M
I never said anything about contradiction.
You have a problem with comprehension of words.Nowhere does Paul say grace excludes obedience to God.
Grace is a free gift that comes with conditions and those that meet the conditions of believing, repenting, confessing and submitting baptism receive grace.
I'm not against good works. However,
look at all the hatred on these threads. Those aren't good works.
I'm sure the Judaizers felt Paul was also guilty of hatred of them,Maybe you have confused good works with intense disagreement. Even your statement here alone smacks of self righteousness as if not to include yourself with those you are pointing fingers at. I may not post much in these forums but I certainly read a good deal of them. I've seen you give as good as you get.
So the Power to keep oneself if based out of your good Works?
Your going to have a hard time Explaining that to the Risen Redeemer, when His Word tells us and those who are Led of Him know that its 'because of Him' we are kept unto Salvation... this the Redemption of the body, Resurrection Body..
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: vDispb, bgcolor: #F5F5F5"]Now unto -----> HIM (you seabass)??? or God?? that is ABLE to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of His Glory with Exceeding joy, JUDE 1: 24
TO remain a Christian, is in the Power of the LORD, for he/she is KEPT BY THE POWER OF GOD, its not their good works 'keeping them'... Good Works were ordained for them to Walk in ONCE THEY WERE REGENERATED.....
you will have hard time explaining this to the Risen Savior! indeed![/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Straw man.
The issue is by grace alone through faith (Eph 2:8-9), the issue is not by works alone.
You have a problem with comprehension of words.
It's not free if conditions must be met.
Yes, only Scripture is my spiritual authority for faith, doctrine and godliness,Problematic if one claims Sola scriptura
Check out the NT. . .the Pharisees persecuted Jesus, not vice versa
It's not free grace unless it's alone. . .not by physical actions of righteousness (Eph 2:8-9).You added the word "alone" to God's word in EPh 2:8 thereby changing it. When you change God's word you no longer have God's word.
That's not the meaning of "free."You still refuse to understand the simple concept that free gifts can and do come with conditions.
It's not free grace unless it's alone. . .not by physical actions of righteousness (Eph 2:8-9).
That's not the meaning of "free."
Conditions = merit if the gift is withheld because of lack of the conditions.
Grace is totally without merit.
So you speculate that if Naaman had not obeyed the instructions he would not have been healed.Naaman was free, God did not charge Naaman anything for his free healing.Elin said:That's not the meaning of "free."
Conditions = merit if the gift is withheld because of lack of the conditions.
Grace is totally without merit.
Well i am finally able to be back on the line and i come here to find the same old argument. How about i put this stupid argument to bed once and for all.....SALVATION IS NOT POSSIBLE WITHOUT JESUS!!!! Enough said.![]()
Well i am finally able to be back on the line and i come here to find the same old argument. How about i put this stupid argument to bed once and for all.....SALVATION IS NOT POSSIBLE WITHOUT JESUS!!!! Enough said.![]()