Resolving Problematic Interpretations of Scripture

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
The better harmonization is simply refusing to let any of TULIP’s five affirmations override the plain, bidirectional structure of Scripture, where God speaks in strong inability language about the flesh (Rom 8:7–8; Rom 3:11) while simultaneously issuing real moral commands to seek, repent, believe, choose, and not resist His will (Deut 30:19; Matt 7:7; Matt 23:37; Acts 7:51).

So for T (Total Depravity), Paul’s “cannot” describes the flesh’s moral posture, not the annihilation of human accountability, because the same Paul commands seeking and shows people refusing God’s will;
for U (Unconditional Election), the text’s own sequence — foreknowledge → predestination → calling → justification → glorification (Rom 8:29–30) — is anchored in God’s purpose but never removes the revealed condition of faith (Rom 3:21–26; Eph 2:8–10);
for L (Limited Atonement), Scripture teaches universal provision (“world,” “all,” “every man,” John 3:16; 1 Tim 2:6) with conditional reception, not a restricted intent;
for I (Irresistible Grace), Jesus explicitly says people resist God’s will (Matt 23:37) and Stephen says they “always resist the Holy Spirit” (Acts 7:51), which makes grace offered, enabled, and convicting — but not coercive;
for P (Perseverance), the warnings to believers (Heb 6:4–6; Matt 12:31) show real apostasy risk, not guaranteed non‑falling.

In short, the harmonization is this: every “cannot” describes the flesh’s rebellion, every “command” presumes real volition, every “offer” is universal, every “condition” is faith, and every “warning” is genuine — none of which contradict MFW, and none of which require the TULIP grid to reinterpret the plain text.

We agree that Scripture contradicts tulip and makes its points heretical, and MFW states the "cannot" in positive terms: sinners CAN repent, they CAN repent because God enables sufficient moral freedom/faith, and they CAN exercise faith to satisfy IF.

What do you think about my explanation of why ignorant Christians who do not intend to blaspheme God may be saved
(per 1Cor. 3:13-15)?:

The concerns of those who accept TULIP—to affirm the sovereignty of God and the inability of souls to earn salvation—are valid, but the solutions are problematic, because they deny or ignore Scripture teaching the love of God for all sinners and the moral accountability of sinners for not repenting of rejecting the love of God, thereby effectively perverting the Gospel (Gal. 5:6) and impugning God’s justness/righteousness (Psa. 33:5, Isa. 9:7).

The apparent reasons for these errors are threefold:
1. Ignorance of Scripture that contradicts their dogma, such as those teaching the possibility of apostasy,
2. Viewing faith as a meritorious work rather than as the non-meritorious condition of cooperating with God’s grace, and
3. Unconcern about portraying God as unjust by showing favoritism toward the elect. Once these errors are cured by including Scripture supporting MFW, doctrinal harmony is enhanced.
 
What do you think about my explanation of why ignorant Christians who do not intend to blaspheme God may be saved
(per 1Cor. 3:13-15)?:
You did not give post# as to where to read your take on 1Cor. so i will wait for your response on that and give you my take on it.
Ignorant Christians who do not intend to blaspheme God may indeed be saved because Paul explicitly distinguishes between the man and his work: the work may burn, but “he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire” (1 Cor 3:15). That category only applies to true believers building poorly — not to unbelievers, not to false teachers preaching another gospel (Gal 1:6–9), and not to willful blasphemers of the Spirit (Matt 12:31).
The concerns of those who accept TULIP—to affirm the sovereignty of God and the inability of souls to earn salvation—are valid, but the solutions are problematic, because they deny or ignore Scripture teaching the love of God for all sinners and the moral accountability of sinners for not repenting of rejecting the love of God, thereby effectively perverting the Gospel (Gal. 5:6) and impugning God’s justness/righteousness (Psa. 33:5, Isa. 9:7).
TULIP’s concerns are biblical, but its conclusions aren’t.
The apparent reasons for these errors are threefold:
1. Ignorance of Scripture that contradicts their dogma, such as those teaching the possibility of apostasy,
2. Viewing faith as a meritorious work rather than as the non-meritorious condition of cooperating with God’s grace, and
3. Unconcern about portraying God as unjust by showing favoritism toward the elect. Once these errors are cured by including Scripture supporting MFW, doctrinal harmony is enhanced.
Your three points work because they name exactly where TULIP breaks the text — ignoring apostasy passages, redefining faith as a work, and being unconcerned about contradicting God’s impartial justice — and once those errors are corrected by including Scripture that affirms MFW, the doctrinal tension disappears.
 
Coming to add my two cents about TULIP that was being discussed in GWH's other political thread.

In my opinion, it all rests on God's foreknowledge. The Bible tells us that God knew each one of us before we were even in the womb. He has the ability to see the end from the beginning and knows which people will be/would be willing to accept Him based on that knowledge and He uses it to His advantage to carry out His will and His overall plan for the world as it is now written.
 
You did not give post# as to where to read your take on 1Cor. so i will wait for your response on that and give you my take on it.
Ignorant Christians who do not intend to blaspheme God may indeed be saved because Paul explicitly distinguishes between the man and his work: the work may burn, but “he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire” (1 Cor 3:15). That category only applies to true believers building poorly — not to unbelievers, not to false teachers preaching another gospel (Gal 1:6–9), and not to willful blasphemers of the Spirit (Matt 12:31).

TULIP’s concerns are biblical, but its conclusions aren’t.

Your three points work because they name exactly where TULIP breaks the text — ignoring apostasy passages, redefining faith as a work, and being unconcerned about contradicting God’s impartial justice — and once those errors are corrected by including Scripture that affirms MFW, the doctrinal tension disappears.

What I said in the previous post is my application of 1Cor. 3:15 to the case of naive heretics, which insight I only recently received, and what you just said indicates agreement with that application.

Not sure what else to discuss unless you want to peruse the rest of this thread, which continues with this survey or Romans:

The passage of Scripture that seems to be the fountainhead of the TULIP dogma is Romans 9:10-24. Thus, a systematic study of the doctrine of election might begin well by interpreting Paul’s explanation of salvation/election (s/e) in his epistle to the Romans as the context for that proof-text), namely the rest of Romans, especially Romans 1-11. Here are relevant teachings in the first five chapters:

1. Rom. 1:16 says the Gospel reveals that s/e is for “everyone who believes”, both Jew and Gentile.

2. Rom. 1:17 describes s/e as “righteousness from God” that is by faith “from first to last” or from creation until the end.

3. Rom. 2:4 teaches that God’s kindness or patience with sinners is meant to lead them toward repentance (s/e), which implies that sinners are able to repent because of God’s leading.

4. Rom. 2:5 warns that those who do not repent but instead stubbornly resist God’s leading are storing up wrath against themselves for the day when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed, which implies that God enables sinners to repent–or not (cf. Deut. 30:19).

5. Rom. 2:6 affirms what is called karma by saying that “God will give to each person according to what he has done”, which (in Gal. 6:7-9) is called reaping what a person sows.

6. Rom. 2:7 speaks of the need for “persistence in doing good” and seeking glory, honor and immortality in order to receive s/e or eternal life, which echoes what Jesus commanded (in Matt. 7:7) and connects with the doctrine of perseverance (cf. Heb. 10:36 & Jam. 1:3-4).

7. Rom. 2:11 teaches that “God does not show favoritism” (cf. Eph. 6:9, Col. 3:25, 1Pet. 1:17), which is how God judges people justly, so the fact that some sinners ignore God’s Gospel indicates that His will or leading is resistible because of MFW.

8. Rom. 2:15 teaches that sinful souls have a conscience or awareness of “the requirements of the law”, which may be combined with Romans 1:20 to teach that God’s power and moral nature or will may be perceived via creation and conscience (called natural revelation), thus those unfamiliar with God’s Word in Scripture have no good reason for resisting divine leading and choosing atheism/evil.

9. Rom. 3:20-21 states the law makes souls conscious of sin and that “the Law and Prophets testify” or prepare the way for the new revelation of righteousness from God apart from the Law, which takes up where Romans 1:17 left off.

10. Rom. 3:22a says that “righteousness from God” or s/e comes through faith “in Jesus Christ” (cf. Eph. 2:8), a phrase Paul used eleven times in Ephesians 1:3-14 to indicate s/e.

11. Rom. 3:22b says that God’s righteousness is given “to all who believe—there is no difference”” signifying that all sinners may believe or be s/e (cf. 1Tim. 2:3-4, John 3:16, Tit. 2:11), because there is no favoritism (#7).

12. Rom. 3:23 teaches that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God”, meaning that no one can be good enough to earn salvation because of their own merit.

13. Rom. 3:24 says sinners “are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus” (via faith per v.22, cf. 3:27-28); s/e is free because Christ paid the price/cost.

14. Rom. 3:25a explains redemption as being “a sacrifice of atonement” for those who have faith in Christ’s work of dying in their place.

15. Rom. 3:25b further explains that God demonstrated his just patience (#3) or forbearance in leaving unpunished those sins committed before the revealing of the Gospel (foreshadowed in Gen. 22:8 & 13), implying that sinners had/have the opportunity to believe and be s/e thereby demonstrating God’s justice/not showing favoritism (#11).

16. Rom. 3:26 continues to emphasize divine justice by declaring it three ways (“justice…, just…, justifies”), which justness is synonymous with righteousness (2Thes. 1:5-6, Heb. 6:10).

17. Rom. 4:1-25 presents Abraham as a Gentile who became the physical father of the Jews and the spiritual father of all who choose to have faith in God/Christ.

18. Rom. 5:1 echoes Eph. 2:8 by describing s/e as justification through faith, Eph. 1:5 & 7 by using the phrase “through Jesus Christ”, and Eph. 2:14 by describing s/e as having peace with God.

19. Romans 5:2 & 5 also echo Eph. 2:18 & 3:1 by describing s/e as having access to God’s grace via the Holy Spirit.

20. Romans 5:6-10 states that God’s love (cf. kindness in #3) for the ungodly, for sinners and for His enemies is demonstrated by Christ dying for their s/e or justification/reconciliation.

21. Romans 5:12-21 describes s/e in corporate terms, saying that–like the first man–all (many?) men also sinned and died, and God’s grace comes to all (many?) because of Jesus Christ.

Over...
 
The passage of Scripture that seems to be the fountainhead of the TULIP dogma is Romans 9:10-24. Thus, a systematic study of the doctrine of election might begin well by interpreting Paul’s explanation of the Gospel in his epistle to the Romans as the context for that proof-text), namely the rest of Romans, especially Romans 1-11.
I agree, Romans 9 is one piece of a larger chain, and its meaning is governed by the surrounding chapters. Romans 9 cannot be isolated from Paul’s full argument in Romans 1–11, because Paul is not introducing a new doctrine in chapter 9; he is defending the same Gospel he has already explained:
all are guilty (Romans 1–3),
justification is by faith (Romans 3–5),
believers must walk in the Spirit (Romans 6–8), and
God’s promises to Israel stand because they are grounded in His faithfulness, not human lineage (Romans 9–11).
When Romans 9:10‑24 is treated as a standalone “fountainhead” of a system, it gets ripped from the context where Paul repeatedly ties salvation to hearing, believing, and calling upon the Lord (Romans 10:9‑17), and where he insists God “shuts up all in unbelief that He might have mercy upon all” (Romans 11:32).
 
Coming to add my two cents about TULIP that was being discussed in GWH's other political thread.

In my opinion, it all rests on God's foreknowledge. The Bible tells us that God knew each one of us before we were even in the womb. He has the ability to see the end from the beginning and knows which people will be/would be willing to accept Him based on that knowledge and He uses it to His advantage to carry out His will and His overall plan for the world as it is now written.

All contributions are welcome, especially those that make good cents.
Yes, tulipists err by viewing divine foreknowledge as nullifying MFW.
 
I agree, Romans 9 is one piece of a larger chain, and its meaning is governed by the surrounding chapters. Romans 9 cannot be isolated from Paul’s full argument in Romans 1–11, because Paul is not introducing a new doctrine in chapter 9; he is defending the same Gospel he has already explained:
all are guilty (Romans 1–3),
justification is by faith (Romans 3–5),
believers must walk in the Spirit (Romans 6–8), and
God’s promises to Israel stand because they are grounded in His faithfulness, not human lineage (Romans 9–11).
When Romans 9:10‑24 is treated as a standalone “fountainhead” of a system, it gets ripped from the context where Paul repeatedly ties salvation to hearing, believing, and calling upon the Lord (Romans 10:9‑17), and where he insists God “shuts up all in unbelief that He might have mercy upon all” (Romans 11:32).

Agreement is good, and I guess it makes finishing my presentation of Romans moot, so I will skip to the next section:

The survey of Romans 1-11 (R#1-42) will now be applied to the TULIP and MFW doctrines in order to see which parts of these interpretations are supported by that Scripture. This application will continue the enumeration begun by the survey.

43. Regarding Total depravity, R#1-6 teach that all normal adult humans are sinners and that God’s intent (will/desire) is to lead them to repent, so they will not condemn themselves to suffer righteous wrath—which implies that sinners are enabled by God’s leading to repent, so their depravity does not totally nullify MFW.

44. Regarding Unconditional election, R#10, 11, 14 & 15 specifically cite faith/belief as the condition for receiving s/e. R#17 illustrates this truth with the example of Abraham leading to the conclusion that faith is the condition for justification or s/e in R#18. R#34 laments that Jews as a whole failed to satisfy the condition of faith, and R#35 celebrates that everyone may satisfy that condition.

45. Regarding Limited atonement, R#20&21 indicate that Christ died to pay the penalty for all sins of all sinners, and R#29 laments that most Jews reject Christ’s atonement, although R#37 finds consolation because there remains a remnant who have not stumbled over the stumbling-stone, who is Christ (R#34).

46. Regarding Irresistible grace, R#3&4 refer to wicked souls who spurn God’s kindness and do not repent. References to “all who believe” (R#11) and to “the man who has faith” (R#15) imply there are some who resist saving faith. R#32 cites pharaoh as an example of a sinner who hardened his heart against God’s will.

47. Regarding Perseverance, R#6 implies the need for those who do not resist God’s leading to persist in doing that. R#40 mentions God’s kindness to believers provided that they continue to believe, because if not they “also will be cut off”.

48. Regarding Moral volition, R#9 teaches that the purpose of the law is to make souls conscious of sin, and R#10-11 teach how to attain righteousness from God. R#22 urges Christians not to continue sinning, and R#26&27 contrast the sinful nature with the new way of cooperating with the Spirit until Christians attain the likeness of Christ.

49. Regarding Freedom to choose, faith connotes a lack of proof or coercion, thereby making the chooser responsible for resisting God’s kind leading per R#3&4, which onus for evil is sensed by one’s conscience (R#8) or consciousness of sin (R#9). Even the reference to slavery in R#23 speaks of obedience being offered.

50. Regarding Will or volition, it is signified in R#32&38 by the heart, and the sinful will is described as hardened (cf. obstinate in Rom. 10:21). In R#39 Israel’s corporate will to sin is called transgression.

Over...
 
  • Like
Reactions: OMC
Now let us consider other Scriptures sometimes cited in descriptions of the TULIP and MFW interpretations in light of Romans 1-11.

T – Mark 7:21-23 lists some evil thoughts in sinful hearts, but it does not teach that evil people cannot repent. Rather, Jesus states this truth in order to prick sinners’ hearts and lead them to repent of ignoring the commands of God in order to preserve the traditions of men (Mark 7:6-13, R#3&4).

U – The only Scripture cited as specifically supporting this point is R#21, but only if universal salvation is also accepted as being taught by the reference to all/many, but Rom. 5:17 limits the many to those who receive God’s grace, and Rom. 4:16 & 5:1 teach that grace is received through faith, making it the condition for reception (s/e).

L – In Matt. 20:28 Jesus said that his life is given as a ransom for many (stated also in Heb. 9:28), but this does not preclude anyone who has faith being included, and Scriptures such as 1Tim. 2:3-4 indicate God’s desire for all to become “many” (John 3:16, Acts 2:21, 1John 2:2), indicating that although Christ’s death atoned for the sins of all humanity only for those who accept Jesus as Messiah does it result in forgiveness (s/e, R#14&18).

I – Phil. 2:13 says that God works in believers to will and act according to His good purpose, but this does not mean that believers do not willingly cooperate (R#23).

P – John 10:27-29 states that Jesus gives his sheep eternal life, and no one can snatch them, which is stated by Paul in Romans 8:35-39 as being separated from the love of God in Christ. However, there are numerous Scriptures indicating that a believer may not persevere (including John 8:31, Matt. 10:22& Heb. 10:36), so although God gives endurance per Rom. 15:4-5, it too must be received through continued faith (2Cor. 5:7) “from first to last” (Rom. 1:17).

M – Gen. 2:17 begins the biblical revelation of God’s moral nature and requirement and is followed up by Gen. 6:5-6 revealing that God is grieved by sin, which truth Paul noted in Eph. 4:30. A main point of the Sermon on the Mount (Matt. 5-7) per Jesus in Matt. 5:20 is that souls should be righteous, and main point of the Sermon on Salvation (Rom. 1-11) per Paul in Rom. 3:21-22 is that righteousness is attained through faith in Jesus as Lord (cf. Acts 16:30-31).

F – Deut. 30:19 is one of the clearest statements of the condition of volition in Scripture, and Jesus lamented the sinful misuse of this divine gift in Matt. 23:37. Jesus commanded the correct application of volition in Matt. 7:7 (cf. Heb. 11:6). Paul indicates that God enables sinners to seek salvation in Rom. 2:4, where he says that God’s kindness toward sinners leads them toward repentance. In 1Tim. 2:3-4 Paul taught that God wants all souls to be saved, but he lamented that many resisted God’s will in Acts 28:26-27, like Jesus did in Matt. 13:14-15.

W – The short version of Paul’s Sermon on Salvation in Romans is found in Eph. 2:8-10, which states that God’s grace is received through faith, not works, implying that the condition of cooperating (called partnership in Phil. 1:4-5, cf. 2:12-13) with God both by professing Christ at conversion (from first/first day) and by producing the fruit of the Spirit during sanctification (to last/the day of Christ Jesus) is NOT meritorious or a reason to think salvation is earned (Rom. 1:17). However, choosing to disbelieve God or resist His kindness does manifest spiritual separation from His blessings and warrant eventual experiencing of divine wrath per Rom. 2:4-6 (cf. Matt. 23:37).
 
Sinful humanity retains the image of God or MFW, so every normal adult soul is able by faith to choose between the two options in Deut. 30:19. That is why Paul went “every Sabbath to the synagogue, trying to persuade Jews and Greeks” (Acts 18:4). “He witnessed to them from morning till evening, explaining about the kingdom of God, and from the Law of Moses and from the Prophets he tried to persuade them about Jesus.” (Acts 28:23b) “Some were convinced by what he said, but others would not believe. (Acts 28:24) They disagreed among themselves and began to leave after Paul made this final statement: The HS spoke the truth to your ancestors when he said through Isaiah the prophet, “You will be ever hearing but never understanding; you will be ever seeing but never perceiving, for this people’s heart has become calloused.” (Acts 28:25-27a)

IOW, God initiates/calls; sinners may cooperate/heed--or not (Matt. 23:37).