i think you are underestimating the mood of the previously silent, silent majority.
I think you are, the Hillary supporters don't talk much. The Trump supporters ain't the silent majority, they're the noisy minority and have been the whole race.
i think you are underestimating the mood of the previously silent, silent majority.
I think you are, the Hillary supporters don't talk much. The Trump supporters ain't the silent majority, they're the noisy minority and have been the whole race.
Anyone who thinks Kasich represents the people? Probably believes Bill Clinton is not a dirty old man...
Lol what's that make Trump then considering all the politicians he's bribed, even to empower them democrats and their agendas which he publicly supports? Even Hillary for that matter. Not very long ago either. Ya'll being taken for a ride.
If campaign contributions are bribes as you state then let's look at the core of why trump "bribed" and why soros "bribes". Soros is a self confessed radical leftist ideologue who manipulates currencies and funds radical leftist organizations all for the express purpose of undermining the rule of law. Trump is a businessman who plays the game to get zoning requirements and such things in his favor so he can run a real estate business. By that definition you are Comparing apples and oranges.
I'm not even sure if I support Trump as much as I support the irony of America and Americans in general he has exposed. Lol.
You guys convinced me to vote for Bernie today. He's going to make sure that I get my share of your money. LOL
Lol yea, so Trump bribes and corrupts the government for his own gain, for money. Love of money, what was that the root of again?
It isn't illegal to contribute to politicians. I bet if trump didn't have to he wouldn't....but I bet soros would still fund his leftist organizations and manipulate currencies.
Lol I think Trump almost does it just for fun frankly. Nevertheless if campaign contributions are now not an issue then that same standard be measured to Kasich and all the others, but if it is an issue that same standard be measured against Trump. You can't have it both ways, pick one.
How is pointing out that soros is throwing money at kasich having it both ways and what does that say about Kasich? That's what I'm wondering.
It says the Kasich will do whatever it takes to make America Great Again, and I don't blame him the GOP establishment has been snubbing him the entirety of the campaign. I'd also be curious on more details of this whether Soros is directly funding Kasich or whether he is moreso funding the anti-Trump ads that are running in Ohio.
Also if we apply then this same standard to Trump, then he has bribed most the government to corrupt it. He has donated to Hillary and wanted her to win in 2008. He has donated to John Kerry. What's that say about Trump? It says he'll do whatever it takes to corrupt America to his personal gain.
How is pointing out that soros is throwing money at kasich having it both ways and what does that say about Kasich? That's what I'm wondering.
sounds like you are the one having it both ways. Funny how that works.
Not at all, I'll play it whichever way you want to. If we care about the campaign contributions then we'll stripe up Kasich same as Trump, but in that paradigm Trump gets the bigger striping for he is the one bribing and corrupting, the corruptor is worse than the corrupted. But if we don't care about them then we'll chill, but I ain't gonna play this like Kasich is some sorta fairytale bad guy and like Trump is some sorta faux-savior.
Like I said though, I'd still like some more information on this Soros claim. I mean three sentences on a questionable website is rather dubious.