Tongues

[Grace777x70]

Scripture also says that the Holy Spirit does not operate outside of Gods word. Unless you can demonstrate that what you are doing is consistent with Gods word you are in dangerous territory.

For the cause of Christ
Roger

This is the last time I am posting these scriptures as it is in a merry-go-round..if you don't want to believe..that's ok...but 100's of millions do...the Holy Spirit will not force you to receive a gift from your Father and Lord.


1 Corinthians 14:2 (NASB)
[SUP]2 [/SUP] For one who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God; for no one understands, but in his spirit he speaks mysteries.

1 Corinthians 14:5 (NASB)
[SUP]5 [/SUP] Now I wish that you all spoke in tongues, but even more that you would prophesy; and greater is one who prophesies than one who speaks in tongues, unless he interprets, so that the church may receive edifying.

1 Corinthians 14:15 (NASB)
[SUP]15 [/SUP] What is the outcome then? I will pray with the spirit and I will pray with the mind also; I will sing with the spirit and I will sing with the mind also.

1 Corinthians 13:1 (KJV)
[SUP]1 [/SUP] Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

Mark 16:17 (NASB)
[SUP]17 [/SUP] "These signs will accompany those who have believed: in My name they will cast out demons, they will speak with new tongues;

 

[notuptome]

This is the last time I am posting these scriptures as it is in a merry-go-round..if you don't want to believe..that's ok...but 100's of millions do...the Holy Spirit will not force you to receive a gift from your Father and Lord.


1 Corinthians 14:2 (NASB)
[SUP]2 [/SUP] For one who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God; for no one understands, but in his spirit he speaks mysteries.

1 Corinthians 14:5 (NASB)
[SUP]5 [/SUP] Now I wish that you all spoke in tongues, but even more that you would prophesy; and greater is one who prophesies than one who speaks in tongues, unless he interprets, so that the church may receive edifying.

1 Corinthians 14:15 (NASB)
[SUP]15 [/SUP] What is the outcome then? I will pray with the spirit and I will pray with the mind also; I will sing with the spirit and I will sing with the mind also.

1 Corinthians 13:1 (KJV)
[SUP]1 [/SUP] Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

Mark 16:17 (NASB)
[SUP]17 [/SUP] "These signs will accompany those who have believed: in My name they will cast out demons, they will speak with new tongues;

You cannot associate those scriptures to what is going on in the modern church. Your application is completely wrong and based on wishful thinking and fails to demonstrate proper biblical exegesis.

1 Cor 13:8 ¶ Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

In any case you will not address the question of whether tongues are human languages or ecstatic utterances.

Mark 16:17 does not support what you contend as your premise for speaking in tongues.

Why belabor the point you take verses out of context to build a pretext for false doctrine.

For the cause of Christ
Roger

 

[notuptome]

One only needs to read the posts to see that ample scripture has been given. Yet you seem to be locked up in that doctrinal plastic bubble where you can't get out & find truth.

Let the Lord judge between me & you. I trust Him with my life.

As for the readers, I invite you to check the majority of websites for & against tongues. Here's what you'll find:
1. Some Pentecostal/charismatic fanatics trying to stretch the truth of scripture to include that they can take authority over any spiritual circumstance at any time at will. This is heresy, for a true believer follows the leading of the Spirit, while these try to invoke God's power as it the Spirit obeys them.
2. Good sites where scripture abounds to prove the existence of the Gifts of the Spirit including tongues.
3. Sites against all Gifts of the Spirit with the exception of discernment, of which most of them will claim to have. Notice when they use scripture in their explanations, it seems quite confusing, as the plain reading of them doesn't match their doctrine rarely at all.

Lastly, they declare that the gifts ended with the Apostles by using religious history as their defense. But note that the majority of that history resides during the dark ages of the RCC. Do you want to believe Catholic history on ANY subject?

My single defense is this..... Outta all the scriptures that name & teach these gifts, there's NO SCRIPTURE to indicate the gifts ever ceased. 1Cor 13:10 is totally taken out of context to teach the 'completion of canon' doctrine, which is easily proven with a commentary to be heresy.

But don't believe me..... check it out for yourself. You need to discover the truth for yourselves. Seek, and ye shall find.

Ah my fine friend one needs only look at the product of this extra biblical thinking to see that it is not scriptural.

In your branch of this doctrine do you speak in human languages or in ecstatic utterances?

How do you defend those who speak in the other venues?

Scriptures teach that tongues are a sign for Israel and a sign of judgment from God.

For the cause of Christ
Roger

 

[Gr8grace]

Ah my fine friend one needs only look at the product of this extra biblical thinking to see that it is not scriptural.

In your branch of this doctrine do you speak in human languages or in ecstatic utterances?

How do you defend those who speak in the other venues?

Scriptures teach that tongues are a sign for Israel and a sign of judgment from God.

For the cause of Christ
Roger

Isaiah 28:11~~New American Standard Bible
Indeed, He will speak to this people Through stammering lips and a foreign tongue,

1 Cor 14:21~~King James Bible
In the law it is written, With men of other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this people; and yet for all that will they not hear me, saith the Lord.

Isaiah 28~~14Therefore, hear the word of the LORD, O scoffers,
Who rule this people who are in Jerusalem,

 

[Grace777x70]

You cannot associate those scriptures to what is going on in the modern church. Your application is completely wrong and based on wishful thinking and fails to demonstrate proper biblical exegesis.

1 Cor 13:8 ¶ Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

In any case you will not address the question of whether tongues are human languages or ecstatic utterances.

Mark 16:17 does not support what you contend as your premise for speaking in tongues.

Why belabor the point you take verses out of context to build a pretext for false doctrine.

For the cause of Christ
Roger

okie dokie........God bless you!.....He won't force anything on you...all is well...

 

[notuptome]

okie dokie........God bless you!.....He won't force anything on you...all is well...

Why will you not address the question of what constitutes tongues in the modern church?

It would be nice for those of us whom you consider naturally minded to know what we should be looking for.

Pr 17:10 A reproof entereth more into a wise man than an hundred stripes into a fool.

For the cause of Christ
Roger

 

[hornetguy]

I thought it was pretty obvious that SOME people in the 1st cent church were speaking in tongues, because Paul addressed the issue.. scriptures have been posted time and again.

It is also fairly apparent that they are "angelic" tongues, or something other than a "human" language, because Paul told the church members to basically "keep it to themselves", unless someone could truly interpret what was being said... otherwise, the tongues were ONLY for the edification of the one speaking...

This was well after Pentecost, when Peter and the apostles were speaking in human tongues, that they previously had not learned... the Word goes into detail about how far and wide the people in Jerusalem had come from, and each of them understood the apostles in their own language.

So, to me, that's two different types of speaking in tongues... do people today receive the gift of angelic tongues? I tend to think yes, probably. Does everyone that has the Spirit "get" them? No. Should we "try" to get them? No. If the Spirit determines you need that gift, you will get it.

I would never tell someone that believes they speak in tongues that they were wrong, but the times I've seen someone purport to speak, on TV, it was pretty ludicrous. Perhaps I just don't "get it"... but for anyone that is NOT a televangelist, that believes they have that gift, God bless 'em. I won't say they don't...... how could I possibly know? That's between them and God.

 

[jaybird88]

why are the only tongues today the heavenly language type? for every heavenly language tongue you would think there would be five or more foreign language type tongues. why do we not see Christians spontaneously speaking Italian, Chinese, Spanish, etc etc.

 

[notuptome]

I thought it was pretty obvious that SOME people in the 1st cent church were speaking in tongues, because Paul addressed the issue.. scriptures have been posted time and again.

It is also fairly apparent that they are "angelic" tongues, or something other than a "human" language, because Paul told the church members to basically "keep it to themselves", unless someone could truly interpret what was being said... otherwise, the tongues were ONLY for the edification of the one speaking...

This was well after Pentecost, when Peter and the apostles were speaking in human tongues, that they previously had not learned... the Word goes into detail about how far and wide the people in Jerusalem had come from, and each of them understood the apostles in their own language.

So, to me, that's two different types of speaking in tongues... do people today receive the gift of angelic tongues? I tend to think yes, probably. Does everyone that has the Spirit "get" them? No. Should we "try" to get them? No. If the Spirit determines you need that gift, you will get it.

I would never tell someone that believes they speak in tongues that they were wrong, but the times I've seen someone purport to speak, on TV, it was pretty ludicrous. Perhaps I just don't "get it"... but for anyone that is NOT a televangelist, that believes they have that gift, God bless 'em. I won't say they don't...... how could I possibly know? That's between them and God.

See this is a perfect example of how error creeps into the church. Paul never said he spoke in angelic tongues. He said even if he did and did not have live he would be lesser for the experience.

1Co 13:1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

Read out of the scripture don't read into it.

For the cause of Christ
Roger

 

[Gr8grace]

I thought it was pretty obvious that SOME people in the 1st cent church were speaking in tongues, because Paul addressed the issue.. scriptures have been posted time and again.

It is also fairly apparent that they are "angelic" tongues, or something other than a "human" language, because Paul told the church members to basically "keep it to themselves", unless someone could truly interpret what was being said... otherwise, the tongues were ONLY for the edification of the one speaking...

This was well after Pentecost, when Peter and the apostles were speaking in human tongues, that they previously had not learned... the Word goes into detail about how far and wide the people in Jerusalem had come from, and each of them understood the apostles in their own language.

So, to me, that's two different types of speaking in tongues... do people today receive the gift of angelic tongues? I tend to think yes, probably. Does everyone that has the Spirit "get" them? No. Should we "try" to get them? No. If the Spirit determines you need that gift, you will get it.

I would never tell someone that believes they speak in tongues that they were wrong, but the times I've seen someone purport to speak, on TV, it was pretty ludicrous. Perhaps I just don't "get it"... but for anyone that is NOT a televangelist, that believes they have that gift, God bless 'em. I won't say they don't...... how could I possibly know? That's between them and God.

From my studies and my conclusion..... when Paul was writing Corinthians there were still 15 or so years before Jerusalem fell. And tongues were a sign to "this people", the Jews that their judgement was coming.

I think tongues ceased in 70 AD when Jerusalem fell.

It was a sign to "this people", the Jews, that their judgement was coming soon. Yet they still didn't listen.

The Angelic languages? The Corinthian believers were acting way out of order and were putting tongues above all else. Some,IMO, were doing it with out interpreters and calling it the language of angels.

so there was a bit of sarcasm when Paul said," If I speak in the language of men or angels...." Paul knew full well that there was no such thing as the language of angels, angels always speak in a language known to man.......they are messengers, not confusers.

 

[peacefulbeliever]

you would think natural sounds of this world would not be needed in a spiritual realm. our spirit connect us to the Lord, not the sounds we make. Jesus taught the importance of silence in prayer, you wouldnt think sounds from this would would be needed for prayer.

Our spirit does connect us to the Lord . . . God is Spirit and He communicates with our Spirit. I don't know if Jesus taught that ALL prayer should be in silence - if he did I don't recall.

tongues was ment to be a tool they could use to spread the gospel, as a language you didnt speak before makes sense, that would be a sign just like the bible teaches. a heavenly language would make no sense to a non believer and would serve no purpose.as a heavenly language when heard, most dont believe (opposite of what bible teaches), many feel an urge to run the other way, that doesnt sound like "seek and you will find"
when heard it sounds like babbling, Jesus taught specifically on this:

Mat 6 7
And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words.

Strong's Concordance battalogeó: to stammer
Short Definition: I chatter, utter empty words. Definition: I chatter, am long-winded, utter empty words, stammer, repeat.

But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do; for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking. . . . I see this verse as fitting the Catholic doctrine with their "Hail Marys" and saying 12 Hail Marys for some type of offense they have done.

tongues was ment to be a tool they could use to spread the gospel - Where is the scripture to back that up? How can tongues be meant for a language to spread the gospel when the person speaking in a tongue doesn't understand or know what language he is speaking - How would he know what to say?

BTW. . . when someone comes to me and starts speaking Spanish . . . it sounds like gibberish/babbling to me because I do not know Spanish but to someone who knows Spanish it doesn't sound like gibberish/babbling. The same could be said of me speaking in English to someone who speaks only Spanish - it sounds like gibberish.

Tongues are a sign for the unbeliever, Prophesy for the believer . . . but if the whole church comes together and ALL speak in tongues - then the unbeliever/unlearned would think they are mad (cra cra!) (14:22,23) that is why Paul goes on to explain how tongues should be done in the church. (14:27,28) The same - if all prophesy (if one speaks in a tongue and interprets) and there comes in one that believes not or is unlearned he will report that God is in you of a truth.

I think that all this being against tongues is because a lot are unlearned in the subject . . . what they have seen in most churches scare them and they want no part of it. I was also like that and I WANTED to speak in tongues but all the other stuff - the laughing, the barking, the running up and down the aisles of the church - I wanted NO part of because I thought it was not of God and still believe that it's not of God . . . the tongues are from God but not the actions that are portrayed.

 

[hornetguy]

1 Corinthians 14:18-19 NLT
I thank God that I speak in tongues more than any of you. [19] But in a church meeting I would rather speak five understandable words to help others than ten thousand words in an unknown language.

So please explain how this is error creeping into the church.... if a language is "unknown" that usually means nobody understands it. What is that, if not angelic tongues?
You can choose to "understand" it however fits your preconceived notions, but it says what it says.

 

[Gr8grace]

1 Corinthians 14:18-19 NLT
I thank God that I speak in tongues more than any of you. [19] But in a church meeting I would rather speak five understandable words to help others than ten thousand words in an unknown language.

So please explain how this is error creeping into the church.... if a language is "unknown" that usually means nobody understands it. What is that, if not angelic tongues?
You can choose to "understand" it however fits your preconceived notions, but it says what it says.

I don't see "unknown" in the most reliable manuscripts. Tongues~~A foreign language. unknown to the speaker.....wouldn't be a gift if the speaker knew it.......but known to the hearers who spoke that foreign language.

[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE="class: maintext, width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: top, width: 17%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]Strong's[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 20%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]Transliteration[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 21%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]Greek[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 21%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]English[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 21%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]Morphology[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]235 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]alla[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἀλλὰ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]but[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Conj[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1722 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]en[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἐν[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]in[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Prep[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1577 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]ekklēsia[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἐκκλησίᾳ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"][the] church,[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]N-DFS[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2309 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]thelō[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]θέλω[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]I desire[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]V-PIA-1S[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]4002 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]pente[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]πέντε[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]five[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Adj-AMP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3056 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]logous[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]λόγους[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]words[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]N-AMP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3588 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]tō[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]τῷ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]with[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Art-DMS[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3563 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]noi[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]νοΐ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]mind[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]N-DMS[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1473 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]mou[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]μου[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]of me[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]PPro-G1S[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2980 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]lalēsai[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]λαλῆσαι,[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]to speak,[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]V-ANA[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2443 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]hina[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἵνα[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]that[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Conj[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2532 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]kai[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]καὶ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]also[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Conj[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]243 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]allous[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἄλλους[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]others[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Adj-AMP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2727 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]katēchēsō[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]κατηχήσω,[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]I might instruct,[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]V-ASA-1S[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2228 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]ē[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἢ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]rather than[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Conj[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3463 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]myrious[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]μυρίους[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]ten thousand[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Adj-AMP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3056 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]logous[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]λόγους[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]words[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]N-AMP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1722 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]en[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἐν[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]in[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Prep[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1100 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]glōssē[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]γλώσσῃ.[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]a tongue.[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]N-DFS[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

 

[hornetguy]

[SUP]39 [/SUP]So, my dear brothers and sisters, be eager to prophesy, and don’t forbid speaking in tongues. [SUP]40 [/SUP]But be sure that everything is done properly and in order.

Straight from Paul. His final thoughts on that whole part of his letter to Corinth.

 

[hornetguy]

[SUP]13 [/SUP]Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may interpret.
[SUP]14 [/SUP]For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.
[SUP]15 [/SUP]What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also.
[SUP]16 [/SUP]Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest?
[SUP]17 [/SUP]For thou verily givest thanks well, but the other is not edified.
[SUP]18 [/SUP]I thank my God, I speak with tongues more than ye all:
[SUP]19 [/SUP]Yet in the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that by my voice I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an unknown tongue.

So, you are saying that the KJV is in error in this matter?

 

[jaybird88]

Our spirit does connect us to the Lord . . . God is Spirit and He communicates with our Spirit. I don't know if Jesus taught that ALL prayer should be in silence - if he did I don't recall.

Jesus never said all prayer should be in silence, He put emphases on the silence. He never said we needed tongues to pray, He made it very clear our Lord can understand us just fine in our common language without the tongues which makes the angel language make little sense.

I think that all this being against tongues is because a lot are unlearned in the subject . . . what they have seen in most churches scare them and they want no part of it. I was also like that and I WANTED to speak in tongues but all the other stuff - the laughing, the barking, the running up and down the aisles of the church - I wanted NO part of because I thought it was not of God and still believe that it's not of God . . . the tongues are from God but not the actions that are portrayed.

i dont think its so much people are unlearned, i think its more about people being familiar with scripture and when they test such things against scripture they dont add up.

 

[posthuman]

How would you guide someone to have a tongue?

i woudn't.

 

[pottersclay]

You have to strip it of the membrane and then cook it like a roast. It is pretty fatty and very popular in Canada.

 

[hornetguy]

Where's KJV1611 when I need him?

 

[kohelet]

Hi Gr8ace,

Paul has already said that the tongues are unknown though, "...οὐδεὶς γὰρ ἀκούει, πνεύματι δὲ λαλεῖ μυστήρια" (NA28, which also uses the most reliable manuscripts): "no one understands him, he speaks mysteries by the Spirit". If no one understands him, wouldn't the tongue be an unknown one?

I don't see "unknown" in the most reliable manuscripts. Tongues~~A foreign language. unknown to the speaker.....wouldn't be a gift if the speaker knew it.......but known to the hearers who spoke that foreign language.

[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE="class: maintext, width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: top, width: 17%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]Strong's[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 20%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]Transliteration[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 21%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]Greek[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 21%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]English[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 21%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]Morphology[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]235 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]alla[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἀλλὰ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]but[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Conj[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1722 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]en[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἐν[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]in[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Prep[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1577 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]ekklēsia[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἐκκλησίᾳ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"][the] church,[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]N-DFS[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2309 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]thelō[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]θέλω[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]I desire[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]V-PIA-1S[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]4002 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]pente[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]πέντε[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]five[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Adj-AMP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3056 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]logous[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]λόγους[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]words[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]N-AMP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3588 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]tō[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]τῷ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]with[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Art-DMS[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3563 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]noi[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]νοΐ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]mind[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]N-DMS[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1473 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]mou[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]μου[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]of me[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]PPro-G1S[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2980 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]lalēsai[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]λαλῆσαι,[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]to speak,[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]V-ANA[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2443 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]hina[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἵνα[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]that[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Conj[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2532 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]kai[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]καὶ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]also[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Conj[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]243 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]allous[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἄλλους[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]others[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Adj-AMP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2727 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]katēchēsō[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]κατηχήσω,[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]I might instruct,[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]V-ASA-1S[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2228 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]ē[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἢ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]rather than[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Conj[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3463 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]myrious[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]μυρίους[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]ten thousand[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Adj-AMP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3056 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]logous[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]λόγους[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]words[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]N-AMP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1722 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]en[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἐν[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]in[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Prep[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1100 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]glōssē[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]γλώσσῃ.[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]a tongue.[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]N-DFS[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]