E
I would like to piggyback off this for a second. Id say we need to use scripture eyes to see ones sinfulness but rather than us it to boost our egos and put others down. We should and are supposed to use that in tandem with love to help others and to shape our perceptions to become more biblical AND loving. For example if I compare you to the bible i might see that youre prideful. Now we have two choices 1) We identify with you and politely point it out and encourage to help you grow OR 2) we just say that im better than you and be done. I would argue we NEED scripture eyes but like that john verse we need not judge by appearance but work to help whats underneath for their benefit because tis right
Yes im referring to the scripture eyeswhich post are you talking about? The one I posted about scripture eyes?
I don't blame God on anything and never once suggested it. I consider it a blessing because during that time God allowed me to learn and enjoy some of the tasks I was responsible for. No one person knows who they are in Christ as God should be changing them into whoever God wants them to be. I do know what submission is as I submit myself to God every morning. That is to surrender oneself to another. I am by no means a passive person, I choose whether to respond to something or not. I pray before I make any decision and I do not appreciate being judged on anything I have stated here. I choose to submit to God and allow God to mold me into what he wants and I don't believe that has anything to do with being passive or naive if anything that is true submission.
No one person knows who they are in Christ as God should be changing them into whoever God wants them to be
I pray before I make any decision and I do not appreciate being judged on anything I have stated here
Yes im referring to the scripture eyes
I would like to piggyback off this for a second. Id say we need to use scripture eyes to see ones sinfulness but rather than us it to boost our egos and put others down. We should and are supposed to use that in tandem with love to help others and to shape our perceptions to become more biblical AND loving. For example if I compare you to the bible i might see that youre prideful. Now we have two choices 1) We identify with you and politely point it out and encourage to help you grow OR 2) we just say that im better than you and be done. I would argue we NEED scripture eyes but like that john verse we need not judge by appearance but work to help whats underneath for their benefit because tis right
That is not so and a very dangerous way to believe.
The NT is explicit that we are to be changed into the image of Christ...He is our example...we have a very direct map to follow....the Christian life is not some ever changing and uncertain course with each person believing what and how they want.
Cop out. You do not really want to have a conversation about this which is why you pull out the old red herring someone is judging you.
I am sorry...but you do not understand submission as the Bible delineates it. Submission to everyone indicates passivity which means you are open for deception.
There is no defense of this op or of submission to everyone as you have indicated
IMO, you simply do not understand and I will leave it at that but I do hope and pray you get some clarification because a marriage where the women has no input and just obeys, is no marriage at all and will engender resentment and hostility and the sad thing is, you may very well draw the very man who will treat you that way.
Ok 1) you're being a little harsh. I can understand you saying this to someone with thicker skin but from what I have seen she's not that great with words and she seems a little sensitive (that was just the impression I got) so consider your audience. You can say the same thing in a completely different way.
2) I see what you are saying about submission and I agree with you but like I said, consider your audience. You will be much more effective if you do.
Cmariah,
Submission does not mean you don't get a voice. I think it's admirable that you submit yourself to everyone but don't hurt yourself or think badly of yourself in the process. If you feel called to submit to everyone go for it but please do so in a healthy manner.
Also don't let your future spouse make ALL the decisions by himself. Not only is that not fair to you but that puts a MASSIVE burden on him. If he decides not to take it seriously you could be in real trouble. If he does take it seriously he could easily get worn out from the constant pressure and anxiety. Yes, men have feelings too. They also get anxious. You have a brain so use it. I would suggest reading the book of Esther. She used her brain and was very blessed for it. You can use yours too. Now don't be like "my way or the highway" but you can be like "I'm sorry I don't agree with you. let's work to come to a decision we BOTH agree on." There's a thread in the family forum called "listening time" that I think would do you good.![]()
All your conclusions are false, as is often the case with you. I've never been married. Nobody left. I share relevant statistics, studies, and observations which radical feminism has negatively and materially wrought across Western Civilization since the late 1960s.
For some reason, probably your leftist programming, this causes you to engage in the fallacy of ad hominem. It's unfortunate that drawing false conclusions and projecting fabricated ad hominem at people somehow helps you make sense of the world primarily because it reveals how lost you really are intellectually and in your personal worldview which, of course, makes you a liability toward correcting the serious sweeping problems caused by radical feminism.
Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married
I know two women who . . . are feminist and they're both lesbians.
OK well full maybe a bit exaggerated but thanks for the commentI don't believe I took them out of context. I guess you are the only one with full understanding? Lol
All your conclusions are false, as is often the case with you. I've never been married. Nobody left. I share relevant statistics, studies, and observations which radical feminism has negatively and materially wrought across Western Civilization since the late 1960s.
For some reason, probably your leftist programming, this causes you to engage in the fallacy of ad hominem. It's unfortunate that drawing false conclusions and projecting fabricated ad hominem at people somehow helps you make sense of the world primarily because it reveals how lost you really are intellectually and in your personal worldview which, of course, makes you a liability toward correcting the serious sweeping problems caused by radical feminism.
Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married
I agree.Yes because while you sit around and try to blame men in MY age group not being married on feminism. I can tell you thats actually not the case. We graduate high school, go to college, graduate college, and then after 16-18 years in school not even counting higher education like masters or doctorates, the last thing on our mind is immediately jumping into a marriage which is a lifelong commitment.
Maybe we want to get stable in our careers, clear up college debt, travel, but certainly not get married immediately. Sorry your head is clearly stuck in some 1950's mindset were everyone got married asap. We have girlfriends, they aren't exactly jumping on the baby train either and have the same desires of careers and being debt free and actually enjoying life for a while before settling down.
And on your whole feminist nonsense. I know two women who would actively say they are feminist and they're both lesbians. So for some reason i Don't think these man-hating feminists are a big of an issue as you like to pretend.
Sorry our life choices dont mirror your opinion of what they should be. Perhaps you would be happier living around people like the duggars.
Yes because while you sit around and try to blame men in MY age group not being married on feminism. I can tell you thats actually not the case. We graduate high school, go to college, graduate college, and then after 16-18 years in school not even counting higher education like masters or doctorates, the last thing on our mind is immediately jumping into a marriage which is a lifelong commitment.
Maybe we want to get stable in our careers, clear up college debt, travel, but certainly not get married immediately. Sorry your head is clearly stuck in some 1950's mindset were everyone got married asap. We have girlfriends, they aren't exactly jumping on the baby train either and have the same desires of careers and being debt free and actually enjoying life for a while before settling down.
And on your whole feminist nonsense. I know two women who would actively say they are feminist and they're both lesbians. So for some reason i Don't think these man-hating feminists are a big of an issue as you like to pretend.
Sorry our life choices dont mirror your opinion of what they should be. Perhaps you would be happier lving around people like the duggars.
Because you're so interested in my personal life (only in a bad way for the purpose of ad hominem) Nautilus, I'll give you another tidbit.
Recently, this year, I had to again change churches (from one typical evangelical assembly to another typical evangelical assembly). The reason for this is because yet another woman in her thirties that was one of my plutonic female friends "fell in love" with me.
I explained to her that there was no future for us as a married couple because if I marry her I'll lose the legal power I presently enjoy as a non-married individual and enter into a state in which men have lost virtually all of their legal protections and liable for outright exploitation (even with a prenup in this state).
I explained the nightmare stories of men going to prison after becoming sick and losing their job and the madness and severe persecution that I'd seen friends of mine who were male have to endure for decades after a divorce... how there's no time period or amount of distance, legal contract or legal status, that can truly be said to protect a man after a divorce and that you have literally no angle of protection or legal status to escape it. You can (and many do) lose everything including your children.
I told her I'd die before I'd sign an ungodly legal contract that reduced me to THAT.
She said, "but I LOVE you." I said, love someone else because I'll never marry under the present feminist gulag system. I distanced myself from her immediately but she wouldn't stop. Apparently, she was in love with me. So then people started approaching me about it. I told them look I have a lot of friends. Many of them are women. I am a genuine Christian and these relationships are plutonic. They are NOT sinful. They said she had told them that and they understood that.
I told them if the laws were different, I'd already be married. But the laws are NOT different and I'm not going to violate my liberty and integrity to legally contract myself to a state of powerless human slavery where I can be legally raped by the government forever after she divorces me.
But, I could see it wasn't going to stop, so I left. Now I'm making new friends. Many of them are female. Wash, rinse, repeat. Fortunately there are a lot of churches where I live. A lot of them. So, it's going to be OK.![]()
Women of that age who definitely want biological kids have already had to make that commitment, possibly by marrying someone much older.
So Blain and I were PMing and I asked him how his previous message relates to women. He was able to put in to words what I was thinking but never able to put in to words for so long. Here's the main part of it:
"It relates to women because you have to think of how God sees women not what you think scripture says about them. It's literally all about who's eyes you are looking through."
This is so crucial. Please take a minute and ask yourself, how does God see women? I would like answers here. Honest ones. How God sees women and what we THINK scripture says about them are pretty opposite.
Esther
Deborah
Ruth
Mary (Jesus's mom)
Mary Magdalene
Lydia
Are just a few. How does the Bible portray these women? Not as weak or feeble. There is a point in the book of Esther where she literally says, "If I perish, I perish." That takes strength and guts. Esther was no submissive little house wife. She was strong.
And Ruth she could have gone off to another husband but she stayed with Naomi. How is that weak?
Look at Proverbs 31
Ephesians 5:25 was written during a time when women had less monetary value than a goat. Women should not have monetary value to begin with. If this was written at a time when men didn't HAVE to love their wives why did God put it in there to begin with??
Genesis 1:27 ..in His image He created them male and female... So he also created women in His image.
Galatians 3:28 If we are all really equal in Christ then why don't we act like it? Why stress male headship? Why not stress Christ-like equality?
People tend to look at women as "the second sex" or "the weaker sex". You can deny it all you want but when you quote certain Bible verses you are instilling in young womens minds that they are not capable or competent.
Can we please look at Gods heart on this one?
Because you're so interested in my personal life (only in a bad way for the purpose of ad hominem) Nautilus, I'll give you another tidbit.
Recently, this year, I had to again change churches (from one typical evangelical assembly to another typical evangelical assembly). The reason for this is because yet another woman in her thirties that was one of my plutonic female friends "fell in love" with me.
I explained to her that there was no future for us as a married couple because if I marry her I'll lose the legal power I presently enjoy as a non-married individual and enter into a state in which men have lost virtually all of their legal protections and liable for outright exploitation (even with a prenup in this state).
I explained the nightmare stories of men going to prison after becoming sick and losing their job and the madness and severe persecution that I'd seen friends of mine who were male have to endure for decades after a divorce... how there's no time period or amount of distance, legal contract or legal status, that can truly be said to protect a man after a divorce and that you have literally no angle of protection or legal status to escape it. You can (and many do) lose everything including your children.
I told her I'd die before I'd sign an ungodly legal contract that reduced me to THAT.
She said, "but I LOVE you." I said, love someone else because I'll never marry under the present feminist gulag system. I distanced myself from her immediately but she wouldn't stop. Apparently, she was in love with me. So then people started approaching me about it. I told them look I have a lot of friends. Many of them are women. I am a genuine Christian and these relationships are plutonic. They are NOT sinful. They said she had told them that and they understood that.
I told them if the laws were different, I'd already be married. But the laws are NOT different and I'm not going to violate my liberty and integrity to legally contract myself to a state of powerless human slavery where I can be legally raped by the government forever after she divorces me.
But, I could see it wasn't going to stop, so I left. Now I'm making new friends. Many of them are female. Wash, rinse, repeat. Fortunately there are a lot of churches where I live. A lot of them. So, it's going to be OK.![]()