My post question wasn't to you Rainrider , it was to the ones who say they felt it was about promoting self. Truthfully, I am having a hard time understanding why some seem to be so on the defensive in this thread. I thought you brought up an interesting question about the law, and I don't see where this thread went south, but I don't want to try and figure it out either. Maybe you can make it clear to me.I don't see how I ever promoted self. I did defend myself when needed, and yes that may be seen by some as promotion. Yet I don't se you saying a word about the way others acted. Why is that?
And for any that may be left thinking, what the heck? I went right on and reported my self. So if I am asked to leave this sight, trust me, their will be no hard feelings, I think I learned I will ever get from here anyway. Thanks for all your unwillingness to even try to understand.
sigh
miknik
whatever is telling your spirit I made condescending remarks to you? that is not the Holy Spirit
now I can't say more. I can only say what I know to be true and I never addressed you or you remarks other than in the fashion you addressed me and even then, to let you know you are way off and did not understand what I wrote
now, sadly, I am just going to put you on ignore for awhile because you are simply being a distraction and it seems you need attention that I cannot give to you
so I will not be answering you again in this thread because I have tried several times and you just continue and I don't know why
thank you for understanding and accepting the fact I am done trying to explain things I did not say and things I did not post to someone who is insisting that I actually did that very thing
I have had people in my life before that I have about turned myself inside out to try and get on a level of comprehension with, that precludes personal judgement and to this day have had no success.
you do not seem able to read something without seeing yourself in what is written and assuming people are making snide remarks or whatever.
that, is your problem and it will continue until you ease up and allow for a mature conversation and acknowledge that when someone tries to assure you they are not meaning you, addressing you or picking on you, that they may, actually and probably as a Christian, mean what they say and you should accept it and move on.
I mean what I say
No, I don't mind at all miknik5. The Word was in them before He became flesh I believe. I believe we can say the Spirit of the Word of God who was with God and who was God Jn. 1.. I know Him to be Jesus my Savior!And if you don't mind, whose spirit was in all the prophets pointing to the glories and all the grace and truth found in THE ONE who was to come in THE FATHER's NAME?
Would you say the spirit of Christ/spirit of God are synonymous?No, I don't mind at all. The Word was in them before He became flesh I believe. I believe we can say the Spirit of the Word of God who was with God and who was God Jn. 1
I don't know how to answer this. I can tell you what I think I believe and I am thankful my salvation doesn't depend on understanding this, but my take is. Jesus is all that God is but not all there is to God. In a sense Christ and the Spirit of God are synonymous and yet distinct; IOW, God the father is greater than Jesus as Jesus said, but how? I believe the father was greater than Jesus by position, function and office, but they are very equal in nature, character and essence. I hope this answers your question, but I don't pretend to say I know what makes God tick or that my being a finite creature can explain the infinite. I'd have to say God is past finding out that way, but one day we'll know even as we are known when we see Him face to face.Would you say the spirit of Christ/spirit of God are synonymous?
Okay. But do you agree then with John 5 and the truth that those who have heard HIS VOICE have passed from death to life and by the NEW COVENANT do not need for any man to teach him because they are led by HIS LIFE GIVING / LIFE LEADING SPIRITI don't know how to answer this. I can tell you what I think I believe and I am thankful my salvation doesn't depend on understanding this, but my take is. Jesus is all that God is but not all there is to God. In a sense Christ and the Spirit of God are synonymous and yet distinct; IOW, God the father is greater than Jesus as Jesus said, but how? I believe the father was greater than Jesus by position, function and office, but they are very equal in nature, character and essence. I hope this answers your question, but I don't pretend to say I know what makes God tick or that my being a finite creature can explain the infinite. I'd have to say God is past finding out that way, but one day we'll know even as we are known when we see Him face to face.
Miknik5, how can I not agree with this. You are quoting Scripture, and you have understood it correctly, IMHO. Those that hear God's voice are Christ's sheep (of His fold) and they must also know God to hear His voice. Those that know God are saved and belong to God. I can tell you God knows His own and not everyone on this forum knows Jesus. We are led by the Spirit not by manOkay. But do you agree then with John 5 and the truth that those who have heard HIS VOICE have passed from death to life and by the NEW COVENANT do not need for any man to teach him because they are led by HIS LIFE GIVING / LIFE LEADING SPIRIT
No argument from me!I also believe that it is only through CHRIST that we have access to THE FATHER by ONE SPIRIT and that apart from
CHRIST we really can't do anything
did you give two cents what I said No, you haven't replied to every post in this thread don't expect people to respond to every post you make either. Mr. Action
My post question wasn't to you Rainrider , it was to the ones who say they felt it was about promoting self. Truthfully, I am having a hard time understanding why some seem to be so on the defensive in this thread. I thought you brought up an interesting question about the law, and I don't see where this thread went south, but I don't want to try and figure it out either. Maybe you can make it clear to me.
Do see me cry when a post of mine is not answered?
Okay, well you answered my question. You don't know and that includes me to. I don't know either, but I wouldn't let it bother you that much, because each of us have to give account especially for how we deal with those of the household of faith. Some may be on here just to stir up trouble. We are accountable for our action not theirs; so, hang in there. I have a suggestion; maybe you should choose topics that are a little less controversial, and then work up to the sticky ones. BTW, what do you mean you report yourself? Why would you do that?I don't really know, from what I can make out some one seen the word law and made a hard left when they should have went right. Any one that reads this will soon see that I all but dropped out of it.
No but I did see whinny words about people not mentioning the sister thing.
Okay, well you answered my question. You don't know and that includes me to. I don't know either, but I wouldn't let it bother you that much, because each of us have to give account especially for how we deal with those of the household of faith. Some may be on here just to stir up trouble. We are accountable for our action not theirs; so, hang in there. I have a suggestion; maybe you should choose topics that are a little less controversial, and then work up to the sticky ones. BTW, what do you mean you report yourself? Why would you do that?