There is no such thing as Sola Scriptura

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
are you even supposed to be talking to us?:




Perhaps one of the most important events in the history of the Roman Catholic Church is the Council of Trent (1545–1563). This gathering sought to counter and respond to the Protestant Reformation. It was at this ecumenical meeting that Rome ultimately anathematized, or condemned, the biblical doctrine of justification:

Canon 9: If anyone says that the sinner is justified by faith alone, meaning that nothing else is required to cooperate in order to obtain the grace of justification, and that it is not in any way necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the action of his own will, let him be anathema.1

Canon 14: If anyone says that man is absolved from his sins and justified because he firmly believes that he is absolved and justified, or that no one is truly justified except him who believes himself justified, and that by this faith alone absolution and justification are effected, let him be anathema.2

Canon 24:
If anyone says that the justice received is not preserved and also not increased before God through good works, but that those works are merely the fruits and signs of justification obtained, but not the cause of its increase, let him be anathema.3

Canon 30: If anyone says that after the reception of the grace of justification the guilt is so remitted and the debt of eternal punishment so blotted out to every repentant sinner, that no debt of temporal punishment remains to be discharged either in this world or in purgatory before the gates of heaven can be opened, let him be anathema.4

Canon 33: If anyone says that the Catholic doctrine of justification as set forth by the holy council in the present decree, derogates in some respect from the glory of God or the merits of our Lord Jesus Christ, and does not rather illustrate the truth of our faith and no less the glory of God and of Christ Jesus, let him be anathema.5

....


The Christian will recognize that these condemnations of justification by grace alone through faith alone in Jesus Christ alone stand in direct contradiction to Scripture and amount to an anathema upon the Gospel itself. Romans 3:20–28, 4:3, 5:1, Galatians 3:1–3, Ephesians 2:8–9 and Colossians 2:13–14 are just a few of the numerous passages that address the various condemnations which Rome set forth at the Council of Trent.

AT A GLANCE

[see side-by-side comparison chart of Roman Catholicism vs Biblical Christianity]

Roman Catholicism | Christian Research Network < click

my personal favorite:rolleyes::

Canon 30: If anyone says that after the reception of the grace of justification the guilt is so remitted and the debt of eternal punishment so blotted out to every repentant sinner, that no debt of temporal punishment remains to be discharged either in this world or in purgatory before the gates of heaven can be opened, let him be anathema.4
Ahhh, another uneducated anti-Catholic who is completely oblivious to what the Church teaches.
Ummm, did you know that the anathemas from Trent ONLY apply to Catholics?? Of course, you didn't because none of you ever seem to do any real research before blathering on endlessly about things you know nothing of.

These anathemas were aimed at the Reformers - most of whom were ex-Catholics spreading new theological and Scripturally-unteneble fairytales such as Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura. These men were part of the Body of Christ.
YOU ain't . . .
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
WOW - just . . . WOW.

Do you mean to tell me that you have been arguing against the Immaculate Conception in post after post - and you don't even know what it means??
You claim that Mary HAS Original Sin otherwise "she wouldn't have had to be saved." This statement is based in an abject ignorance of the Immaculate Conception.

As I pointed out - Mary was saved FROM the stain of Original Sin - not AFTER. She was CONCEIVED immaculately. Indeed, she needed a Savior but that doesn't mean she sinned.

When the Angel visited Mary, he called her "Kecharitomene". It translates as, "completely, perfectly, enduringly endowed with grace." No othe human being in ALL of Scripture is described this way. In fact, Jesus is the ONLY human who is spoken of more highly.

Your claim that Mary was nothing special other than the fact that she was a mere vessel is Biblically preposterous. Call me crazy, but YOU weren't chosen from all of the women in eternity to be the Mother of Jesus, who is GOD.
just look at the contortions from this Catholic apologetics page....all to make the grace/favor/esteem Mary had received about being sinless and perfect - when according to Anstey it's the very same thing that was said to Daniel. highly favored

was Daniel conceived immaculately?
was Daniel without sin?

.....


In other words, the perfect tense in Greek is a past tense with a special meaning: it is used to refer to a past action which has effects felt in the present. So, here's what some modern, English-speaking scholars tell us "Kecharitomene" denotes, based purely on the definition of the word and its grammatical usage:

" 'Highly favoured' (kecharitomene). Perfect passive participle of charitoo and means endowed with grace (charis), enriched with grace as in Ephesians 1:6 . . . The Vulgate gratiae plena [full of grace] "is right, if it means 'full of grace which thou hast received'; wrong, if it means 'full of grace which thou hast to bestow' " (A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament, p. 14)

"It is permissible, on Greek grammatical and linguistic grounds, to paraphrase kecharitomene as completely, perfectly, enduringly endowed with grace." (Blass and DeBrunner, Greek Grammar of the New Testament).

However, Luke 1:28 uses a special conjugated form of "charitoo." It uses "kecharitomene," while Ephesians 1:6 uses "echaritosen," which is a different form of the verb "charitoo." Echaritosen means "he graced" (or bestowed grace). Echaritosen signifies a momentary action, an action brought to pass (Blass and DeBrunner, Greek Grammar of the New Testament, p. 166). Whereas, Kecharitomene, the perfect passive participle, shows a completeness with a permanent result. Kecharitomene denotes continuance of a completed action (H. W. Smyth, Greek Grammar [Harvard Univ Press, 1968], p. 108-109, sec 1852:b; also Blass and DeBrunner, p. 175).

The Meaning of Kecharitomene: Full of Grace (Luke 1:28) PhilVaz Phil Philip Phillip Porvaznik < click

...


The angel Gabriel, who brought these marvelous predictions to Daniel, is the same who announced the approach of the fulfillment of them to Zachariah and to Mary (Luke 1:11–19; 26).

The expression used by Gabriel to Daniel, “thou art greatly beloved”, is the exact equivalent of the word addressed by the same messenger to Mary — “thou art highly favored” (Anstey’s Bible Chronology, p. 276). Mr. Anstey says of this expression: “It is used three times to Daniel, and never to anyone else except Mary; and Gabriel is the only angel employed to make known to men the revelation of the mystery of redemption.”

http://www.preteristarchive.com/Books/pdf/1921_mauro_seventyweeks.pdf < click
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
60
0
Uhhhh, let's start from the beginning.
Open up your bible to Revelation 13:8. What does it say?

"And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain before the foundation of the world".

Christ's sacrifice is an ETERNAL one. God can apply salvation from that sacrifice to ANYBODY He pleases because He is NOT subject to time for He is ETERNAL.

Mary was made sinless ONLY by God's grace. She did not achieve it on her own.
Kecharitomene . . .
So why do you worship her then?
And, uhhhh.......Rev. isn't at the beginning.....uhhhhhh....it's at the end.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Ahhh, another uneducated anti-Catholic who is completely oblivious to what the Church teaches.
Ummm, did you know that the anathemas from Trent ONLY apply to Catholics?? Of course, you didn't because none of you ever seem to do any real research before blathering on endlessly about things you know nothing of.

These anathemas were aimed at the Reformers - most of whom were ex-Catholics spreading new theological and Scripturally-unteneble fairytales such as Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura. These men were part of the Body of Christ.
YOU ain't . . .
okay....we're anathema BECAUSE we don't belong to the the Mother-ship.
no salvation outside the Mother-ship.
anyone inside the Mother-ship who utters anything we utter is anathema.

better?

SPIN IT DUDE! go!

"These anathemas were aimed at the Reformers - most of whom were ex-Catholics spreading new theological and Scripturally-unteneble fairytales such as Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura. These men were part of the Body of Christ. YOU ain't . . ."

i'm a LUTHERAN:)
he was anathema, and me right along with him.

dun that just frost ya?
yawn



GOD BLESS
MARTIN LUTHER





edit - might as well add some drama:rolleyes:
O, Reformation, why are you so annoying to Rome?
LOL
 
Last edited:
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
So why do you worship her then?
And, uhhhh.......Rev. isn't at the beginning.....uhhhhhh....it's at the end.
The Book of Revelation is at the end of the Bible - so this means that it doesn't talk about Eternity??
HUH??


Also, why do you join your fellow anti-Catholics I bearing false witness. Why do you say that we worship Mary?
Do you even know what "worshop" means?
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
okay....we're anathema BECAUSE we don't belong to the the Mother-ship.
no salvation outside the Mother-ship.
anyone inside the Mother-ship who utters anything we utter is anathema.

better?

SPIN IT DUDE! go!

"These anathemas were aimed at the Reformers - most of whom were ex-Catholics spreading new theological and Scripturally-unteneble fairytales such as Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura. These men were part of the Body of Christ. YOU ain't . . ."

i'm a LUTHERAN:)
he was anathema, and me right along with him.

dun that just frost ya?
yawn



GOD BLESS
MARTIN LUTHER


edit - might as well add some drama:rolleyes:
O, Reformation, why are you so annoying to Rome?
LOL
Apparently, you don't know your history - or Church history.
You're outside the Church so the Anathemas don't pertain to you or any of your fellow anti-Cathoics. They only apply to members of the Body of Christ.
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
just look at the contortions from this Catholic apologetics page....all to make the grace/favor/esteem Mary had received about being sinless and perfect - when according to Anstey it's the very same thing that was said to Daniel. highly favored

was Daniel conceived immaculately?
was Daniel without sin?
.....
NO - because Daniel wasn't Kecharitomene.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,783
3,684
113
Ahhh, another uneducated anti-Catholic who is completely oblivious to what the Church teaches.
Ummm, did you know that the anathemas from Trent ONLY apply to Catholics?? Of course, you didn't because none of you ever seem to do any real research before blathering on endlessly about things you know nothing of.

These anathemas were aimed at the Reformers - most of whom were ex-Catholics spreading new theological and Scripturally-unteneble fairytales such as Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura. These men were part of the Body of Christ.
YOU ain't . . .
Those points from Trent start off with ''If anyone...''. Since when does 'anyone' mean only Catholics?
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
60
0
See how you rely on a magic word? - Kecharitomene.
You need to be set free of such utter religious tenants.
You say Mary and Daniel are separated by a word. -
Kecharitomene.
Thus deifying her by your religious vocabulary. Listen....the word is not in the text.
Not in the way you envision it.

 

Katy-follower

Senior Member
Jun 25, 2011
2,719
155
63
It's all very well saying this, but where are the scriptures to prove your claim?

Why is it important that Mary be sinless? God could've breathed Jesus into existence, but instead He chose for Jesus to enter this world as a man through birth. Clearly, God doesn't need a perfect and sinless vessel to give birth to Jesus, because Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit.

Since God chose to use a human vessel, someone had to be picked, whether it be a Mary, Susan or Margaret. I expect Mary was chosen as a Godly woman, the right one to raise Jesus as her own. She gave birth to the humanity side of Jesus. God doesn't have a mother, He is the creator of all things and not created by anyone.

Without scripture how do you discern between truth and error?

Without scripture how do you test to see who the false teachers are? How do you know who is deceiving you and who is not?

Since you believe Mary remained a virgin her entire life, you would be admitting that she sinned, because not consummating her marriage to Joseph would've been a sin.

Edit: scripture says Mary had sons and daughters after Jesus.
ChurchAuthority - you skipped my post. Please can you answer the questions above for me?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
your fellow anti-Catholics I bearing false witness. Why do you say that we worship Mary?
Do you even know what "worshop" means?
i don't know what worshop means.
i did a pottery class last year....(?)

you don't worship Mary?








Our Lady Queen of Angels


Well, the Catholic faith has been around for a long time, and believe it or not, these questions have been asked before, and the Catholics have the answer. It goes like this: there are three categories of respect due in the realm of worship. They go by specific names: Latria, Dulia and Hyperdulia. Latria is worship. It is the worship that is due only to God. This worship consists of offering God our lives, our souls, our minds and our bodies as a living sacrifice (Romans. 12. 1-2) We do this pre-eminently through the sacrifice of the Mass.

Dulia is not worship. It is honor. We honor anyone who is eminent and accomplished. We honor them for their brains, their discipline, their wit, their achievement. We honor our parents and grandparents because we owe them that. We honor our loved ones. Part of this honor is that we ask them for things. We come to them with our needs. We look up to them. We respect them. They are our role models and mentors. We have a relationship to them of subservient honor. They are awesome to us. Dulia is also what we give to the saints and angels. We give them the honor that is due to them. As part of this we have a relationship with them. We ask them for things. This is called “praying to the saints.”

Hyperdulia is the honor we give to the Virgin Mary. We give her the highest honor because she is unique amongst all God’s creation. She is higher than the cherubim and seraphim. She is the only created being who was honored by God so greatly that his son took his flesh from her. She has totally unique place of honor in heaven and therefore also amongst all of God’s people on earth. The honor we give her, therefore, and the dulia we give her is higher than any other being. But it is not latria. We’re clear about that. We do not worship Mary.

The sign of this is that we do not make sacrifice to her. You don’t find any Catholic priest offering a Mass to Mary. No. The sacrifice of the Mass is offered to God the Almighty Father.

This also should be understood clearly: the dulia and hyperdulia which we give to Mary and the saints is ultimately honor given to God. We honor the saints (including the Blessed Mother) not for who they are, but for who God made them to be.

Do Catholics Worship Mary? < click


OH NOW I GET IT (not)
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Uhhhh, let's start from the beginning.
Open up your bible to Revelation 13:8. What does it say?

"And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain before the foundation of the world".

Christ's sacrifice is an ETERNAL one. God can apply salvation from that sacrifice to ANYBODY He pleases because He is NOT subject to time for He is ETERNAL.

Mary was made sinless ONLY by God's grace. She did not achieve it on her own.
Kecharcitomen . . .
i hope angela weighs in on this one:rolleyes:

....

"The Greek for "Full of Grace" (Gratia Plena in the Vulgate) is "kecharitomene" which comes from the verb "to endow." The word kecharitomene is a perfect passive participle. It refers to an event completed in the past, but with continued relevance to the present.

It is only used elsewhere one other time in the New Testament, and in that case it is not a perfect passive participle.

In the greeting from Luke 1:28, the Archangel is giving Mary a new name. She is now "Full of Grace", who was once known as Mary.

Putting all this together the Archangel is saying to the Virgin, "Hail, You who have been completely, perfectly, and enduringly endowed with grace."

This is why the verse is the seed of the Immaculate Conception."

"Irish, Catholic,and Dangerous"

.....

does it say ANYWHERE that grace is SALVATION, or SINLESSNESS?
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
60
0
See Author, I have bothered to take authority over false religion.
Nowhere except in your church and the eastern orthodox pillar of outwardly robed righteousness is Mary deified.
Can't you see she was not God, and therefore not part of the Godhead?

Listen bub, look up 'queen of heaven' and see where it originated from and why it is attached to the virgin Mary.
Nowhere is she part of the Godhead.
Only Ishtar(Easter), and Semiramis is the queen of heaven spoken of,....only in pagan rituals and practices.
Research and you will find the truth of your evident false gospel which includes deifying Mary, and making her (a fully created human), part of the eternal Godhead.
Thus I say you pragmatically practice the pagan rituals of polytheism in your attenuated worship(on this board) of "mother" Mary.
 
Last edited:

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Luke 11
Blessedness

27As he said these things, a woman in the crowd raised her voice and said to him, “Blessed is the womb that bore you, and the breasts at which you nursed!” 28But he said, “Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and keep it!” - ESV

Luke 11
True Blessedness
27 And it came to pass, as he spoke these things, a certain woman from the crowd, lifting up her voice, said to him: Blessed is the womb that bore thee, and the paps that gave thee suck. 28 But he said: Yea rather, blessed are they who hear the word of God, and keep it. - Douay-Rheims Bible

huh?

shouldn't it say something like this:

and it came to pass, as he spoke these things, a certain woman from the crowd, lifting up her voice, said to him: Blessed is the womb that bore thee, and the paps that gave thee suck.
and he said: Yea. even above the cherubim, and seraphim, and Co-Redemptrix for you all.
pray to her, and she'll tell me what you asked for.
but as for the rest of you, blessed are they who hear the word of God, and keep it.
 
Last edited:

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
NO - because Daniel wasn't Kecharitomene.
what'd you snip this part for?

The angel Gabriel, who brought these marvelous predictions to Daniel, is the same who announced the approach of the fulfillment of them to Zachariah and to Mary (Luke 1:11–19; 26).

The expression used by Gabriel to Daniel, “thou art greatly beloved”, is the exact equivalent of the word addressed by the same messenger to Mary — “thou art highly favored”

(Anstey’s Bible Chronology, p. 276). Mr. Anstey says of this expression: “It is used three times to Daniel, and never to anyone else except Mary; and Gabriel is the only angel employed to make known to men the revelation of the mystery of redemption.”

http://www.preteristarchive.com/Books/pdf/1921_mauro_seventyweeks.pdf < click
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
a-a-a-anyways. i don't have any antagonism toward catholics - unless they only sound like Mr. Kecharcitomen Authority guy.

then i remember why i am a member of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod.

k...night...may visions of The Ninety-Five Theses Sugar Plums dance in thy Popish heads.




z-z-z-z-z
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
60
0
Mary was the mother of Jesus.
She was not God, nor was she equally part of God as eternal.
She was a highly favored virgin.
Just as all the spirits that are given (by the creator) the grace to recognize Him are
'highly favored'.
She is not eternal.
She is not God.
She is not the queen of heaven. - There is no queen of heaven, -God made heaven.
She is not deity.
Neither she, nor the pope are deity.
Get out of your false dogma of religious institution. - God is a spirit-(the Spirit), and those that worship Him will worship Him in Spirit and in truth.
Jesus is God made flesh.
Mary was His mother, the carnal part of Him.
She is saved, and esteemed by me and others christians as a great woman of righteousness.
But she is not the queen of heaven, she is not God. There is no real queen of heaven.
Satan is the prince of the power of the air, and he can appear as an angel of light.....so he is the 'queen of heaven'.
Get over your false dogma and get into the Word of God. - For by rightly dividing it you will see the error of the paganistic construct of "Mary, Queen of Heaven" - (Thus she becomes Mother Earth, Mother Nature, Mother Gaia)


 
Last edited:

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,786
2,958
113
Sorry I have not entered in the conversation. I am away from home, and relaxing after my graduation. Feels good to be done, but also exciting to be serving God in new ways.

I confess I am puzzled in more ways than one about this whole thread. I like Catholics, and I know many. Most of my Catholic friends have a great love for God and Mary does not enter the picture in their theology. They know Jesus as Lord and Saviour, and they recognize all believers, as those who "Love God, and their neighbor as themselves." (Paraphrase: Luke 10:27). None of them believe that the Catholic Church is the only way to salvation, and I lead Bible studies in long term care, and they all recognize that the way to salvation is through the grace of God.

As for Kecharitomene, it is a hapax legomena. that means it is only found one place in the Bible. Looking at the word closely, and in Exegetical commentaries, the word is a derivative of χάρις or charis. That means grace, favor or kindness. And I am sure that God picked the right woman to bear his Son, and she was Mary. But no where do I see in the Bible, or that word specifically a doctrine of Mary being immaculately conceived.

I also must also pound in the fact, that you NEVER make a doctrine out of just one word, one passage, that is not confirmed in many other places. ESPECIALLY a hapax legomena!! It means you have to go to non- biblical sources to compare usage, and you might get a huge range of meanings, resulting in cherry picking doctrines, like Mary was immaculately conceived.

So bad hermeneutics all the way around!!

On the other hand, that is EXACTLY what this whole post is basically about! Because this doctrine of Mary cannot be seen anywhere in the Bible, so therefore, the Bible is not adequate to explain the truth. So you need some popes making declarations, ex cathedra that Mary was not only immaculately conceived but assumed into heaven.

But even if we create a straw man (or straw Mary!) just to discuss this topic and pretend the Catholic Church is right about Mary, it all comes back to the fact, that Catholic DO pray to Mary, and how is one person (not God!!) supposed to answer to the prayers of millions of Catholic all around the globe, praying the rosary???? Even, as you say, Mary is not God, and only God is worshiped. So how does a mere person, not God hear all those prayers? That in itself is a major stumbling block to this whole Mariology nonsense.

Once again I really think we need to get off the side topic of Mary, and address the real issue with the Catholic church and that is soteriology. How are we saved?

According to the Catholic Church, the monolith of the RCC is what saves, esp the mass, in which a little piece of bread, and a bit of wine turns literally into Jesus, and that is what saved. Jesus work on the cross and believing in that does not save, but rather transubstantiation is the means to salvation.

Transubstantiation is an 18-letter word that is a complete theological statement. . . and the name of a doctrine, out of which springs the most astounding set of beliefs and practices that has ever been taught in the name of religion. Very, very few people know what the Catholic Church actually believes and teaches concerning this subject. and I am convinced that even fewer Catholics realize themselves what they are taking part in. Literally, what "transubstantiation" means the Roman Catholic Church teaches their flocks that the bread and the wine used in the Mass actually, physically, turn into the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ after the priest blesses it during the liturgy (ceremony).

"Jesus Christ does not cease to exist under the appearances of bread and wine after the Mass is over. Furthermore. some hosts are usually kept in all Catholic churches. In these hosts, Jesus is physically and truly present, as long as the appearances of bread remain. Catholics therefore have the praiseworthy practice of 'making visits' to our Lord present in their churches to offer Him their thanks, their adoration, to ask for help and forgiveness; in a word, to make Him the center around which they live their daily lives." ("The Spirit of Jesus" Catholic Home Study Instruction Course, Book #3, p. 92.) That is an incredible interpretation of how to make Jesus the center of your daily life!

Then there is confession to a priest. The priesthood died out with the death and resurrection of Christ and the Bible says we are all a Royal Priesthood.

"But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light." 1 Peter 2:9

In fact, the only other references in the entire Bible to "priest" is the Jewish priest, and then a large section in Hebrews on Jesus being the high priest, which is very instructive.

"For it was indeed fitting that we should have such a high priest, holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens. [SUP]27 [/SUP]He has no need, like those high priests, to offer sacrifices daily, first for his own sins and then for those of the people, since he did this once for all when he offered up himself.[SUP]28 [/SUP]For the law appoints men in their weakness as high priests, but the word of the oath, which came later than the law, appoints a Son who has been made perfect forever." Hebrews 7:26-28

We ARE the priests!

"Worthy are you to take the scrolland to open its seals,
for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God
from every tribe and language and people and nation,
[SUP]10 [/SUP]and you have made them a kingdom and priests to our God,
and they shall reign on the earth.” Rev. 5:9-10



Who can forgive sins, according to the Bible?

"And when Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, “Son, your sins are forgiven.” [SUP]6 [/SUP]Now some of the scribes were sitting there, questioning in their hearts, [SUP]7 [/SUP]“Why does this man speak like that? He is blaspheming! Who can forgive sins but God alone?” Mark 2:5-7

Yet the Catholic church believes that somehow a priest can forgive sins.

"The priest forgives the guilt of mortal sins which saves the penitent from going to hell, but he cannot remit the penalty due for those sins, and so the penitent must atone for them by performance of good works which he prescribes. The penitent may be, and usually is, interrogated by the priest so that he or she may make a full and proper confession. Stress is placed on the fact that any sin not confessed is not forgiven, any mortal sin not confessed in detail is not forgiven, and that the omission of even one sin (mortal) may invalidate the whole confession. Every loyal Roman Catholic is required under pain of mortal sin to go to confession at least once a year. But even after a penitent has received pardon, a large, but unknown amount of punishment remains to be suffered in purgatory." (The doctrine of purgatory rests on the assumption that while God forgives sin, His justice nevertheless demands that the sinner must suffer the full punishment due to him for his sin before he will be allowed to enter heaven.)

I don't know, this sounds like a doctrine straight from the pit of hell. It means a man (the priest!) is the only one who can forgive our sins - not Jesus, not Mary, not a saint - but a man with a collar and title. And yet, the poor person will still need punishment, even though Christ took our punishment on himself. And don't go saying the priest stands in the place of Jesus. Unless you can find a verse somewhere in those 860 references to the word "priest" in the Bible, that says "the Catholic priest takes the place of Jesus in forgiving sins" I am not going to believe this dogma for a second!

"Surely he has borne our griefs
and carried our sorrows;
yet we esteemed him stricken,
smitten by God, and afflicted.
[SUP]5 [/SUP]But he was pierced for our transgressions;
he was crushed for our iniquities;
upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace,
and with his wounds we are healed." Isa. 53:4-5

"For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit," 1 Peter 3:18.


Just give me the verse that states we have to go to purgatory, because Christ's sacrifice wasn't enough. God's justice was satisfied at the cross and no amount of our works or punishment is ever going to breach the separation we have created by our sin to satisfy God. NONE!! And while we are at it, give me a verse that says ONLY a priest can forgive sins, when the Bible is full of verses that Jesus forgives sin, and in fact his very name is from Yeshua in the Hebrew, which means salvation or deliverance.

"The Council of Trent, in its opposition to the reformer's doctrine of justification by faith, and in defense of its doctrine of penance, declared: "Whosoever shall affirm that men are justified solely by the imputation of the righteousness of Christ... let him be accursed" (Council of Trent, section 6.) And the Catholic Almanac says, "Penance is necessary for salvation...and was instituted by Christ for the forgiveness of sins". (pps. 269, 559.)

No wonder the OP started this post. The whole Catholic church falls into ruins if you rely only on the Word of God. You must have all these councils, declarations etc, etc, which add greatly to the rules by which a person can be saved, and take away from the finished work of Christ on the cross.

But again, that is why this is the topic of this thread, because if you believe the Bible, you cannot believe the doctrine of salvation according to the RCC church. The Catholic doctrine of salvation is based on priests, masses and confessions, and that is simply not in the Bible!

"But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it— [SUP]22 [/SUP]the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: [SUP]23 [/SUP]for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, [SUP]24 [/SUP]and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, [SUP]25 [/SUP]whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. [SUP]26 [/SUP]It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus." Romans 3:21-26

Nothing about needing Mary, a priest, or suffering punishment in that passage!! Just believing in Christ!

It is obvious by even a brief glimpse into the doctrines of mortal and venial sins, confession, penance, and purgatory, that the Roman Catholic Church has constructed one of the most unbiblical doctrinal systems that has ever been considered "Christian". The fear, anguish, and religious bondage that such a system of "reward and punishment" creates, has tormented millions of lives for centuries, and continues to prey on those who are ignorant of the biblical way of salvation.
To merely call such a system "a cult", would be to throw it into the vast category of religions and quasi-religions that are currently making the rounds of our college campuses and city streets, snatching up many-an-unsuspecting youth. No, the Roman Church is not a cult. It's an empire! With its own ruler, its own laws, and its own subjects! The empire has no borders, it encompasses the globe with its eye on every person who does not vow allegiance. It calls the members of other faiths "separated brethren" (The term used by Vatican II to describe the members of Eastern Orthodox, Anglican, and Protestant churches.) and has as its goal the eventual bringing together of everyone under its flag.

So the OP's point is that you need MORE than the Bible to be saved. I get that. What I just don't see anywhere in that massive, monetarily rich hierarchy is anything that remotely builds on the truth of salvation by the grace of God in their heretical system. And if you want to yell at me about being "anti-Catholic" remember, I did not start this thread, but a Catholic trying to convince us that this wicked and evil church is the only way to salvation.

"B
ecause, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. [SUP]10 [/SUP]For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved." Romans 10:9-10

Sorry for the LONG post! I just had to make up some ground I lost being mostly off line!
 
Last edited:
A

Abiding

Guest
Angela, just wanted to say that your posts are easy to read. Clear. Loving, informative, and appropriate.
It wouldnt hurt if they were longer, because you have a good writing style.:cool:
Im not saying there too short, just dont ever worry about them being too long:eek:
 
Last edited:

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,783
3,684
113
i don't know what worshop means.
i did a pottery class last year....(?)

you don't worship Mary?








Our Lady Queen of Angels


Well, the Catholic faith has been around for a long time, and believe it or not, these questions have been asked before, and the Catholics have the answer. It goes like this: there are three categories of respect due in the realm of worship. They go by specific names: Latria, Dulia and Hyperdulia. Latria is worship. It is the worship that is due only to God. This worship consists of offering God our lives, our souls, our minds and our bodies as a living sacrifice (Romans. 12. 1-2) We do this pre-eminently through the sacrifice of the Mass.

Dulia is not worship. It is honor. We honor anyone who is eminent and accomplished. We honor them for their brains, their discipline, their wit, their achievement. We honor our parents and grandparents because we owe them that. We honor our loved ones. Part of this honor is that we ask them for things. We come to them with our needs. We look up to them. We respect them. They are our role models and mentors. We have a relationship to them of subservient honor. They are awesome to us. Dulia is also what we give to the saints and angels. We give them the honor that is due to them. As part of this we have a relationship with them. We ask them for things. This is called “praying to the saints.”

Hyperdulia is the honor we give to the Virgin Mary. We give her the highest honor because she is unique amongst all God’s creation. She is higher than the cherubim and seraphim. She is the only created being who was honored by God so greatly that his son took his flesh from her. She has totally unique place of honor in heaven and therefore also amongst all of God’s people on earth. The honor we give her, therefore, and the dulia we give her is higher than any other being. But it is not latria. We’re clear about that. We do not worship Mary.

The sign of this is that we do not make sacrifice to her. You don’t find any Catholic priest offering a Mass to Mary. No. The sacrifice of the Mass is offered to God the Almighty Father.

This also should be understood clearly: the dulia and hyperdulia which we give to Mary and the saints is ultimately honor given to God. We honor the saints (including the Blessed Mother) not for who they are, but for who God made them to be.

Do Catholics Worship Mary? < click


OH NOW I GET IT (not)
so let me get this straight. First there is Mary, then the Cheribim and Seraphim and finally us Plebs.

Maybe we should have the Cheribim and Seraphim to intercede for us to reach Mary! I'm getting dizzy.