I am sure that we can all agree that the Bible is God inspired. How then can we say that the controversial book Song of Solomon was about his wife? Also knowing that he had so many of them? Would this book then still be God inspired? The Bible is full of symbolism, I am certain we can all agree to this as well. Could it be that this book is an allusion to Christ's love for the church, the bridegroom to the bride? Is that why the men who compiled scripture included this book in the Bible? What are your thoughts? I'll share some of mine.
Below are just a couple of many likenesses that I notice between Song of Solomon and other scripture.
Paul says here, it is a great mystery, that he is speaking concerning Christ and the church, then continues in the next verse with nevertheless (as in saying still, yet, or in spite of this...).
Another thing I notice is that Song of Solomon starts out differently then the other two books traditionally attributed to King Solomon. Ecclesiastes and Proverbs begin by declaring him son of David and King, while Song of Solomon does not.
This book was either God inspired or (wo)man inspired, and if it wasn't God inspired why was it included in the Bible?
Below are just a couple of many likenesses that I notice between Song of Solomon and other scripture.
Song of Solomon 4
[SUP]7 [/SUP]Thou art all fair, my love; there is no spot in thee.
Ephesians 5
[SUP]25 [/SUP]Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
[SUP]26 [/SUP]That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,
[SUP]27 [/SUP]That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.
[SUP]28 [/SUP]So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.
[SUP]29 [/SUP]For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church:
[SUP]30 [/SUP]For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.
[SUP]31 [/SUP]For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.
[SUP]32 [/SUP]This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.
[SUP]33 [/SUP]Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.
Paul says here, it is a great mystery, that he is speaking concerning Christ and the church, then continues in the next verse with nevertheless (as in saying still, yet, or in spite of this...).
Song of Solomon 4
[SUP]15 [/SUP]A fountain of gardens, a well of living waters, and streams from Lebanon.
John 4
[SUP]9 [/SUP]Then saith the woman of Samaria unto him, How is it that thou, being a Jew, askest drink of me, which am a woman of Samaria? for the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans.
[SUP]10[/SUP]Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water.
[SUP]11 [/SUP]The woman saith unto him, Sir, thou hast nothing to draw with, and the well is deep: from whence then hast thou that living water?
[SUP]12 [/SUP]Art thou greater than our father Jacob, which gave us the well, and drank thereof himself, and his children, and his cattle?
[SUP]13 [/SUP]Jesus answered and said unto her, Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again:
[SUP]14 [/SUP]But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.
Another thing I notice is that Song of Solomon starts out differently then the other two books traditionally attributed to King Solomon. Ecclesiastes and Proverbs begin by declaring him son of David and King, while Song of Solomon does not.
This book was either God inspired or (wo)man inspired, and if it wasn't God inspired why was it included in the Bible?