Those in torment where they saved at the cross?
I think you are going to have a hard time getting people to buy into that one soandsoyes as christ said "let the dead be dead still,and the living living",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Many do the same. Rather than admiting and repenting of their own sin, they want to accuse others of being sinful as well. As if that would excuse their own sin, or acquit them when they face judgement.from reading these posts, sounds like zone is trying to justify her own sin
i didn't say you were methodist. you're in the Holiness crowd. do you believe in the Second work of grace/Second baptism that burns out the sin nature and you're now sinless?
This is a true statement, but if you promote OSAS aren't you, yourself an antinomian
Rom.8
[29] For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.
[30] Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.
Rom.9
[15] For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.
[16] So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.
[17] For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth.
[18] Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.
[30] What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith.
[31] But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.
[32] Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;
[33] As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumblingstone and rock of offence: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
As for the prayer. (many call sinner's prayer), I do believe many who said it have never been saved. The reason is not because they did not say the prayer. But the fact they truely did not have faith in what they were asking. They did not have a repentant heart. Many say it I believe as a stop gap measure "Just in case this is true" but really do not believe they need it. We know these people by the lack of change in life.
As your salvation is by the power of God. We can't earn it. If we can't earn it we can't lose it. Saying you can lose it. is saying you must earn it. Which means it is of works. not of grace.
If you understood true biblical grace, you would not claim that we as believers must continue in sin.
A needed reminder indeed. Interestingly enough, if one studies the law, one will see how it implies that man is sinful and commands that man receives the only valid means by which God will deal with his sin (i e, the gospel). Those who do not trust and obey this, will be cut-off.
There is actually only one way for enthusiasts to be able to claim that they are "not sinning". And that is to go the same way that the pharisees went. They have to twist, redefine and ultimately reject God's law, and replace it with another standard, which is possible for men to live up to. Of course this is at root lawlessness, not a strive to be obedient to God's commandments. It is ironic that this kind of legalism actually is antinomian in nature. Like I said in another post: one has to acknowledge God's law properly. Not all people will let God's law judge them or accept what the law says about them. You can see this deception at work in the redefinition of sin and in a superficial sin concept. And, again, this is of course always also related to its opposite - the redefinition of righteousness and justification. Which actually means justifying sin.
In short there are usually two main ways that this is done. One is to indulge in sin and yet say that this is not sin or that this sinning is actually grace at work (the heresy of libertinism). The other one is to claim to have no sin, and when confronted with the law of yet having sin still say: "I don't call that sin" (the heresy of sinless perfectionism). Both these deceptions are antinomian heresies. Therefore both are ignorant of the righteousness of God and none of them believe the gospel.
Once saved always saved is a heresy. Jesus nor any of the diciples ever taught that. In fact, the Apostle Paul taught us not to even judge our own selves and to "Judge NOTHING before the time". He said IT IS THE LORD WHO JUDGES ME.
1Corinthians 4:4 For I know nothing by myself; yet am I not hereby justified: but he that judgeth me is the Lord. 5 Therefore judge nothing before the time, until the Lord come, who both will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts: and then shall every man have praise of God.
At the ending he's saying that those who judge themselves as righteous praise themselves. He's teaching us that it is GOD who gives the praise not our own selves at the last judgment.
That's only your interpretation on what Jesus said, its not what He meant. He meant to say that if you are in Jesus' hands, then when the tempter and the deceiver comes to steal you he will not be able to.
that's quite an assertion zilla.from reading these posts, sounds like zone is trying to justify her own sin
Seeing as scripture plainly states that we who are in Christ are no able to fulfill the standards of the law, then you have made a bold statement here. I would go as far as calling it blasphemyis that Righteous Life imputed or reckoned to our account? or are we empowered to be perfectly obedient and sinless just like Jesus....if so i suppose He isn't really an High Priest forever. what need?
love zone.