Evolution doesn't teach that any more
IT NEVER DID TEACH THAT.
but it certainly incited/justified the mass killings of black people world-wide, particularly in Tasmania, Australia. Eugenics etc. go hand in hand with such ungodly beliefs.
We use physics to create more powerful guns and more accurate bombs. We use chemistry to create poisons. Do we blame the science? No, we blame the people who misuse science. If people look at the theory of evolution and they want to create the perfect human race, then it doesn't do anything to prove or disprove the validity of science.
But, let's be clear here, people who support eugenics DO NOT understand the theory of evolution. The theory of evolution NEVER suggested one race of human to be superior to another race of human.
1. I understand that many slave owners were Christian but were they just Christians by name or also by faith in Christ? People use the Bible to justify anything, it doesn't mean the Bible condones it.
Evolution doesn't condone eugenics. But there are people who used evolution to support their racial views.
You have double standards. When a person claiming to be Christian does something wrong, you say they misinterpreted the Bible and it's their fault. When a person claiming to be an evolutionist does something wrong, you blame evolution entirely.
Also, this excellent book, "One Human Family" by Carl Wieland.
After reading the provided sample pages in which Carl discusses evolution, all I can say is that you have been duped. Carl doesn't understand the theory of evolution, and he passed his ignorance down as knowledge to you. Tintin, please study evolution, not creationist apologetics. Even if you aren't convinced, you'll at least learn what evolution actually suggests - which will allow you to stop making such ridiculous errors.
You're not uneducated, you're miseducated.
Not only did it teach that there were lesser races, but also that women were not as evolved as men:
You fall into the same boat as Tintin. The source you provided is nothing more than creationist apologetics written by a man who doesn't understand the theory of evolution. If he does understand the theory of evolution, then he's clearly a manipulative liar.
Stop studying evolution as taught by creationists. Study evolution as taught by those who actually support the theory. If you do this, you'll find that the creationists who write about evolution don't even understand what the theory of evolution actually suggests.
This is a school we are talking about. Homosexuality is a sexual perversion....we ain't built that way. This is taking young impressionable minds and filling them with perversion....
IT IS ILLEGAL FOR AN ADULT TO HAVE SEX WITH MINORS IN MOST, IF NOT EVERY STATE IN THE USA......AND THEY HAVE GAY GROUPS IN SCHOOLS???????
One is sex between two consenting people, the other is sex with a minor. Big difference.
A minor is not old enough to make their own decisions. Adults are. Comparing homosexuality to pedophilia is asinine.
Furthermore, you keep calling homosexuality perversion. It's only perversion in the same sense heterosexuality is perversion. Two men want to have sex, in the same way a man and a woman has sex.
To argue homosexuality is like pedophilia is a completely nonsensical argument founded on the fact you dislike one, you dislike the other, therefore they're both related. But a person using your incredibly flawed logic could draw the same conclusions about heterosexuality.
Do you know how many adult men rape women? One could easily argue heterosexuality leads to rape. Do you see the flaw in such an argument? If you do, then why are you incapable of seeing similar flaws in your own absurd logic?
If you believe homosexuality is a sin because God said it's a sin - then fair enough. But don't try to come up with other nonsensical reasons to justify your point. For example, you say men and women were designed to have sex with each other, not with those of the same sex. This is a nonsensical argument because a.) we constantly do things that aren't natural that isn't sinful, and b.) whether or not something is natural is not a basis of morality.
Again, if you believe homosexuality is a sin because God said so - make that your point. Stop trying to find other ways in which homosexuality is wrong - as if there are other reasons to oppose homosexuality. Let's face it, there aren't any. The only reason to oppose homosexuality is because it's a sin - and if you don't believe it's a sin, then you're not going to find a justified objective reason to speak against homosexuality.
If you're a Christian and homosexuality is a sin - then that's where you need to stand, that it's a sin. That's the only reason that should matter to you.
has been suspended following a Facebook post he made regarding the school's Gay-Straight Alliance student club.
