The Noahide Laws: A Later Tradition or God’s Complete Law?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

2Christ

Well-known member
May 30, 2026
482
318
63
The Seven Noahide Laws are often presented as though God gave Noah a specific list of seven commandments that would be the complete law for all people outside Israel. But that is not what the Bible says.

Genesis records that God made a covenant with Noah and gave commandments to him and his descendants. For example, God prohibited eating flesh with its blood and established the seriousness of murder (Genesis 9:4–6). However, Genesis never gives a numbered list called “the Seven Noahide Laws.”

The seven-law system came much later through rabbinic Jewish tradition. The idea developed in rabbinic writings and was especially set out in the Talmud, particularly Sanhedrin 56a–60a. The Babylonian Talmud reached its final form around the fifth and sixth centuries AD. Thus, the familiar Seven Noahide Laws are a later rabbinic classification, not a list given to Noah in Scripture.

The traditional seven are: no idolatry, no blasphemy, no murder, no sexual immorality, no stealing, no eating flesh taken from a living animal, and the establishment of courts of justice.

These are not bad commandments. Most clearly agree with God's revealed will. The problem comes when they are treated as though they are the complete moral law that God gave to everyone outside Israel.

The rabbis made a distinction between commandments given to Israel through Moses and commandments they considered universally binding on the descendants of Noah. This allowed Gentiles to be considered righteous without becoming Jews or taking upon themselves the whole Mosaic covenant. It also helped preserve the distinction between Israel and the nations, especially as rabbinic Judaism developed after the destruction of the Temple in AD 70.

But we should be careful about saying that the rabbis simply “removed” God's commandments. Their position was more that most of the commandments belonged specifically to Israel, while seven categories applied to humanity generally. The Bible itself, however, never says that the nations are limited to seven commandments.

In fact, Scripture shows that God's moral requirements existed before Moses. Abraham lived before the giving of the Law at Sinai, yet God said of him:

“because Abraham obeyed My voice and kept My charge, My commandments, My statutes, and My laws.” (Genesis 26:5, NKJV)

This shows that God's commandments did not suddenly begin with Moses.

Jesus also never taught His disciples that Gentiles were limited to seven Noahide laws. When a man asked Him about eternal life, Jesus said:

“But if you want to enter into life, keep the commandments.” (Matthew 19:17, NKJV)

He then named several of the Ten Commandments: do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not bear false witness, and honor your father and mother (Matthew 19:18–19).

Jesus did not reduce God's commandments to seven. Instead, He went deeper into them. “You shall not murder” became more than simply avoiding killing someone, because Jesus taught against unjust anger and hatred (Matthew 5:21–22). “You shall not commit adultery” went deeper than the physical act, because Jesus taught that lust begins in the heart (Matthew 5:27–28).

Jesus also strongly warned against replacing God's commandments with human tradition:

“Thus you have made the commandment of God of no effect by your tradition.” (Matthew 15:6, NKJV)

This is important when considering later religious systems. Human traditions must never be placed above what God has commanded.

Jesus also said:

“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.” (Matthew 5:17, NKJV)

And He continued:

“Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:19, NKJV)

The Ten Commandments therefore remain the foundation, while Jesus reveals their deeper meaning and teaches us to obey them from the heart. He did not make God's law smaller. He made its true purpose clearer.

The difference can therefore be stated simply: the Seven Noahide Laws are a later rabbinic classification of what Judaism considers basic universal obligations. They should not be treated as a replacement for God's commandments or as the complete standard given by Jesus to His followers.

The Ten Commandments are the foundation, and Jesus takes us deeper. He teaches us not merely to avoid murder, but to remove hatred from the heart; not merely to avoid adultery, but to keep the heart pure; not merely to avoid stealing or lying, but to live in love, truth, mercy, and righteousness.

Jesus summed up the whole direction of God's commandments:

“You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.” (Matthew 22:37, NKJV)

And:

“You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” (Matthew 22:39, NKJV)

So the issue is not whether the Seven Noahide Laws contain some good commandments. They do. The issue is whether they are the complete law of God for Christians. Jesus never taught that. We should follow Jesus, keep God's commandments, and understand them as He taught them, not replace them with a later human classification.
 
Noahide laws, Smoahide laws.

Everybody goes by the same laws whether Jew or Gentile according to the laws of love, moral laws.

The Jews were told not to eat blood as well as the Gentiles.

The Old Testament was a physical covenant with physical ordinances and physical laws given to Israel.

That was the only blessing at that time which was physical blessings.

But a Gentile could take hold of that covenant to be blessed as well.

Like Ruth who told Naomi your God is my God, and your people is my people, and was included in the bloodline of David and Christ.

God required the Gentiles to obey the moral laws, laws of love, which it was required of Israel also.

Jesus took the physical covenant away nailing it to His cross the physical ordinances.

In the New Testament it is the same laws for Jews and Gentiles.

God is not going to give Gentiles laws to obey that does not apply to the Jews also.

Whatever laws it is required for Gentiles to obey would also be required for Jews to obey.

For apart from the physical covenant given to Israel the laws were the same for both and required.

And a Gentile could take hold of the Jews covenant and be blessed for God did not deny them that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charlesiii
Noahide laws, Smoahide laws.

Everybody goes by the same laws whether Jew or Gentile according to the laws of love, moral laws.

The Jews were told not to eat blood as well as the Gentiles.

The Old Testament was a physical covenant with physical ordinances and physical laws given to Israel.

That was the only blessing at that time which was physical blessings.

But a Gentile could take hold of that covenant to be blessed as well.

Like Ruth who told Naomi your God is my God, and your people is my people, and was included in the bloodline of David and Christ.

God required the Gentiles to obey the moral laws, laws of love, which it was required of Israel also.

Jesus took the physical covenant away nailing it to His cross the physical ordinances.

In the New Testament it is the same laws for Jews and Gentiles.

God is not going to give Gentiles laws to obey that does not apply to the Jews also.

Whatever laws it is required for Gentiles to obey would also be required for Jews to obey.

For apart from the physical covenant given to Israel the laws were the same for both and required.

And a Gentile could take hold of the Jews covenant and be blessed for God did not deny them that.
The basic point that God has one moral standard for both Jew and Gentile is correct. God does not have one standard of right and wrong for Jews and another for Gentiles. But that does not prove that the Seven Noahide Laws are God's complete law for Gentiles, nor does Scripture say that the Old Covenant was simply a “physical covenant” that Jesus removed.

God's commandments existed before Sinai. Abraham lived before Moses, yet God said:

“because Abraham obeyed My voice and kept My charge, My commandments, My statutes, and My laws.” (Genesis 26:5, NKJV)

So God's moral law did not begin as a physical system at Sinai.

The statement about blood is also correct. God told Noah:

“But you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood.” (Genesis 9:4, NKJV)

And this applied to Noah and his descendants. It therefore predates Israel and the Mosaic covenant.

Ruth is also a good example of a Gentile joining herself to Israel. She said:

“Your people shall be my people, and your God, my God.” (Ruth 1:16, NKJV)

But Ruth does not prove that God gave Gentiles only seven laws. Rather, she shows that a Gentile could willingly join herself to God's people.

The bigger problem is the statement that “Jesus took the physical covenant away, nailing it to His cross.” What exactly was nailed to the cross? Scripture says:

“having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross.” (Colossians 2:14, NKJV)

The surrounding context speaks about matters such as “food or drink or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths” (Colossians 2:16). But Jesus Himself said:

“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.” (Matthew 5:17, NKJV)

So we should not take Paul's statement and turn it into the idea that Jesus abolished God's commandments. Jesus immediately said:

“Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:19, NKJV)

And when asked what was necessary to enter life, Jesus said:

“But if you want to enter into life, keep the commandments.” (Matthew 19:17, NKJV)

Jesus then named commandments from the Ten Commandments.

There is also an important difference between the covenant and the commandments contained in it. Israel's covenant at Sinai included many things that were specific to Israel's national life, priesthood, sacrifices, sanctuary, inheritance, and ceremonial regulations. That does not mean the moral commandments themselves were merely physical or were abolished.

Jesus actually deepened God's commandments rather than reducing them. Murder became a matter of the heart, adultery became a matter of the heart, and love of neighbor became a central expression of obedience (Matthew 5:21–28; Matthew 22:37–40).

So I agree with this part of the person's argument:

God's moral standard is not different for Jew and Gentile.

But I would reject this conclusion:

“Therefore the Seven Noahide Laws are the complete laws for Gentiles.”

That does not follow from Scripture.

The better conclusion is:

There is one God, one moral standard, and one righteousness. The Ten Commandments give the foundation of that moral law, and Jesus teaches its deeper meaning, reaching into the heart. The later Seven Noahide Laws should not be treated as a replacement for God's commandments.

Acts 15 should also not be understood as saying that these four requirements were the complete law for Gentile believers. The Gentiles were coming from pagan backgrounds and were ignorant of much of God's law. The apostles therefore gave them several essential things they had to stop doing immediately, especially practices connected with idolatry and sexual immorality. The next verse makes this clear: “For Moses has had throughout many generations those who preach him in every city, being read in the synagogues every Sabbath.” (Acts 15:21, NKJV) In other words, the Gentile believers would continue hearing Moses and learning God's law. The four requirements were a necessary beginning, not a complete list of everything God required them to obey.
 
The Seven Noahide Laws are often presented as though God gave Noah a specific list of seven commandments that would be the complete law for all people outside Israel. But that is not what the Bible says.

Genesis records that God made a covenant with Noah and gave commandments to him and his descendants. For example, God prohibited eating flesh with its blood and established the seriousness of murder (Genesis 9:4–6). However, Genesis never gives a numbered list called “the Seven Noahide Laws.”

The seven-law system came much later through rabbinic Jewish tradition. The idea developed in rabbinic writings and was especially set out in the Talmud, particularly Sanhedrin 56a–60a. The Babylonian Talmud reached its final form around the fifth and sixth centuries AD. Thus, the familiar Seven Noahide Laws are a later rabbinic classification, not a list given to Noah in Scripture.

The traditional seven are: no idolatry, no blasphemy, no murder, no sexual immorality, no stealing, no eating flesh taken from a living animal, and the establishment of courts of justice.

These are not bad commandments. Most clearly agree with God's revealed will. The problem comes when they are treated as though they are the complete moral law that God gave to everyone outside Israel.

The rabbis made a distinction between commandments given to Israel through Moses and commandments they considered universally binding on the descendants of Noah. This allowed Gentiles to be considered righteous without becoming Jews or taking upon themselves the whole Mosaic covenant. It also helped preserve the distinction between Israel and the nations, especially as rabbinic Judaism developed after the destruction of the Temple in AD 70.

But we should be careful about saying that the rabbis simply “removed” God's commandments. Their position was more that most of the commandments belonged specifically to Israel, while seven categories applied to humanity generally. The Bible itself, however, never says that the nations are limited to seven commandments.

In fact, Scripture shows that God's moral requirements existed before Moses. Abraham lived before the giving of the Law at Sinai, yet God said of him:

“because Abraham obeyed My voice and kept My charge, My commandments, My statutes, and My laws.” (Genesis 26:5, NKJV)

This shows that God's commandments did not suddenly begin with Moses.

Jesus also never taught His disciples that Gentiles were limited to seven Noahide laws. When a man asked Him about eternal life, Jesus said:

“But if you want to enter into life, keep the commandments.” (Matthew 19:17, NKJV)

He then named several of the Ten Commandments: do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not bear false witness, and honor your father and mother (Matthew 19:18–19).

Jesus did not reduce God's commandments to seven. Instead, He went deeper into them. “You shall not murder” became more than simply avoiding killing someone, because Jesus taught against unjust anger and hatred (Matthew 5:21–22). “You shall not commit adultery” went deeper than the physical act, because Jesus taught that lust begins in the heart (Matthew 5:27–28).

Jesus also strongly warned against replacing God's commandments with human tradition:

“Thus you have made the commandment of God of no effect by your tradition.” (Matthew 15:6, NKJV)

This is important when considering later religious systems. Human traditions must never be placed above what God has commanded.

Jesus also said:

“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.” (Matthew 5:17, NKJV)

And He continued:

“Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:19, NKJV)

The Ten Commandments therefore remain the foundation, while Jesus reveals their deeper meaning and teaches us to obey them from the heart. He did not make God's law smaller. He made its true purpose clearer.

The difference can therefore be stated simply: the Seven Noahide Laws are a later rabbinic classification of what Judaism considers basic universal obligations. They should not be treated as a replacement for God's commandments or as the complete standard given by Jesus to His followers.

The Ten Commandments are the foundation, and Jesus takes us deeper. He teaches us not merely to avoid murder, but to remove hatred from the heart; not merely to avoid adultery, but to keep the heart pure; not merely to avoid stealing or lying, but to live in love, truth, mercy, and righteousness.

Jesus summed up the whole direction of God's commandments:

“You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.” (Matthew 22:37, NKJV)

And:

“You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” (Matthew 22:39, NKJV)

So the issue is not whether the Seven Noahide Laws contain some good commandments. They do. The issue is whether they are the complete law of God for Christians. Jesus never taught that. We should follow Jesus, keep God's commandments, and understand them as He taught them, not replace them with a later human classification.
Totally agree most of Judaism we have today is all made up by Rabbi's who invent to imply their superiority and status as still being the chosen people - Jews believe that they are infallible even though the contradict each other and the OT.



There is also this lie about oral law / tradition passed down which doesn’t stand up to scrutiny an example being 2 Kings 22 & 23 contradict an oral law or at best that the Oral law was lost by the time of King Josiah who reigned around the 7 century BC (16 King of Judah) and was worshipping Idols until he found Moses book and mended his ways. If an oral law did exist, they would not have been following practices such as idol worshipping.



Unfortunately many Christians have fallen for their lies and believe they are still the chosen and hence support a godless white supremacy nation like Israel. Much of these writing came in response to belittle Jesus
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2Christ
Just remember, believing on the Lord Jesus Christ is idolatry to these people. The noahide courts will not be your friend. They hate the Lord Jesus.

John 16​

2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.
3 And these things will they do unto you, because they have not known the Father, nor me.
4 But these things have I told you, that when the time shall come, ye may remember that I told you of them. And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you.

Mark 13​

5 And Jesus answering them began to say, Take heed lest any man deceive you:
6 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
7 And when ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars, be ye not troubled: for such things must needs be; but the end shall not be yet.
8 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be earthquakes in divers places, and there shall be famines and troubles: these are the beginnings of sorrows.
9 But take heed to yourselves: for they shall deliver you up to councils; and in the synagogues ye shall be beaten: and ye shall be brought before rulers and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them.
10 And the gospel must first be published among all nations.
11 But when they shall lead you, and deliver you up, take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye premeditate: but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that speak ye: for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy Ghost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charlesiii
The Seven Noahide Laws are often presented as though God gave Noah a specific list of seven commandments that would be the complete law for all people outside Israel. But that is not what the Bible says.

Genesis records that God made a covenant with Noah and gave commandments to him and his descendants. For example, God prohibited eating flesh with its blood and established the seriousness of murder (Genesis 9:4–6). However, Genesis never gives a numbered list called “the Seven Noahide Laws.”

The seven-law system came much later through rabbinic Jewish tradition. The idea developed in rabbinic writings and was especially set out in the Talmud, particularly Sanhedrin 56a–60a. The Babylonian Talmud reached its final form around the fifth and sixth centuries AD. Thus, the familiar Seven Noahide Laws are a later rabbinic classification, not a list given to Noah in Scripture.

The traditional seven are: no idolatry, no blasphemy, no murder, no sexual immorality, no stealing, no eating flesh taken from a living animal, and the establishment of courts of justice.

These are not bad commandments. Most clearly agree with God's revealed will. The problem comes when they are treated as though they are the complete moral law that God gave to everyone outside Israel.

The rabbis made a distinction between commandments given to Israel through Moses and commandments they considered universally binding on the descendants of Noah. This allowed Gentiles to be considered righteous without becoming Jews or taking upon themselves the whole Mosaic covenant. It also helped preserve the distinction between Israel and the nations, especially as rabbinic Judaism developed after the destruction of the Temple in AD 70.

But we should be careful about saying that the rabbis simply “removed” God's commandments. Their position was more that most of the commandments belonged specifically to Israel, while seven categories applied to humanity generally. The Bible itself, however, never says that the nations are limited to seven commandments.

In fact, Scripture shows that God's moral requirements existed before Moses. Abraham lived before the giving of the Law at Sinai, yet God said of him:

“because Abraham obeyed My voice and kept My charge, My commandments, My statutes, and My laws.” (Genesis 26:5, NKJV)

This shows that God's commandments did not suddenly begin with Moses.

Jesus also never taught His disciples that Gentiles were limited to seven Noahide laws. When a man asked Him about eternal life, Jesus said:

“But if you want to enter into life, keep the commandments.” (Matthew 19:17, NKJV)

He then named several of the Ten Commandments: do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not bear false witness, and honor your father and mother (Matthew 19:18–19).

Jesus did not reduce God's commandments to seven. Instead, He went deeper into them. “You shall not murder” became more than simply avoiding killing someone, because Jesus taught against unjust anger and hatred (Matthew 5:21–22). “You shall not commit adultery” went deeper than the physical act, because Jesus taught that lust begins in the heart (Matthew 5:27–28).

Jesus also strongly warned against replacing God's commandments with human tradition:

“Thus you have made the commandment of God of no effect by your tradition.” (Matthew 15:6, NKJV)

This is important when considering later religious systems. Human traditions must never be placed above what God has commanded.

Jesus also said:

“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.” (Matthew 5:17, NKJV)

And He continued:

“Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:19, NKJV)

The Ten Commandments therefore remain the foundation, while Jesus reveals their deeper meaning and teaches us to obey them from the heart. He did not make God's law smaller. He made its true purpose clearer.

The difference can therefore be stated simply: the Seven Noahide Laws are a later rabbinic classification of what Judaism considers basic universal obligations. They should not be treated as a replacement for God's commandments or as the complete standard given by Jesus to His followers.

The Ten Commandments are the foundation, and Jesus takes us deeper. He teaches us not merely to avoid murder, but to remove hatred from the heart; not merely to avoid adultery, but to keep the heart pure; not merely to avoid stealing or lying, but to live in love, truth, mercy, and righteousness.

Jesus summed up the whole direction of God's commandments:

“You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.” (Matthew 22:37, NKJV)

And:

“You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” (Matthew 22:39, NKJV)

So the issue is not whether the Seven Noahide Laws contain some good commandments. They do. The issue is whether they are the complete law of God for Christians. Jesus never taught that. We should follow Jesus, keep God's commandments, and understand them as He taught them, not replace them with a later human classification.

Yes, Jesus summarized God's requirement for salvation (GRFS) as reflecting or cooperating with divine love in Matt. 22:37-39.

So the issue is how folks unfamiliar with Jesus and the NT could perceive GRFS, from the time of Adam and Noah through today.

My recent insight is that all truth is one, and each part of truth contains the whole truth in what can be compared to fractal designs.
 
Just remember, believing on the Lord Jesus Christ is idolatry to these people. The noahide courts will not be your friend. They hate the Lord Jesus.
This alone shows you where the "Noahide laws" come from. Just another scam from modern day Judaisers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere