Reconciled to God while enemies !

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
You need to go back and read, this isnt kindergarten
I’m not trying to be difficult. I honestly just want to understand your point. If you believe my comments are contradictory, I’m asking you to show where the contradiction is so we can look at it together. I’m willing to listen — I just need something specific to respond to. Thanks for your patience.
 
You in outright rebellion against what Paul said, Paul wrote Rom 5:10


Yes by not imputing their sins unto them, Read it here 2 Cor 5:19

19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.

This particular world is free from sins penalty, thats another feature of being reconciled by His death Rom 5:10 ! Have you ever preached that before or told someone that ?
I appreciate you bringing 2 Corinthians 5:19 into the discussion. I’m simply trying to stay close to Paul’s categories. If reconciliation were fully accomplished for a specific group by the death of Christ alone, then Paul’s “ministry of reconciliation” wouldn’t make much sense — there would be nothing left to announce or appeal for. But Paul clearly sees reconciliation as something God has accomplished on His side, and something humans must still respond to. That’s why he pleads, “Be reconciled to God.”

I’m not denying the power or sufficiency of Christ’s death. I’m only saying that reconciliation, by definition, involves two parties. God has already acted decisively in Christ; now Paul’s ministry calls people to respond to that open door. That’s all I’m trying to express.
 
My point isn’t about how the reconciled are saved — that isn’t the question Paul is addressing in Romans 5:10.
Its my point though, saved there is subjective reconciliation among other things. Christ by His death and intercession after death saves them He died for to the uttermost, and they come unto God by Him Heb 7"25

25 Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them.

The word uttermost pantelēs means

  1. all complete, perfect
  2. completely, perfectly, utterly

So in Rom 5:10 shall be saved by His Life includes His Intercession, He liveth for that purpose. But unfortunately you deny this
 
The issue in the text is when reconciliation takes place and who Paul is calling “enemies.” Paul’s contrast is between God’s action in Christ and our former state of hostility, not between different groups of people. I’m simply trying to stay with the categories Paul himself uses.
You doing a poor job of it
 

I agree that Scripture teaches God chose His people before the foundation of the world.
Sure did
, Scripture also teaches that the Father has given the Son authority to give eternal life to whomever He wills (John 5:21; John 17:2
To give eternal life to as many as the Father has given Him Jn 17:2

2 As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him.
 
@Roger316

Peter is describing what Christ accomplished — He opened the way for us to come to God.

He brings us to God, not merely open a way. Do you know what bring means ? The word prosagō has the verb ago which means:

  1. to lead, guide, direct
  2. to lead through, conduct to: to something
  3. to move, impel: of forces and influences on the mind

But access by itself doesn’t automatically mean a person uses it. Christ has made it possible for us to approach the Father,

False, Christ brings us to God, He gives us the access, you selling Christ short.

That doesn’t diminish Christ’s work;

It does diminish it, He brings us to God, not make it possible

it simply recognizes that reconciliation, by nature, involves a response.

Christ gives that, He gives repentance, a change of mind. Dude Christ is a complete Saviour
 
If reconciliation were fully accomplished for a specific group by the death of Christ alone, then Paul’s “ministry of reconciliation” wouldn’t make much sense —
Thats false, Pauls ministry is for the sake of the elect/ chosen people 2 Tim 2:10

10 Therefore I endure all things for the elect's sakes, that they may also obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory
 
But Paul clearly sees reconciliation as something God has accomplished on His side, and something humans must still respond to. That’s why he pleads, “Be reconciled to God.”
I have dealt with this numerous times, that imperative is solely to the already reconciled
I’m not denying the power or sufficiency of Christ’s death.

Unfortunatelyyou are, maybe not intentionally, but you are doing it
I’m only saying that reconciliation, by definition, involves two parties.

Yes it does, and Jesus is responsible for both parties being reconciled to one another.
Paul’s ministry calls people to respond to that open door. That’s all I’m trying to express.

Thats false, God via Paul is commanding and causing the subjective reconciliation by the word. by believing what is already true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rogerg
Until he is given the wisdom that Christ alone is the Savior who had perfectly achieved everything necessary to freely give salvation to His elect, he will be unable to accept what you are trying to teach him. He will continue to try to force man's efforts into the salvation transaction, which transaction, was solely between God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, Savior.
Wow. I didn't say anything like what you claim I said.
 
I have dealt with this numerous times
I understand your desire to give God all the credit, but a war involves two parties. Both sides must agree to cease hostilities. If you want to give God credit for your surrender, then we can make a Biblical case for that. But you still need to surrender. You can't simply take it for granted.
 
Thats false, Pauls ministry is for the sake of the elect/ chosen people 2 Tim 2:10

10 Therefore I endure all things for the elect's sakes, that they may also obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory
What is he doing for them that Christ didn't already do? Think about it.
Paul exhorts people to reconcile with God because he expects them to reconcile with God.
 
He brings us to God, not merely open a way. Do you know what bring means?
Yes, I know what 'bring' means. But think about it a minute. Yes, προσαγάγῃ (“bring”) is a movement verb — but we can't assume that “movement” must mean physical relocation rather than relational access. In Greek, especially in Jewish‑Greek, this verb is technical temple language, and its “movement” is ritual, relational, and covenantal, not spatial.

Christ's suffering has brought us into a new relational position before God. The movement is from alienation to access.
This is exactly the kind of “movement” the temple priest performed when he brought a worshiper near to God by offering a sacrifice. The worshiper didn’t move anywhere — their status changed.

But in Greek, προσάγω is not about physical transport. It’s about granting audience, opening access, removing barriers.

Peter is not talking about salvation in the technical, Pauline sense, and certainly not about expiation for the elect. You are importing a systematic category into a pastoral text. Peter’s concern is suffering, vindication, and access, not the mechanics of atonement. Peter’s point is that Christ’s suffering has opened a way for believers to approach God confidently in their own suffering, not that Christ is here applying salvation to the elect. Your interpretation masks Peters Pastoral advice to his readers, his actual message.

Christ gives that, He gives repentance, a change of mind. Dude Christ is a complete Saviour
You still gotta repent. Christ isn't going to do that for you.
 
What do you mean?
Are you asking me what a minister does? When he talks about being a minister of reconciliation this means that he calls on people to reconcile with God. He literally says, "Be reconciled to God." But you want to say, "Don't worry silly, Christ already did that for you."
 
Either you repented and converted or you didn't.
When you hear the gospel of Jesus Christ and acknowledge that you believe, then you are saved (Romans 10).

Romans 10:9
That if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead,
you will be saved
; for with the heart a person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the mouth he confesses,
resulting in salvation.

Your repentance, water baptism, endurance, theology, blah, blah, blah, has nothing to do with that reconciliation that
Jesus gave to us.

Salvation is simply a free gift given to those that believe in Him.

Christ's perfect sacrifice which granted us immortality was through Christ alone.
 
I have dealt with this numerous times, that imperative is solely to the already reconciled
You have some strange ideas. If I tell my son to comb his hair and brush his teeth the assumption is that he hasn't brushed or combed. When Paul commands his readers to be reconciled, the assumption is that they haven't done it yet. If Christ combed my son's hair and brushed his teeth, I would not ask my son to do something that was already accomplished. Paul is asking his readers to be reconciled to God because it hasn't already been accomplished.
Yes it does, and Jesus is responsible for both parties being reconciled to one another.

That is only true for those who actually and in fact, reconcile with God.
Thats false, God via Paul is commanding and causing the subjective reconciliation by the word. by believing what is already true.
Where does it say that something is true simply by believing it? There are men who believe they are women. It doesn't make it true.