You've never read of regimes toppled and leaders inflicted with hardships.... maybe even killed?
is that mean sun ever come turn to black and moon to blood and big earthquake ever happen in the same time?
You've never read of regimes toppled and leaders inflicted with hardships.... maybe even killed?
amen brother it dont mean that.is that mean sun ever come turn to black and moon to blood and big earthquake ever happen in the same time?
amen brother it dont mean that.
see a thousand books dont do u no good if u cant believe the one book that matters.
the problem i have with all the literary things u mentioned willie is that isnt the bible supposed to be God's breathed? so thats why its safe to say it means what it says and is self-interpreting.
for example all the prophecies about Jesus' first coming were literal.
Good day oyster67,
If you are interested, I have been doing a teaching on Revelation for several months now. To get to all of the blogs on Revelation, at the top of the page just click on "Christian Blogs" and then on "Member blogs". Then over on the left side of the page click on "Ahwatukee" and it will take you to all of the blogs done on Revelation done so far.
Hope to see you out there!
I have been patiently awaiting this! (While trying not to bombard you with too many hints whenever I run into you in here.)
I have wished to see this for so long! It gets too confusing in the format of a thread with all the bickering.
I will be reading it!![]()
Further, the prophets in general use a great deal of hyperbole and picturesque exaggeration in the manner of Oriental poetry. As the days of a tree shall be the days of my people (Isa. 65:22). Yet destroyed I the Amorite whose height was like the height of the cedars (Amos 2:9): statements which mean respectively ‘very old’ and ‘very tall.’ It goes right back to primitive poetry: The mountains skipped like rams... The earth trembled and shook (Ps. 114). Poets, even Western poets, will always continue to use it.
It includes the use of huge figures; a reign of forty years means a good long reign, and a kingdom of a thousand years means a good long kingdom. The poetry of Jesus has it to a superlative degree; camels are swallowed or passed through needles’ eyes; mountains are thrown into the depths of the sea; a man gets a tree-trunk stuck in his eye. People without sufficient imagination to understand this and to enjoy it ought to steer clear of Apocalypse language. Just as a witness has to understand ‘the nature of an oath,’ so a commentator ought to understand the nature of a poem, or even of a joke. Many who are deficient in a sense of poetry and a sense of humor have tried their hands on the Book of Revelation, and made a mess of it.
Concerning the signs of the times, are we supposed to be looking at the sky and the alignment of planets and stars, the sun and the moon?
The sun and moon will not be darkened until after the tribulation is over, immediately before we are caught up into the clouds with Jesus. (Matthew 24:29-31)
Concerning ourselves, shouldn’t we be looking instead at the last church age, of the Laodica, (Revelation 3:14-22) to see if our doctrines aligned with them, or are contrary to them?
Shouldn’t we be looking at the signs Jesus gave in Matthew chapter 24, or are we looking at something different in order to exempt ourselves?
And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world? (Matthew 24:3)
I watched as he opened the sixth seal. There was a great earthquake. The sun turned black like sackcloth made of goat hair, the whole moon turned blood red
seem to me this verse never happen yet.
big earthquake, sin turn to black, moon turn to blood red in the same time, never happen yet
Hi Jackson123,
Try these passages about the day of the Lord. You will see similar language to the passage of Rev 6:12-17.
The events that are described happened long ago to different cities and nations.
Please read the context passage first, and then focus in on the selected verses.
=============
Jer 46:1-12, The day of the lord against Egypt, v 2, 10. Also, Ezek 30:1-5, 3.
Please also note the reference to Egypt being like rising flood waters. Waters are people, Rev 17:15.
--
Isaiah 34:1-10, 6, 8, The day of the Lord against Idumea (Edom).
See especially v 4, "And the host of heaven shall be dissolved, and the heavens shall be rolled together as a scroll: and all their host shall fall down, as the leaf falleth off from the vine, and and as a falling fig from the fig tree."
This already happened years ago, now compare it to Rev 6:13-14.
The Isaiah passage is about Edom, the Rev passage is about 70 AD Jerusalem.
---
Isaiah 13:1-22, 9, The day of the Lord against Babylon. Vs 9-13.
---
Day of the Lord against 70 AD Jerusalem.
Joel 2:1-11, Confirmed by Peter on the day of Pentecost Acts 2:16-21.
------
Also see Mt 24, Mk 13, Lk 21.
So you believe what john saw is what happen in the past, like what happen in agypt in Moses time?
[h=1]Revelation 1King James Version (KJV)[/h]1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
seem to me revelation ion talking about future.
must shortly come to past.
if john accept revelation in the '90 , A D 70 is not in the revelation.
Exactly! He did not write it in the 90s.
And, "Yes", St. John WAS speaking of things that were going to happen in the future........ The NEAR future, as he stated at both the beginning of his letter, and at the end. They were to "happen shortly" (soon). And they did. Actually, within one single generation (about 40 years), and some of those standing there, listening to him, witnessed them.
The Second Coming already happened and we missed it?
So you believe what john saw is what happen in the past, like what happen in agypt in Moses time?
Revelation 1King James Version (KJV)
1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
seem to me revelation ion talking about future.
must shortly come to past.
if john accept revelation in the '90 , A D 70 is not in the revelation.
The Second Coming already happened and we missed it?
Exactly! He did not write it in the 90s.
And, "Yes", St. John WAS speaking of things that were going to happen in the future........ The NEAR future, as he stated at both the beginning of his letter, and at the end. They were to "happen shortly" (soon). And they did. Actually, within one single generation (about 40 years), and some of those standing there, listening to him, witnessed them.
Exactly! He did not write it in the 90s.
And, "Yes", St. John WAS speaking of things that were going to happen in the future........ The NEAR future, as he stated at both the beginning of his letter, and at the end. They were to "happen shortly" (soon). And they did. Actually, within one single generation (about 40 years), and some of those standing there, listening to him, witnessed them.
Rev 1:19, "Write the things which thou hast seen, and things which are, and the things which shall be hereafter;"
John had seen Jesus killed, the resurrection, Pentecost, and Jerusalem destroyed.
So it is possible that he describes the dest of Jeru.
Exactly! He did not write it in the 90s.
And, "Yes", St. John WAS speaking of things that were going to happen in the future........ The NEAR future, as he stated at both the beginning of his letter, and at the end. They were to "happen shortly" (soon). And they did. Actually, within one single generation (about 40 years), and some of those standing there, listening to him, witnessed them.