It is speaking of the future. A 6th grader could read this and tell that truth. smh
Okay, to the people in Rome 20??, Or maybe 30?? will there even be a Rome then? ..............
It is speaking of the future. A 6th grader could read this and tell that truth. smh
Paul was not writing to some distant audience 2000+ years into the future, so ridiculous, he is telling his audience what will happen to them and what they will see in their very near future.
25 I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in, 26 and in this way[e] all Israel will be saved. As it is written:
When did they see the full number of gentiles come in?
thinking it is happening25 I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in, 26 and in this way[e] all Israel will be saved. As it is written:
When did they see the full number of gentiles come in?
No. 9th of Av would never be after the Equinox. Evening of Aug 2nd.the 9th of Av! Very important date, oct 7 was 9th of Av, wasn't it?
The most important date is the one they infer was when Adam and Eve were expelled from the garden. The thought is that when God said they would live for 120 years that this referred to 120 jubilees. They made a deal with the devil that allowed Satan to indwell man as the flesh, but there is a time limit, just like the jubilee gives a time limit to selling your inheritance. You can't sell it, you can only lease it.
If you don't believe that the full number of Gentiles has come in yet
Doesn't matter if Hagee or Darby or what anyone else said. We're not Catholic we can read and understand the Bible and understand for ourselves. The Bible says God made an everlasting, unconditional covenant with the Jews. If God won't keep His promise to the Jews, He won't keep them to you.
This dual fulfillment, second chance is nonsense. There is One covenant.
Darby and Scofield created this lie that there are still some outstanding land covenant to be fulfilled, what a slap in the face to Christ Jesus who made it clear He came for them and they persecuted Him.
Christ Jesus fulfilled all the promises.
True and could it be that the NT is not defining the seed of Abraham as an ethnic group or geographic location that's occupied?
I am a believer in the promises made in that covenant and the New covenant.
I agree with the first half of your paragraph and really wish preachers who claim to be Bible believers would actually do what you suggest. Instead of carrying on a long standing tradition of following the writings of CI Schofield, etc like the Roman Catholic priests do their Pope's.
That goes for many evangelicals in general, Baptists, Pentecostals and various denominations. I agree that they should read the Book with an open mind to the Holy Spirit's illumination. That is commanded of their pastors and teachers.
I've heard the Abrahamic promise quoted many times and took it as I was taught, that we should bless Israel. Then I read the Bible through a time or two and paid attention to the times the covenants were mentioned. Then questions started being answered. I can't really give credit to anyone but the Holy Spirit.
Like Tucker is now doing is asking questions of Cruze like, how do you define Israel?
Does that seem reasonable?
I don't care what others think about this issue and it doesn't get my back up one way or the other. I've been on the side you speak to and don't find it to be a major doctrine or even an issue of any contention.
However, we aren't a mega church pastor who influences millions or a politician like Ted Cruze or I'd be asking questions and setting them straight on the issue with No hesitation.
Why?
Alliances with wicked Israeli politicians will lead to a curse upon many.
So when was it?
I am a believer in the promises made in that covenant and the New covenant.
I agree with the first half of your paragraph and really wish preachers who claim to be Bible believers would actually do what you suggest. Instead of carrying on a long standing tradition of following the writings of CI Schofield, etc like the Roman Catholic priests do their Pope's.
That goes for many evangelicals in general, Baptists, Pentecostals and various denominations. I agree that they should read the Book with an open mind to the Holy Spirit's illumination. That is commanded of their pastors and teachers.
I've heard the Abrahamic promise quoted many times and took it as I was taught, that we should bless Israel. Then I read the Bible through a time or two and paid attention to the times the covenants were mentioned. Then questions started being answered. I can't really give credit to anyone but the Holy Spirit.
Like Tucker is now doing is asking questions of Cruze like, how do you define Israel?
Does that seem reasonable?
I don't care what others think about this issue and it doesn't get my back up one way or the other. I've been on the side you speak to and don't find it to be a major doctrine or even an issue of any contention.
However, we aren't a mega church pastor who influences millions or a politician like Ted Cruze or I'd be asking questions and setting them straight on the issue with No hesitation.
Why?
Alliances with wicked Israeli politicians will lead to a curse upon many.
Let me get this straight, you are saying that when God makes an eternal covenant He means that it is eternal?We have no beef with each other. I simply believe eternal means what it says, unconditional, irrevocable. I take those to mean what they say. Israel was brutally attacked on Oct 7. When we were attacked on 9/11 no one told us how to handle our business. Israel has a right to a homeland and to live there in peace. It's just that simple for me.