” he wrote. “n nearly all these instances [where it is cited], the use of the word is such that it has application only post-natally. None indicates, with any assurance, that it has any possible pre-natal application. … In short, the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense.”
However, he noted that if it could be proven that unborn babies truly are persons, abortion could come to an end in America.
Source: Obama Reaffirms ‘Deep Commitment’ to Abortion as Thousands March for Life in U.S. Capital | Christian News Network
Reddit: Obama Reaffirms ‘Deep Commitment’ to Abortion as Thousands March for Life in U.S. Capital : ChristianNews
 
Re: Obama Reaffirms ‘Deep Commitment’ to Abortion as Thousands March for Life in US

Another nail in the coffin and another ring in the death knell of the U.S.
 
Re: Obama Reaffirms ‘Deep Commitment’ to Abortion as Thousands March for Life in US

Week ten is when a child essentially stops being a zygote and begins to form functioning nervous systems, self sufficient organ systems and other manner of functions that render it, essentially ''human'' in the most fundamental sense of the word, so if abortion must be given as an alternative choice to bearing a child then this is the moral cut-off point for which ''pregnancy on demand' should be given. As far as pregnancy in regards to underage sex, or instances where the woman is not of full mental capacity, the cut-off point should really be at around 16-20 weeks when foetuses begin to respond to stimuli. As for rape, I think current cut-off limits are sufficient.

New studies suggest that babies can't actually feel pain inside the womb, however, other studies suggest this begins to happen at between 20-22 weeks, and so it would be advisable in pregnancies over 22 weeks to give the foetus pain relief if abortion must be carried out.

As for the moral implications, I think that to the extent that a baby is not autonomous (still techincally ''part of the mother''), which is up to 22 weeks, abortion is not an absolute moral negative. After that period, the question gets a lot more difficult to answer.

IN the case of rape specifically, I see little difference between forcing a rape victim to undergo the mental and physical suffering of such a pregnancy and of giving birth, and allowing that woman to terminate her pregnancy. I think both are morally ambiguous and should be left up to the mother herself.