TDW: SAID the Lk19:41-44 thing (both pertaining to "the city/Jerusalem," just as the Dan9:24-27 prophecy pertains)]
Yeah, like 70 AD. Jerusalem was burned (consumed by fire) and left desolate. When you have a perfectly good temple standing in what ever year Luke wrote
get burned to the ground a few short years later, why not run with it?
I've
stated repeatedly throughout this thread (though it does not seem you are hearing me), that "what Jesus SAID" on Palm Sunday
(Luke 19:41-44) IS talking about the events surrounding 70ad!! I've said that (how many times, now??) Along with these (ALSO pertaining to the events surrounding the 70ad events):
--Luke 21:23,20 "Jerusalem COMPASSED WITH ARMIES" (in the v.12-24a section--the 70ad section of the Olivet Discourse); AND
--Matthew 22:7 ("and the king
WAS WROTH...and SENT FORTH HIS ARMIES... and BURNED UP THEIR CITY"), but
not verse 8's "
THEN SAITH HE to his servants" ("THEN" means this came NEXT); AND
--Luke 19:41-44 which Jesus SAID on Palm Sunday (about the events surrounding 70ad events:
"thine enemies shall... COMPASS THEE ROUND")
...all re: the events surrounding 70ad.
Why look for some future 3rd temple that nobody wrote about and look for another burning? Can it be any clearer?
Where have I said that there is
"another burning" (like, of a temple or Jerusalem) in the sections NOT speaking of the events surrounding 70ad (in the Olivet Discourse, that's found only in Lk21:12-24a
=70ad events)?
In THOSE sections, it is Jesus telling about the "abomination [SINGULAR] of desolation [SINGULAR] spoken of by Daniel the prophet, which "SINGULAR" reference is found in Daniel 12:11 "abomination [
SINGULAR] which maketh desolate
SET UP [H5414]"
[and then supplies certain, very-specifically-worded "day-amounts" and very specific "events": Daniel being resurrected to "
stand in thy lot at the END of the days [/at the END of the days referred to IN THAT CONTEXT]," and the "BLESSED" aspect which
FOLLOWS these "judgment" periods (v.12), and so forth. (To conflate this with what Dan9:26
c says "desolaTION
S [
PLURAL] are determined" [with the 70ad events INCLUDED in THIS verse] is not correct, but know that THAT verse IS referring to "the events surrounding 70ad, PLUS... [continuing on,
following]")]
I'll try to come back later tonight (way later) with an illustration I've used in the past, to explain the chronology of the Olivet Discourse (where not all of it is speaking regarding the events surrounding 70ad--"the beginning of birth PANGS" are NOT, for example, but must FOLLOW the events of 70ad, in the SEQUENCE spelled out in the text)