Obama's Sexist Race-Favoring Campaign Strategy Indications

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
1

1still_waters

Guest
#1
#1
Many indications from Obama's campaign lead many to conclude he is campaigning in a very sexist and race-favoring way.

During his campaign speeches in front of the camera, it's been noted that there are usually a disproportionation amount of women, or people of a given skin color behind him. These speeches are photo opportunities where the people standing behind him reflect the kinds of people he is trying to reach.

Many believe it's quite clear that Obama is intentionally excluding people based on skin color and sex.

Link-->Obama campaign positions minorities, women behind president at most rallies | The Daily Caller
 
Bookends

Bookends

Senior Member
#2
Aug 28, 2012
4,225
99
48
#2
1still_waters said:
Many indications from Obama's campaign lead many to conclude he is campaigning in a very sexist and race-favoring way.

During his campaign speeches in front of the camera, it's been noted that there are usually a disproportionation amount of women, or people of a given skin color behind him. These speeches are photo opportunities where the people standing behind him reflect the kinds of people he is trying to reach.

Many believe it's quite clear that Obama is intentionally excluding people based on skin color and sex.

Link-->Obama campaign positions minorities, women behind president at most rallies | The Daily Caller
Click to expand...
I'd like to see the comparison of Pres. Obama's and Romney's backdrop.

Just want be fair and balanced. :)

romney backdrop.jpg

romoney backdrop 2.jpg

romoney backdrop 3.jpg

romoney backdrop 4.jpg

romoney backdrop 5.jpg

romoney backdrop 6.jpg

You decide!
 
Bookends

Bookends

Senior Member
#4
Aug 28, 2012
4,225
99
48
#4
1still_waters said:
There is more intent behind Obama's background "organizing" than Mitt's.
Click to expand...
Yah, that's quite apparent. That's why I provided the contrast. It just compliments your op and emboldens it.
 
Nautilus

Nautilus

Senior Member
#6
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#6
This has become hilariously immature between celeste and still at this point i think now it seems thay are just fighting one on another to have more post anti-their views than the other...
 
O

OFM

Guest
#9
#9
1still_waters said:
Many indications from Obama's campaign lead many to conclude he is campaigning in a very sexist and race-favoring way.

During his campaign speeches in front of the camera, it's been noted that there are usually a disproportionation amount of women, or people of a given skin color behind him. These speeches are photo opportunities where the people standing behind him reflect the kinds of people he is trying to reach.

Many believe it's quite clear that Obama is intentionally excluding people based on skin color and sex.

Link-->Obama campaign positions minorities, women behind president at most rallies | The Daily Caller
Click to expand...
He Is Not Doing This At All He would not Do This any Thing at All-this way

Willard Romney is still supporting a Senate Canidate who supports Rape,if the women gets pregnant says its .o.k. cause it was Gods Way of Conciving the CHILD.
thats 2 republicans supporting Rape as o.k. see they are like communist and the the evil world war german
poltitcal parties.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#10
#10
Nautilus said:
This has become hilariously immature between celeste and still at this point i think now it seems thay are just fighting one on another to have more post anti-their views than the other...
Click to expand...
Just giving a lil balance my friend. :)
 
T

tapuout101

Guest
#11
#11
Does people realise that Romney is a Morman Bishop? I wouldn't think Woman would take to the polygamy type relationship. I see a lot of TV preachers doing most of their sermon on politics. I even emailed a couple telling them we follow GOD not Rep. or Dem. If a Rep. or Dem. is the answer why is our world going down faster than ever? They can't fix it because they are not GOD. We need to be real about money and power. Churches give huge contributions to politics mostly the Rep. party supposing to be better. The drug companies give huge contributions to politics to push their drugs. Drug companies are corperations with their ONLY goal is to make money. Why have we not had a cure in a hundred years(early 1900's)? We are much smarter now. Companies make money by treating diseases not curing diseases. They will bye block any up coming cure and put it on the shelf. This is our country the land of the free. We have many many charities, walk a thons and fund raisers to raise money for cures. Where does the money go? The money goes to the companies that are with holding cures. We have children hoping to find a cure for a life threatening illness and we don't have the heart to say its not coming from these companies. Fit this in your next political decision because it won't be talked about. Don't look to politics look to Jesus only.
 
Bookends

Bookends

Senior Member
#12
Aug 28, 2012
4,225
99
48
#12
tapuout101 said:
Does people realise that Romney is a Morman Bishop? I wouldn't think Woman would take to the polygamy type relationship. I see a lot of TV preachers doing most of their sermon on politics. I even emailed a couple telling them we follow GOD not Rep. or Dem. If a Rep. or Dem. is the answer why is our world going down faster than ever? They can't fix it because they are not GOD. We need to be real about money and power. Churches give huge contributions to politics mostly the Rep. party supposing to be better. The drug companies give huge contributions to politics to push their drugs. Drug companies are corperations with their ONLY goal is to make money. Why have we not had a cure in a hundred years(early 1900's)? We are much smarter now. Companies make money by treating diseases not curing diseases. They will bye block any up coming cure and put it on the shelf. This is our country the land of the free. We have many many charities, walk a thons and fund raisers to raise money for cures. Where does the money go? The money goes to the companies that are with holding cures. We have children hoping to find a cure for a life threatening illness and we don't have the heart to say its not coming from these companies. Fit this in your next political decision because it won't be talked about. Don't look to politics look to Jesus only.
Click to expand...
Which why we should always vote for less government, rather then more government (in spite of how small the significance may be between the two parties). IMO, it seems to be that the Dem. party wants people to be dependent of Government. So what happens, People look to government for their sustenance instead of the local Church where then can find both physical and spiritual sustenance in which only can Jesus provide.
 
T

tapuout101

Guest
#13
#13
First we need to drop the whole political party crap Rep. and Dem. Do not listen to political or the news stuff it is a seed. Erase the whole way they want you to think they think.lol Why?Why? The politcal stuff does not work. Money is power and corruption. If we don't have money we don't have any power even a worthless vote. We are doing the very definition of INSANITY. I think we might need a lot more people power. :) We should not have a society that has people starving. We should not have a society that people can't get medical. We have our own people children starving and we call ourselves free?? We should be ashamed. I think it should be more 80/20 in riches not the free money powerthing. We will still have the richer and the poorer titles,but no one will be suffering.Our drug companies SHOULD BE RAN BY the government. The government will find cures fast real fast to save money. They will not want to pay for treatment. We have to have a government run medical system where the poor is covered. What we have been doing is not working. Why not at least try something differant? Why pay a billion dollars for a pres. campaign and talk we need to save money? Why is no one standing up on these real things?
 
T

TheGrungeDiva

Guest
#14
#14
Do you have any evidence to support the claim that Obama's team is purposely "padding" his pictures with women and racial minorities? I mean, it would not surprise me at all to learn that 90% of African Americans support Obama, making it far more likely to find them at any particular Obama rally than at any particular Romney rally. That's not racist on Obama's part OR on Romney's part .... I mean, one could say the voters themselves might be racist, some of them voting for Obama just because he's the same color as they are. I'm sure there are a few who did that 4 years ago and a few who will do that this time around. I'm also sure there are a few white voters who will vote for Romney just because he is NOT black. It goes both ways, and you can't blame either candidate for the racism that exists on both sides of the aisle.

As for women, if Romney's party keeps making stupid sexist statements about women, I'm not sure how they expect to keep the women who are republicans. Telling women that some rape is "legitimate"? Explaining to women that their bodies shut down when they're raped, so that if they really didn't want to get pregnant, they wouldn't, so the fact that they are pregnant means they must have wanted to get pregnant.... I mean, seriously. These statements would have been seen as pig-headed in the 20th Century, let alone the 21st. Even if you are against abortion, certainly, you must understand why women would be a little peeved at some of the things that have come out of the mouths of Republicans in the past few weeks. I have to say, at least Romney is being relatively smart by distancing himself from these wack-jobs.

Honestly, is there anyone out there who thinks there's a such thing as "legitimate" rape?
 
O

OFM

Guest
#15
#15
republican senate canidates do romney too he does not at all speak out agianist it when he could of 4 times at least
 
You must log in or register to reply here.