I think the symbolism of the location speaks volumesYes, that's incredibly sad to see but no different than America or many other countries.
I think the symbolism of the location speaks volumesYes, that's incredibly sad to see but no different than America or many other countries.
It might be appropriate to turn away. I'll probably have nightmares just witnessing these interactions.
I think the symbolism of the location speaks volumes
@HeIsHere i'm beginning to think you may be right that this account is an AI bot. It's answers are too off-the-wall and anti-Christian to be real.
Look are you capable of getting off that Galatians 3:28 hobby horse one trick pony?
Is Paul as biblically illiterate as you say he is?
There is an entire Bible that MUST harmonize, including ALL of the OT prophecies.
And the replacement theologians will NEVER rightly understand the whole of it.
Act 22:3
I am verily a man which am a Jew, born in Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, and taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the fathers, and was zealous toward God, as ye all are this day.
Act 21:39
But Paul said, I am a man which am a Jew of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people.
Act 18:2
And he found a certain Jew named Aquila, born in Pontus, who had recently come from Italy with his wife Priscilla (because Claudius had commanded all the Jews to depart from Rome); and he came to them.
Act 18:24
Now a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man and mighty in the Scriptures, came to Ephesus.
Act 19:34
But when they found out that he was a Jew, all with one voice cried out for about two hours, “Great is Diana of the Ephesians!”
I think the symbolism of the location speaks volumes
Our brother has been here for a long time. I'd say long before HisH but this may be their second or third account. Absolutely not an Ai bot. Ridiculous.
He said I was dead wrong by saying "the sins of unbelievers in Israel are not removed by the new covenant." Do you agree with him?
https://christianchat.com/threads/revolution-in-iran.222083/post-5731855Umm you forgot to harmonize.
Seems obvious to me his maintaining his Jewish identity for the sake of the expansion of the Gospel to the Jews.
Obviously things did not change over night, and there were even those of Jewish heritage were reverting back to the Law (See Hebrews)
Really sad you do not understand the period of transition God allowed before He used Rome to show His judgement.
You know what else is sad and really dumb in dispensationalism having people in a state of blindness for 2000 + years for something they probably have very little knowledge about and were not present for... that is why it is >>>> "This generation!"
This god of dispensationalism is a covert Calvinist it seems, keeping people blind for millenia.
Wrong again as usual.Can't be clearer evidence than this that you are not following the faith and gospel of Christ
@cv5 said: (edited for emphasis)He said I was dead wrong by saying "the sins of unbelievers in Israel are not removed by the new covenant." Do you agree with him?
There won't BE any "unbelievers" at the time when the NATION receives their Messiah Kinsman Redeemer and King.
The ENTIRE NATION will be saved "in that day". Henceforth forever.
Do you believe in coincidences?
it is all about the pre-trib rapture. I cannot believe people still believe Hal Lindsay.
Do you think that's what's behind all of this madness? Easy believism without the cross?
For the billionth time, no one has said Jews can come any other way but through the cross!!