Originally Posted by DiscipleDave![]()
![]()
Wow, another one who lacks the understanding of the TRUTH. Tell me Which one of these two verses do YOU say is TRUE, and which one is false.
Luk_23:43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.
or
Mat_12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
So tell me, which one is TRUE. BOTH can't be True. When Jesus was Crucified did He go to Paridise that same day or was He in the heart of the Earth that day as He said He would be, So which is it?
^i^
Both are true and you just equated Jesus and the bible to lies.....congrats...by your own doctrine you just sealed your fate!
Where do you place the Two Witnesses?
![]()
Unfortunately many translations do not accurately show that the events in revelation were "about to" happen shortly after John wrote:
Rev 1:19 (Young's Literal) 'Write the things that thou hast seen, and the things that are, and the things that are about to come after these things.
I am not meaning to start a ruckus here but your timeline is entirely formed on the wrong reason for the Scripture. The Bible is about God's salvation or Gospel if you will. Man tries to make it about himself and the things on the earth he has made like nations and science and things of man's pride. The 1000 years is not some future millennial reign. It began on the day of Pentecost. That is when satan was bound as evidenced by the dramatic increase in believers after the comforter came. Contradictions come from your timeline when those that are killed during the great tribulation live and reign for a 1000 years, which throws off your millennial reign timeframe. Look up the term "last day" in the Bible. It is used only eight times and proves the day of resurrection is Judgement day. The thousand years is a parable which depicts the church age. Satan is released and the tribulation comes. Once the Holy Spirit is removed from the churches, (I refer to the abomination of desolation when Satan has infiltrated and controls the churches) hardly anyone will be saved. Only a remnant. Just like when Jesus walked this earth. The church was controlled by all the "highly educated men" like it is today. Us like Peter are not ruined by the teachings of all these highly educated PHD's and such. And to prove it in the Bible, the example of Paul stands out. A highly educated man that Jesus took by force and blinded him to the worldly ways of the church that he might believe. When you read about the lion lying down with the lamb, you automatically think of man's way of peace and bliss. What the Bible is talking about there is Satan as a roaring lion in the church of the lamb. Please accept my post with the humble love with which I submit it. I could go into much more detail and quote pages of Scripture to proof this, but people usually get bored or lose their attention span as I do when things get too long and complicated. If you are a true believer, God will reveal his truth to you in your time of prayerful Bible study by the Holy Spirit.
The 1000 years is not some future millennial reign. It began on the day of Pentecost.
The thousand years is a parable which depicts the church age.
Please accept my post with the humble love with which I submit it. I could go into much more detail and quote pages of Scripture to proof this, but people usually get bored or lose their attention span as I do when things get too long and complicated.
If you are a true believer, God will reveal his truth to you in your time of prayerful Bible study by the Holy Spirit.
Unfortunately many translations do not accurately show that the events in revelation were "about to" happen shortly after John wrote:
Rev 1:19 (Young's Literal) 'Write the things that thou hast seen, and the things that are, and the things that are about to come after these things.
I see a crucial problem in the timeline chart. 6000 years, 6 days, then seven years, then one thousand more years, the 7th day. Where does the 7 years fit in if it is not contained in the 6th or 7th day?It is contained in the 6th day.
That is why when we try to explain it from man's viewpoint, we have to reach to make things work out.
If you think that is what i have done, then reveal where i have done that. Thanks.
The nation of Israel represents the Old Testament church age. And it ended when Christ died on the cross
lol. it began when He died on the Cross. Prior to the Church age was the Temple/Law age. MOSES was NOT a part of the Church Age. The Church which Jesus began, consists of Christians. Those who believe in Christ. Prior to Christ could not have been the Church Age, because prior to Christ there were no Christians. Read the New Testament, it is all about setting up the CHURCH for the Church Age. Even the Apostle Paul taught us how to set up Churches. Strange thing for him to do, if the Church Age had already ended, don't you think?
The nation of Israel represents the Old Testament church age. And it ended when Christ died on the cross (the veil of the temple was rent in two which separated the Holy of Holies from everything else. Christ bridged that gap and the New Testament church came in to being (upon this Rock {Christ} I will build my church.
And YOU think this NEW Church is NOT the beginning of the Church Age. There is NOT ONE verse in all of the old Testament which states the word Church. You do error in thinking the Church Age ended at the cross. It began at the cross, that is the TRUTH.
Both come to an end. The Old Testament church at the Cross.
The Old Testament CHURCH? really, that is what you came up with? Where are any Scriptures whatsoever that teach there was a Church in the Old Testament. There was, nor ever has been a Church in the Old Testament. But you say and teach there is an Old Testament CHURCH. This thinking is from your own mind or it was told to you by another person. This is in no way Scriptural at all. You say the Church Age ended at the cross because that is what fits into your OWN beliefs of what you THINK the TRUTH is.
The New Testament church when Satan is loosed and infiltrates the churches (the great tribulation). That is the "abomination of desolation " referred to by the Prophets.
According to you. Not Scriptures.
That is the great tribulation.
According to you. Not Scriptures.
People will trust in the church like they did in the days of Christ, and think they are saved, but it is the path that leads to destruction.
This is TRUE.
See Matthew 7, but be prepared to be terrified. That is why we are flee to Judea, flee from these false churches. We are to forsake not the assembling or ourselves to God. (Take out the italicized words in the KJV as they were incorrectly added there by the translators).
So what Thousands of Christian brothers and sisters believed was the Word of God and TRUE for over 400 years, according to you they were all wrong because the translators were wrong? So YOU can't possible believe this verse:
2Ti_3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
You seem to think God allowed errors into His Word that would be around for 400+ years, and until His Son Returns. i mean if God allowed those translators to incorrectly translate something, then God allowed them to do so. What? God didn't KNOW they were translating incorrectly? Or is the TRUTH of the matter. God made sure that the Bible that would remain for 400 plus years till His Son Returns was EXACTLY as He wanted it to be. Leave it to the last days generation to not believe something written in the Word to say the Word of God was mistranslated, save for punctuation's, that is untrue.
Once again I beg of you to prayerfully consider the 8 verses in the Bible containing the word "last day" singular. That is where the Bible proves that chart and timeline are incorrect.
It proves it? Really? Proves it, how? i know that the last day is singular, it is the Day of Judgement. Let me revise the diagram to reflect the Last Day, and when that DAY takes place. updated Timeline will be uploaded shortly.
I can further explain, but could never convince anyone. Only those who are God's elect will have their Spiritual eyes and ears opened to see and hear the truth. Others will continue in false beliefs which is also God's will for those who are not the elect.
Last Two sentences are True Statements.
^i^
††† In His Holy and Precious Name, Jesus Christ †††
DiscipleDave
I think you are missing the whole point of what 'Last Day' is all about. It represents a literal day - the day Christ returns - that "ends" the current "dispensation" ( if you want to call it that ) - and "begins" the next - which is the 1000-year reign of Christ on the Earth. That is why it is called 'Last Day'. There can be no time between the Last Day and the Millennium --- because, it literally is the transition into the Millennium.Updated Timeline adding the Last Day into where it will be.
![]()
If Anyone can show me Scriptures which proves something in this picture is not correct, i would like to see it, please.
Please keep personal opinions, personal interpretations, personal thoughts, personal beliefs, out of it. Please just show me Scriptures which proves something in the picture below is not accurate.
View attachment 141823
I believe that the time of the Two Witnesses coincides with the Trumpet events.Good question. He never told me that. Thoughts?
I think you are missing the whole point of what 'Last Day' is all about.
It represents a literal day - the day Christ returns - that "ends" the current "dispensation" ( if you want to call it that )
- and "begins" the next - which is the 1000-year reign of Christ on the Earth.
That
is why it is called 'Last Day'. There can be no time between the Last Day and the Millennium --- because, it literally is the transition into the Millennium.
Originally Posted by DiscipleDave![]()
![]()
If Anyone can show me Scriptures which proves something in this picture is not correct, i would like to see it, please.
Please keep personal opinions, personal interpretations, personal thoughts, personal beliefs, out of it. Please just show me Scriptures which proves something in the picture below is not accurate.
Sadly, the entire chart is a mess.
Daniel's 70 weeks ended at the stoning of Stephen, the first martyr after Jesus.
There were 490 continuous years. The "Great Tribulation" applied only to Israel and specifically Jerusalem - "only those in Judea" were told to flee. "Not one stone left on top of another" this applies to the Temple and the whole city. "When you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies" etc.
Because of Daniel's pleading for the forgiveness of his nation, God allowed Israel to be restored to their land and He gave them 490 years to: finish the transgression, make reconciliation for iniquity and to anoint the Most Holy, etc. Israel never made reconciliation for their iniquity. Instead, they killed their Messiah then started killing His messengers. Because of this, God punished them with the Great Tribulation (Mat 24:21) and scattered them for 1,900 years leaving no stone left of their city.
If one does not understand this basic fact that the Great Tribulation was back in 66-73 AD,
and instead looks for a future Great Tribulation, one will end up drawing a completely incorrect chart such as the one posted above.
I believe that the time of the Two Witnesses coincides with the Trumpet events.
I believe that the Two Witnesses actually cause the Trumpet events to occur, by virtue of the power of their prophecy.
Read Revelation 11:3,6-7. Then, read Revelation 8:7-12. Notice the detail in the descriptions of both passages.
Then, notice in Revelation 9:1-2 how that the bottomless pit is opened...
Then, read Revelation 11:7 again.
See anything interesting about the timing of the death of the Two Witnesses and the bottomless pit - and the Trumpet events?
When is the bottomless pit opened? ( Trumpet 5 )
Who kills the two witnesses? ( the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit )
At / After what point in [ prophetic ] time are the Two Witnesses killed? ( Trumpet 5 )
Do you think, perhaps, that Revelation 11:6 is a good "short description" of the more detailed description(s) given in Revelation 8:7-12?
![]()
