P
pckts
Guest
You don't have to admit the earth is flat, you just have to admit at least one of these photos is fake or heavily altered.
I was a crew chief in the Air Force and worked around a lot of pilots, many of them high altitude pilots. You do not have to be very high in the upper atmosphere before you begin to see clearly the shape of the planet. Also if the earth was flat, you would not have an issue with line of sight in the open sea which at eye level is at maximum 6.9 miles. This is because after that point, the curvature of the earth takes the object out of sight.
When you look at those pictures, do you believe they are real?
Uh Oh, here comes the personal "I know a guy" unverifiable evidence claim. Change the subject away from the undeniable evidence NASA uses fake photos that deceive you, so we can talk about anecdotes that prove you are right.
If the Earth is round where is God located? We all assume above us.. The new Jerusalem comes down... We all can't be downward located if we are "around a globe" ... It will be interesting to see answers to this because I am not fixed on either side.. I'm aware text books are controlled information, so I'm open to the challenge of school teachings
So I am supposed to believe these photos are fake simply because you say so or because you "know a guy" who says so. What evidence other than speculation do you have that proves these photos to be fake.
No, you should believe they are fake because of the proportions of north America on two photos released officially by NASA.
You think your interpretation of the images is the only possible explanation and you call me close-minded?
The south pole has been explored, observed, and mapped and guess what, no giant hole was discovered
Well it's not just MY interpretation, I didn't create the original photo with the commentary and some others posting agree with me.
I think the only explanation for the proportion of a continent drastically changing in relation to the overall "globe", is that one or both of the images are partially or entirely CGI.
Personally I think both are entirely CGI.
The best part is NASA admits that all of the photos are composite images created from a series of "satellite" images, but all of you deny what NASA admits and pretend you live in a world where these pictures were snapped in one shot. You should argue they are just composites like you are told by authority, instead of believing in a fantasy that even authority no longer tries to pass of as reality.
If the Earth is round where is God located? We all assume above us.. The new Jerusalem comes down... We all can't be downward located if we are "around a globe" ... It will be interesting to see answers to this because I am not fixed on either side.. I'm aware text books are controlled information, so I'm open to the challenge of school teachings
Well it's not just MY interpretation, I didn't create the original photo with the commentary and some others posting agree with me.
I think the only explanation for the proportion of a continent drastically changing in relation to the overall "globe", is that one or both of the images are partially or entirely CGI.
Personally I think both are entirely CGI.
Well son, from what I understand, intelligence often skips a generation. I am sure your children will all be very bright.
Here globers:
Nasa releases first picture of the whole Earth taken in 43 years | The Independent
The lie the matrix has supplied you to cover up their previous lies regarding the earth photos and to enable you to continue denying the truth and living in the matrix.
Well son, from what I understand, intelligence often skips a generation. I am sure your children will all be very bright.