The Covid CANCER Shot!
- Thread starter HealthAndHappiness
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
From the OP:
Study of 99 million COVID-vaccinated people finds links to brain, heart problems
source: The Washington Post
and
Study of 99 million COVID-vaccinated people finds links to brain, heart problems
source: The Washington Post
That caught me by surprise!
Good one.
I heard that this year's flu shot has that special ingredient for EXTRA Emotional Support.
Thanks for posting.
My hope is that this contribution will help save lives of others who also have concerns about the secret chemicals anonymous people inject into our families.
The CDC does not believe COVID does not exist. That was in reference to a certain form of the virus not available to them at the time. It needs to preface that in a research paper.
You need to be really out there to think the CDC would say that. Or you copied this information from someone that has no experience in research and believes they are clever. It is about PCR. Do you know what that is? I do, I used to do that all th time.
What CDC may or may or "believe" is irrelevant. The fact remains, there is no virus. Please prove otherwise by providing any source that claims to have an isolated sample of it. Even the "fact checkers" admit they don't have any sample of the so-called corona virus:
"...the CDC have used 'transcribed' RNA as the positive control - which means they used synthetically produced genetic material identical to that carried by the virus." - source. They are admitting they do not possess a sample of any so-called corona virus.
But wait! There's more! The very last sentence of the wicked "fact checkers" piece tries to 'kitchen sink' the hoax with this bald-faced lie:
"'There are now hundreds of stocks of cultured SARS-CoV-2 in laboratories around the world', he said."
O contrare! NOT ONE LABORATORY WORLDWIDE has any "stock" of any so-called corona virus:
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world (225 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever.
There's so much information thrown at us from different directions that it's hard to take the time to evaluate whether or not each source is valid.
For example, I heard interviews from research Drs who were advising against the mRNA injections who said the following. They claimed that the Covid 19 "virus " was a lab made weapon splicing various DNA from AIDs virus to XYZ. I have no way to verify those claims one way or another. Then there's the researchers who claimed that it was funded by a federal grant until funding was stopped for gain of function research. Then Fauci and company moved the materials to Wuhan China.
You've heard the story. Even Rand Paul went into details in his Senate Meetings when he interrogated fauci the weasel.
That said, I've also looked at the sources that say that there is no such thing as CV 19 and spike proteins resulting from it.
They are also convincing.
One reason is that they use Kary Mullis's PCR equipment as the basis of their claims. Before they assassinated him, The inventor himself said that fauci was a lying idiot. Dr Mullis was clear that the ones misunderstanding and missusing his PCR machine would not have been able to verify the presence of the supposed virus in people.
This one point holds weight as far as I'm concerned.
The other point of doubt for me is that computer generated images are shown as the proof for the so called isolated covid virus. They are very obvious illustrations. We are supposed to be impressed by their powers of science, so called, and go into a mesmerized state of delusions when presented with the propaganda. That has been the Medical/Gvt controlled media's expectations anyhow.
The answer might lie in the fact that people are simply being poisoned to death. Whether the poison(s) are chemicals or biologicals, I can only speculate.
The fact remains that mass murder has occured and continues to occur every time an innocent unsuspecting victim rolls up their sleeve for a nurse.
They both sing from the same hymn sheet.
More "useful idiots," desensitizing us to the brainwash.
Exactly. Just like the images, drawings, illustrations, renderings of globe earth and satellites i.e. no photographs of the world' s most notorious "virus."
Depopulation. He comes to steal and to kill and to destroy.
Both. Also synthetic biology.
Indeed. Caveat emptor.
I think it is simple really. The Covid vaccine is experimental. If you agree to take it you must waive your rights to sue them. Why would I waive my rights to sue a company that I don't trust? Second, by law they are required to provide all the research that has been done on the vaccine, instead they give people blank sheets of paper. So not only do I not trust them but they are behaving in a way that is illegal to hide the research. All the more reason not to trust them.
Synthetic biology is an oxymoron, but Satan twists and perverts life in every way imaginable.
We have some of the samples recorded in archives in this thread of actual video and photos of the white substance pulled from the veins of cadavers.
This is of more validity than the illustrations, yet, the pharma controlled media have intentionally swept it under the rug.
The pharmaceutical companies even admitted that they were experimental. That consent to taking the lives of those ignorant of Satan's devices doesn't eliminate culpability. We will not see justice until the Lord returns.
Then Jesus will condemn those responsible. This is our hope, confidence.
Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. (Rom. 12:19)
It is called a COVID test. I do lab work and you have plenty of samples full of verifiable COVID strains using PCR.
Please do not make false statements. It was not said there was no COVID stocks. The CDC paper mentions they did not have a specific stock.
You would use some form of RNA as a positive control. Do you know what that is? A control (positive/negative) or quantified (low/medium/high) is a means of testing the validity of the equipment before testing the virus. Whomever wrote this knows nothing about testing.
Doesn't matter what's it's called.
You don't know what "covid" is, any more than you understand PCR tests.
Attempting to denigrate others does not hide the fact that you're relying on presumptions that have led you astray.
If that was true, then it would be an easy task for you to provide all of us readers with proof of where that "stock" is located. Alas, you cannot because there is no such stock to be found anywhere in the world - your protestations to the contrary notwithstanding.
NOT ONE LABORATORY WORLDWIDE has any "stock" of any so-called corona virus:
FOIs reveal [link] that health/science institutions around the world (225 and counting!) have no record [link] of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever.
You can continue to blather on, speculating and prevaricating all you like, but such doesn't change the fact that you (and CDC) have no "covid" virus and no "stock."
"Testing" was never the issue.
Yes, it does. If a person comes to a hospital with flu-like symptoms, it can be tested as flu or COVID. Both tests are done at the same time. Sometimes it is one, sometimes another. You can also test a person for COVID antibodies once they are better.
Really?
You are making false statements. The CDC did not claim COVID did not exist. You are copying misinformation intended for people that do not understand research. in a paper they mentioned that a specific form was not available, not that COVID did not exist. This is normal in research to answer questions about why a preferable form was not used.
First, I do not think you realize how ignorant you are coming off. Isolate = isolated "pure" Quanitified means to know the amount. You do not need a science degree to understand such a simple concept.
Google:
Quantifiable COVID-19 isolates (SARS-CoV-2) are obtained from patient samples (nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, sputum, or stool) and cultured in laboratories to measure viral load, infectivity, and replication kinetics. Research has quantified infectious virus in clinical samples ranging from
5 plaque-forming units/mL (PFU/mL) up to
1.0×1061.0 cross 10 to the sixth power
PFU/mL.
They were using non-isolated COVID that was not quantified. There is COVID in snot, but that is not ideal, thus you want to isolate it. Quantifiable means knowing the "amount." That is all that means.
This was an early paper that mentions that the source of COVID was not pure and not quantified. That is still okay because it is PCR. People do PCR testing from materials not isolated and not quantified found at crime scenes which results in life sentences. However, it would be better not to use a COVID sample from someone's snot in which you did not know the level of COVID. That is less desirable.
Go into a hospital with flu-like symptoms, they will run a respiratory panel. Why do some test positive for COVID? Magic? Then, months later test their antibodies and they go COVID antibodies.
Attachments
Doesn't matter what it's called. Regardless you're regurging the BigPharma party line, you bring nothing but conditioning and opinion.
The "false statements" are the CDC's. It's called 'lying with the truth.' CDC does not have any COVID sample - simple.
Mere paper is paper and words are words. Meanwhile, CDC still has NO sample of any "SARS-CoV-2 virus" - cannot provide any sample - because it does not exist. The burden of proof is on CDC - not on us - to show that it exists. Alas, both CDC and you have failed to meet that burden of proof.
The attachment, like your argument, is A.W.O.L.