And again another reason why Saturday is a shadow to teach men what is to come.
A shadow? Yes.
Something to still be honored? Yes.
And again another reason why Saturday is a shadow to teach men what is to come.
That day will start with the global economic collapse. Then all work of men will be halted.A shadow? Yes.
Something to still be honored? Yes.
I would say 'us" refers to Christians, especially Gentile Christians for the OT law was not given to Gentiles...."that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:" Eph 2:11,12.Who were the "us" in Colossians 2:14? My understanding is, Paul was speaking to Colossians and the verse was referring to Colossians. In other words, pagans, the people who worshipped idols and did everything the Holy One of Israelites spoke against in the "OT". They had no hope and were to be "eliminated" by the Holy nation. For example Jericho and Ai.
It's different now that Christ has come to save the world, including idol worshipping pagans, if only we separate ourselves from the unclean just as Paul said in 2 Corinthians 6:17. From this perspective, perhaps one would understand Colossians 2:16 differently.
Does anyone what verse in the NT commands us to worship on Sunday?
Back in those days many Israelites were in a different time zone tooThe question then becomes what are we to teach? For when we teach, do we not also teach ourselves? For those who teach not to break the sabbath as they see it, do they break the sabbath?
Is is it not also written that the priests profane the sabbath and are blameless? Again I say we must know what the true sabbath is in order to obey it correctly. This day will be unmistakably different from anything any man has seen. I've seen many Saturdays in my young life and in this evil world, bills are still due that day too! Plus when it's Saturday for me, then somewhere across the globe it's not for someone else. Is he breaking the sabbath due to being in another time zone?
That's right. We gentiles are the ones "OT" law were against and were to be "eliminated" by the Holy Nation but now through Christ there's no more hostility between the two. Do we see that's the law spoken about in Colossians 2:14?I would say 'us" refers to Christians, especially Gentile Christians for the OT law was not given to Gentiles...."that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:" Eph 2:11,12.
The law, not being given to Gentiles, made Gentiles "aliens from the commonwealth, strangers from the covenant of promise, having no hope and without God. So that OT law was very much against the Gentiles.
Acts 10:7 "And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued his speech until midnight."
The verb phrase "came together" is passive voice meaning it was not the disciples own decision to come together on the first day of the week but they were brought passively together by someone outside of them, namely God brought His disciples together on the first day of the week. It would be a binding example for disciples today.
Three questions:Acts 10:7 "And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued his speech until midnight."
The verb phrase "came together" is passive voice meaning it was not the disciples own decision to come together on the first day of the week but they were brought passively together by someone outside of them, namely God brought His disciples together on the first day of the week. It would be a binding example for disciples today.
Three questions:
a. How long was the gathering?
b. Did they have dinner or lunch?
c. Was it a Saturday night or a Sunday night?
I have no doubt that God would have called them together to meet on that day, but it still isn't an instruction for lasting generations to get together and do the exact same thing they were doing for a specific and unique purpose.
And again another reason why Saturday is a shadow to teach men what is to come.
As a binding example, I see no reason it would not be lasting.
Then wouldn't Jesus' and Paul's example of being in the temple teaching, as well as the disciples observance of the OT feast of Shavuot/Pentectost be binding as well?
I think the concern is that all throughout Scripture, both OT and NT, when God gives and instruction to His people it is pretty clear that He is giving an instruction and is stated as such. In this case it seems to be more of an account of what they were doing rather than a binding command for Christians to do the same thing for a special and unique purpose for all time.
Again, I have no problem with worshiping on ANY day of the week. God is certainly worth or praise 24/7. But I think it's erroneous to say that to worship on Sunday is more Biblical than honoring the Sabbath.
Three questions:
a. How long was the gathering?
b. Did they have dinner or lunch?
c. Was it a Saturday night or a Sunday night?
a) it does not say how long but long enough for them to worship.
b) it does not say
c) first day of the week, Sunday.
As a binding example, I see no reason it would not be lasting.
In the great commission, disciples are to go to all the world to preach the gospel to every creature, so Christians can teach in a temple, in an upper room, from a boat, anywhere. The OT law was taken out of the way by Christ and not binding upon NT Christians.
God brought His disciples together on the first day of the week. A disciple is a pupil, a follower of one's instructions. How then can I claim to be a disciple of God if I am not following the instruction given to God's disciples to assemble on the first day of the week? I see no where in God's word that God left the assembling of Acts 20:7 open to the opinion of the disciple.
As a binding example, I see no reason it would not be lasting.
And I would disagree with you here because nowhere does Jesus take the Law "out of the way".
And by using your example of reasoning saying that because the disciples were gathered on the first day of the week, that it is an instruction binding on Christians today, the same reasoning would apply to Jesus and the disciples gathering on the Sabbath in the temples, and keeping the Biblical Feast Days.
So, the Laws are all done away, but a mistranslated and misunderstood passage is binding forever?
Col 2:14; Heb 10:9. In Col 2:154 the verb "took" is perfect tense denoting a action in the past with a continuing effect, took it out of the way permanently.
So the OT is not binding upon Christians. So if I read in the bible of Jew who was under and keeping the OT law in feasts, animal sacrifices, purifications, etc that is not binding upon me for that law was not given to me to keep and, as already noted, Christ took that law of out of the way making it inactive, of no effect. The NT law that Christian are under, including Acts 20:7 would be binding upon Christians. When did the Master bring His NT disciples together, as in Acts 20:7, any day other than the first day of the week? He did not. So again, how can one call himself a disciple of the Master if he is not following the Master's instructions?
On one occasion, Paul wanted to attend Pentecost in Jerusalem. He knew there would be many Lost Jews there to whom he had a great opportunity to preach the gospel to them. Does this mean I must keep Pentecost as the OT law directs? No, for (1) Christ took that law out of the way, (2) Paul, as no Christian, is obligated by God in the NT to keep Pentecost, (3) Paul was just using it as an opportunity to preach the gospel.