You have this backwards. I am not responsible to prove the vaccine is not safe or effective, it is the responsibility of the drug company that manufactures the vaccine to prove to me that it is both safe and effective.
The reason I refused to take the vaccine was not because I had any evidence that it was harmful. The reason was because the mandate was done illegally. In order to mandate an experimental vaccine several requirements must be met:
1. There cannot be an effective therapy. Both HCQ and Ivermectin have been proven to be safe and effective therapies for all viral infections over the last few decades. That is why prior to the mandate they mocked and ridiculed HCQ as "bleach" and Ivermectin as "Horse dewormer". They had to lie to prevent these from being seen as effective therapies, otherwise they could not have mandated the vaccine.
2. When they give you an experimental vaccine they must provide you with all the research that had been done. Instead they gave people blank paper. Why? What were they hiding? I don't know, but that action was illegal.
Then they flipped the script. Instead of the drug company being required to show us the research that the vaccine they had manufactured was safe and effective they required those of us who saw what they were doing was illegal to provide scientific proof that the vaccine was not safe and effective. I have no access to do that research and it is ridiculous to require me to do that. The very fact they asked this was proof to me that something was rotten in Denmark. Your asking this question further supports how pervasive this brain washing and manipulation has been.
For all I know the vaccine mandate might have simply been a way to test how gullible and naive the general population is and how easily they can be manipulated.
Their symbol
Their temples
Their priests