D
Refering to King David, he could have saved himself a lot of trouble if he had taken note of What God warned:
The king, moreover, must not acquire great numbers of horses for himself or make the people return to Egypt to get more of them, for the LORD has told you, "You are not to go back that way again." He must not take many wives, or his heart will be led astray. He must not accumulate large amounts of silver and gold. (deut 17:16-17)
Goo advice to us all I think?
If you do not mind I will repost my post on that thread:
I think the problem with polygamy, regardless of manmade laws, is that one wife will be loved over the others. This is seen even in the polygamous unions in the Bible. Sarah detested the slavegirl Hagar for giving her to Abraham. Rachel was loved over Leah. Samuel's mom felt bitter and dejected and Peninnah provoked her because she had no child. David had many wives and many children, but he loved Bathsheba and Solomon and the problems did arise between Solomon and Adonijah near David's death.
It is good for a man to only have one wife and one mate and to pour all his affection into her I believe. And not just for belief, but lo not only do the problems of multiple lovers bear out in the Bible, but in our modern society very much so.
To which I'll add, those are my thoughts on the matter and what I have gleaned from the Bible and lightly touching what I have seen in fallen modern society, and I am one unmarried, though I would like to be married one day, but what are your thoughts?
DanD,
Just for clarity, are you for polygamy, or against it?
Well, I am clearly NOT against it.
Certainly polygamy can have problems, and the OT does instruct/warn against loving one wife more than another, and diminishing your first wife's provisions. I think the biggest problem Sarah had was not so much with Hagar, but with the way Ishmael treated Isaac with scorn. The problems between Adonijah and Solomon were spelled out in Nathan's prophetic judgement for the sins of adultery and murder, when he said, "the sword will never depart out of your house." David would no doubt have had similar judgement had he been unmarried at the time he committed those sins. It is a common mistake to attribute this judgement to polygamy, but that is simply a misconception based on Western ideals. Rachel was loved over Leah, but Jacob did the right thing by not divorcing the woman he was tricked into marrying. God blessed him with twelve children, and indeed there was strife in that family, but do you think that Jacob would have been happier married only to Leah? Put yourself in his position. How would you feel knowing you had been tricked into marrying someone other than the woman you truly love? It was bad enough that he had to work an additional seven years, in essence for a wife he did not even desire!
The direction from Scripture is to love your wives. Nowhere does the Bible indicate that it is better to pour all your affection into one woman. I'm not even sure that affection is a divisible, much less quantifiable essence. You either love someone or you don't. It is quite possible to love the new wife as much as if she were your only wife, while not loving your first wife any less than when she was your only wife. If you happen to land that "trophy wife", it would be reasonable to think that you would be completely happy with her. In reality though, there have been many men who had such a wife, and found themselves in love with another woman. The problems in polygamy are different than the problems found in monogamy. The extra income is not a bad outcome.
Good luck finding a Godly wife! You might want to leave the option available for a second or third wife, by being open and honest with your first wife, before you tie the proverbial knot. Then, in the event you choose to bring another woman into the relationship, you won't face as much resistance from her, as I have faced. Point out the reality of failed marriages in our monogamous society, and assure her that you will never leave her for another woman. Explain the origins of monogamy only and how it has failed to live up to what society promises.
Well, I am clearly NOT against it.
Why did you need a new thread? The old one have too much you didn't want to discuss?
For anyone who didn't catch the thread first time around....
http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/76842-polygamy.html
David would have saved himself the trouble if he had not disobeyed the command regarding taking another man's wife. Remember the prophetic judgement given by Nathan the prophet, "the sword shall never depart from your house", was given because of his adultery and murder. These commands would have been broken regardless of whether David had any wives at the time he committed adultery and murder, and no doubt, the judgement pronounced would have been equally severe, and fitting for taking another man's life after taking his wife.
1 Timothy 2 v 3
A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
****
God seems to be against it.
He made Adam and Eve..., not Eves, plural.
God allowed many things before Jesus and the new covenant. Now He says it's better for a man to have ONE wife, not many.
So, you a mormon?
1 Timothy 2 v 3
A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
****
God seems to be against it.
He made Adam and Eve..., not Eves, plural.
God allowed many things before Jesus and the new covenant. Now He says it's better for a man to have ONE wife, not many.
I do not now how men turn God's clear admonition to be faithful to your wife
into permission to go get more. Clearly it is a perversion, and a refusal to obey.
A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; KJV 1 Tim 3:2
An elder must be blameless, the husband of one wife, having children who are believers and are not open to accusation of indiscretion or insubordination. Titus 1:6
And this second thing you do. You cover the Lord's altar with tears, with weeping and groaning because he no longer regards the offering or accepts it with favor from your hand. 14 But you say, “Why does he not?” Because the Lord was witness between you and the wife of your youth, to whom you have been faithless, though she is your companion and your wife by covenant. 15 Did he not make them one, with a portion of the Spirit in their union? And what was the one God seeking? Godly offspring. So guard yourselves in your spirit, and let none of you be faithless to the wife of your youth.16 “For the man who does not love his wife but divorces her, says the Lord, the God of Israel, covers his garment with violence, says the Lord of hosts. So guard yourselves in your spirit, and do not be faithless.”Malachi 2:13-16
May your fountain be blessed, and may you rejoice in the wife of your youth. Prov 5:18
It is not just, do not divorce, but be faithful to the wife of your youth.
Your missing the point Dan! Was Adultery Davids only problem - of course not! The point I was making is - he should, like us, have had an eye more to what God had commanded rather than on his own selfish desires.
Why did you need a new thread? The old one have too much you didn't want to discuss?
For anyone who didn't catch the thread first time around....
http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/76842-polygamy.html
Well I agree with you a bit. Though I think in the case of Sarah it wasn't just the mistreatment of Isaac by Ishmael, but Sarah, the princess, the free woman protecting her heir, the rightful heir as it is written, Cast out the slave woman, her son will not be heir with my son. Is it not also written that Sarah after she had given Hagar to Abraham and saw that Hagar conceived that Sarah despised her? This is even before Isaac is born.
In the case of David I do agree with you, but then let us remember why Nathan came to him with that famous prophecy and parable. Was it not because David was beholden with Bathsheba and put loyal Urijah to death to possess her? A man with many lambs whom took from another man whom had only one precious lamb that he loved indeed!
I do not fault Jacob for having two wives, for that fault is in Laban whom changed his wages deceitfully. Yet is it not written that because Leah was hated the Lord opened her womb? What of the jealous contest between the two sisters?
As for monogamy; in the beginning God made one man for one woman, and the two became one flesh.
Or what does Paul say? Did he say to Timothy it is good for a man to have one wife if he is to marry?