Maybe she is mentally ill... or maybe she is using the child to hurt her ex in this wayPlease God help this man and his sons, please fight this battle for them, in Jesus Name we pray
![]()
Maybe she is mentally ill... or maybe she is using the child to hurt her ex in this wayPlease God help this man and his sons, please fight this battle for them, in Jesus Name we pray
![]()
Yes, I totally agree with you, and prayer is what is needed in this situation. I also find it very refreshing to see you say a prayer right here for them....That's awesome...GBYMaybe she is mentally ill... or maybe she is using the child to hurt her ex in this wayPlease God help this man and his sons, please fight this battle for them, in Jesus Name we pray
![]()
This is child abuse, mental illness and utter madness....It's sick out there, and getting sicker!
Britain’s First Transgender Couple to Allow Their 5-Year-Old Child to Begin Transition
Claim they didn’t encourage the transition.
![]()
Published
1 day ago
on
2 December, 2019
Paul Joseph Watson
![]()
Britain’s first transgender couple have stoked controversy by revealing that they will allow their 5-year-old child to also begin gender transition.
Jody, 21, and Greg Rogers, 27, from Glasgow in Scotland went public with the announcement that their son Jayden has begun transitioning into a girl.
The couple claimed that they were subjected to abuse since making the announcement and that they had also been reported to social services.
The couple denied claims they had encouraged the transition, with Greg Rogers telling the Daily Record, “We’ve had people saying we’re using Jayden for attention and that she just wants to be a girl because I changed sex…It’s ridiculous. Jayden knows nothing about my past. She just knows me as dad.”
According to the couple, Jayden is adamant he is a girl and loves dressing up as Princess Anna from the Disney film Frozen.
“They say it’s cruel we let her wear a dress but is it not more cruel to do nothing when you’ve got a kid who’s so adamant she’s a girl she’s ripping her hair off and banging her head off the walls?” said Rogers.
Earlier this year, it was revealed that five people working at Britain’s only NHS transgender clinic had quit after children as young as three were being through unnecessary gender reassignment treatment.
“Referrals to the clinic risen in recent years, with 94 in 2010, rising to 2,519 by last year, with the youngest patient aged just three,” reported the Daily Mail.
You can’t stop progress!
As it was in the days of Noah, so will it be at the coming of the Son of ManReferring to the article "Britain’s First Transgender Couple to Allow Their 5-Year-Old Child to Begin Transition", this article is more proof and evidence this world has fallen off the map, for lack of a better expression. What a truly messed up world we live in. Utter madness and insanity on a exponential scale.
And because it is deemed politically correct and an example of tolerance.Reading that article about the judge concerned being removed from the case, I wonder what kind of judge is now gonna be appointed.
I think now, in my opinion, this world as it is has now reached the point that the majority of the people will now be ready to submit to the coming beast system.
<<Click for articleBaphomet is a good guess as to a look alike character.The way that drag queen is dressed appears to be a representation of Baphomet. And to me, it seems the altering of creation is what the world is about today.
Now to me, there are certain boundaries that cannot be stepped over, but I think in today's time period, we have stepped over that boundary to a great degree.
Now going by what happen in the days of Lot, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, and going by what is said in Jude 1.7, it stands to reason there will be retribution, question is when and how.
UPDATE: The father lost the case.![]()
https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com...to-transition-her-7-year-old-son-into-a-girl/2 FEB 2020 Last week, thank God, a judge overturned the jury’s ruling. ......
This also means that Ann will now be blocked from “transitioning” James to a girl using hormone therapy.
Yes, but it is only when one of the parents object that the case becomes public and nothing ensures that the child wants to undergo the medical treatment. Yet the reason this case proceeded to Court is not due to a lack of legislation prohibiting experimental medical procedures but rather the regulations which allow it to go on. As I'll discuss further in my comment to Ed Penn regarding his post, the State's Child Protection Services didn't get involve because it wasn't specifically prohibited but rather would suggest that they couldn't get involved due to is specifically permitted.The court will rule that gender transition is an individual choice that can not be made on behalf of a minor by one or both parents or legal guardians, nor by the state; therefore since the child is not of age of majority the court will deny the petition of the boy's mother.That sounds correct. A parent should not be making a decision like that on a minors behalf.
It looks like the Texas Gov. is going to try and stop this mammoth evil.
A 7-year-old child doesn't have the maturity to make profound decisions like this. The state of Texas should protect this child's right to choose—as an informed, mature person—and not be used as a pawn in a left-wing political agenda. #ProtectJamesYounger
7:01 PM · Oct 23, 2019·Twitter for iPhone
Thank God little James is safe. And this case generated good news for children across the country.Thank you for your original post bringing attention to the matter.
But the gospel doesn't come in word only but in the power of truth that will ultimately prevail where labor is taken to bring it to light.
UPDATE:
https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com...to-transition-her-7-year-old-son-into-a-girl/
While James is protected in this case, the lack of acknowledgement by the members of the forum is someone what disheartening, even the lack of follow-up on the thread. However, apathy is a common affliction.
@Susanna
Yes, but it is only when one of the parents object that the case becomes public and nothing ensures that the child wants to undergo the medical treatment. Yet the reason this case proceeded to Court is not due to a lack of legislation prohibiting experimental medical procedures but rather the regulations which allow it to go on. As I'll discuss further in my comment to Ed Penn regarding his post, the State's Child Protection Services didn't get involve because it wasn't specifically prohibited but rather would suggest that they couldn't get involved due to is specifically permitted.
And you think that the Executive sphere infringing upon the Judicial sphere by initiating an investigation against a litigant in an active court case is conducive to good government? While I will think no less of you if you do, but then do you agree that the Judicial sphere infringing upon the Legislative sphere by enacting laws with court rulings instead of ruling on the legality of the law is just as acceptable?
But I guess you bought it, so what do you believe he was going to do issue a Royal decree and have the mother thrown into the lions den? I know you don't believe, or at least trust you don't , but you must have believed he was going to do something. But I can help but wonder what it would be since if the State's child protection services hadn't got involved by that time, then it couldn't have been due to the CPS being in unawares.
And if CPS didn't get involved then there was a reason. And if medical experimentation procedures are not prohibited then that wouldn't prevent CPS from getting involved, but if medical experimentation upon children is permitted by law then it would prohibit CPS from getting involved.
Do you know what medical research experiments are permitted on children in your state? But more importantly are they permitted by Legislative Act or by Treaty.
Thank God little James is safe. And this case generated good news for children across the country.
Definitely a cause for prayers.It will be interesting to see if the VCPA gets enacted. It goes before the Senate Committee tomorrow morning at 10 a.m.
It's just so odd. Role-play occurs with young children. This is not at all uncommon.
"Affirming" as is being described in this article is troubling.
(So sad that this is the madness we face. Pray that this father wins this court battle)
Texan father Jeff Younger will face a final court hearing this month that will determine if his 7-year-old son will stay a boy or change to a girl while his ex-wife petitions the court to allow the transition.
“James presents as a boy with me and he presents as a girl with his mom,” Younger said, according to CBN. “He gets dressed as a boy at his mother’s home and he comes out to me as a boy. That means that he’s comfortable as a boy at his mother’s home.”
Younger has said that his son only shows interest in being a girl around his mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas. While with Younger, James sword fights with his twin brother Jude and loves to wrestle.
According to LifeSite News, Younger has also been accused of child abuse for not treating James like a girl. So far, the court has not allowed him to treat James as a boy. He currently splits custody with his ex-wife for both James and Jude.
https://www.christianheadlines.com/...year-old-son-a-boy-in-final-court-battle.html
Thanks for caring enough to take the time to defend the Word of God.
We are here to help those who do not understand the ways of God.
Don't be discouraged by the world's temporary setbacks. God is still winning. Keep up the good work. It's not easy to read about these things and write about them.