Trump deploys National Guard in Washington DC

[ZNP]

Another fed. judge blocked it again yesterday https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-den...l-epstein-records-criminal/story?id=124818529

Luke 12:3 Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets shall be proclaimed upon the housetops.

Amen. Lord, I ask you to watch over your word to perform it. Anything spoken in the darkness to these judges should be heard in the light. That which was heard in the ear in closets by these judges shall be proclaimed upon the housetops. This is the decree of the Lord Jesus Christ and I stand on this word and appeal that this be fulfilled. Lord Jesus you said there is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed and nothing hidden that will not be made known. You will bring every deed into judgement, whether it is good or evil. Lord Jesus, You even promised to expose the hidden motives of the heart. Amen.

 

[Squigglylines]

Luke 12:3 Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets shall be proclaimed upon the housetops.

Amen. Lord, I ask you to watch over your word to perform it. Anything spoken in the darkness to these judges should be heard in the light. That which was heard in the ear in closets by these judges shall be proclaimed upon the housetops. This is the decree of the Lord Jesus Christ and I stand on this word and appeal that this be fulfilled. Lord Jesus you said there is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed and nothing hidden that will not be made known. You will bring every deed into judgement, whether it is good or evil. Lord Jesus, You even promised to expose the hidden motives of the heart. Amen.

I thought Judge Bermans statement about it appearing to be a diversion was interesting. He then explained that the 70 pages they requested be released was hearsay and that the information everyone is after they already have in their possession(100,000 pages worth).

 

[ZNP]

I thought Judge Bermans statement about it appearing to be a diversion was interesting. He then explained that the 70 pages they requested be released was hearsay and that the information everyone is after they already have in their possession(100,000 pages worth).

If all that is true why not release it?

 

[Squigglylines]

If all that is true why not release it?

Along with the 100,000 pages he stated the WH already has in it's possession.

 

[ZNP]

I see that 66.7% of respondents to our poll say there is 0% chance Trump will declare martial law. Perhaps you might want to reassess.

BREAKING: Trump deploys National Guard to 19 states amid crime crackdown

 

[shittim]

A better definition of what the poll was asking would have been a help.
Declare Martial law for a nefarious reason? He couldn't as we have a Creator who raises up and takes down rulers, He has raised him up for such a time as this.
blessings

 

[Squigglylines]

I see that 66.7% of respondents to our poll say there is 0% chance Trump will declare martial law. Perhaps you might want to reassess.

BREAKING: Trump deploys National Guard to 19 states amid crime crackdown

Tried to explain the differences between the visions of the Christian MAGA's verses the non-Christian MAGA's vision since I joined a year ago. The problem seems to be that most Christians only look at the Christian sites and so the vision in their minds are not the same as the other two thirds of MAGA. The mid terms is the pivot point, if it looks like they may loose majority the gloves come off before the election ends. If it looks as if the majority is in MAGA's favor there's a whole set of new laws about to get passed.

 

[ZNP]

I asked Claude AI this: President Trump is talking about sending the National Guard to 19 states in order to fight crime. This does not sound like a realistic explanation. So can you provide three more plausible reasons why the President of the US would send the national guard to 19 states and not give us the real reason.

Answer:
Immigration enforcement operations: The administration might be planning large-scale deportation raids or border security operations that require significant manpower. Deploying Guard units under the guise of "crime fighting" could provide cover for immigration enforcement activities that might face more political resistance if announced directly.

Election security preparations: With concerns about election integrity being a major political issue, the Guard could be positioned to monitor or secure election infrastructure, voting locations, or ballot processing centers. Framing this as general crime prevention might seem less politically charged than explicitly stating it's about election oversight.

Civil unrest contingency planning: The administration might anticipate potential protests, demonstrations, or civil unrest related to upcoming policy announcements (economic measures, controversial legislation, etc.) and wants Guard units pre-positioned in key states. Calling it crime prevention sounds more neutral than admitting they're preparing for possible political unrest.

I responded: ICE is used for immigration enforcement and I don't see the National guard being useful unless they were expecting civil unrest as a backlash. Likewise, I am not aware of any imminent elections and this is not an election year for Federal elections.

updated Answer:
Economic crisis preparation: The administration might be anticipating major economic disruption (bank failures, market crash, supply chain collapse) that could lead to social instability. Guard units could be positioned to maintain order during potential runs on banks, protect critical infrastructure, or manage distribution of emergency resources.


Natural disaster pre-positioning: With climate change increasing severe weather events, this could be advance positioning for anticipated natural disasters - hurricane season, wildfire season, or even preparation for a major earthquake or volcanic event. "Crime fighting" might be used to avoid causing public panic about expected disasters.


Foreign threat response: There might be intelligence about potential domestic terrorism, foreign interference operations, or even concerns about sleeper cells that require a coordinated multi-state response. The Guard could be positioning for homeland security operations that can't be discussed publicly without compromising intelligence sources.

I responded: The economic crisis seems very realistic as there was a run on the LBMA silver on Friday. Also the foreign threat response is also very realistic following the summit between Trump and Putin followed by the meeting in Washington with all the NATO leaders. Can you drill down on these two theories. What else would you expect to happen if the President were anticipating either of those two options?


Answer:

Economic Crisis Theory - Silver Market Stress

Based on the search results, there are indeed serious concerns about silver market stability. The LBMA silver market is under severe strain with depleting physical reserves while processing tens of billions of ounces in paper transactions annually, and the EFP (Exchange for Physical) mechanism between COMEX and LBMA is "seizing up" with increasing cash settlements instead of physical delivery. Zero HedgeGoldBroker.com


What else you'd expect to see:

• Banking sector alerts: Preparations for potential bank runs or liquidity crises if precious metals markets collapse
• Currency stabilization measures: Guard units positioned near Federal Reserve banks or major financial centers
• Supply chain protection: Securing critical infrastructure for food, fuel, and medical supplies
• Emergency economic powers activation: Preparation to invoke emergency economic authorities
• Communication blackout preparations: Positioning to maintain communications during financial panic

Foreign Threat Response Theory - Post-Summit Intelligence

The Trump-Putin Alaska summit on August 15, 2025, ended without agreement, followed immediately by an unprecedented gathering of NATO and European leaders at the White House on August 18-19, including the NATO Secretary General, British PM, French President, German Chancellor, Italian PM, Finnish President, and EU Commission President. WikipediaCNBC


What else you'd expect to see:

• Enhanced cybersecurity posture: Protection of critical infrastructure from potential cyber attacks
• Border security reinforcement: Especially along northern borders given Alaska summit location
• Intelligence community mobilization: Counterintelligence operations against potential Russian assets
• Communication security: Protection of government communications networks
• Nuclear facility security: Enhanced protection of nuclear installations
• Election infrastructure protection: Even though not an election year, safeguarding voting systems from interference

The 19-State Scope Makes Sense For Both:

• Economic: Major financial centers, Federal Reserve districts, key transportation hubs
• Foreign Threat: States with critical infrastructure, military installations, or known foreign influence concerns

The timing is particularly telling - the Guard deployment announcement comes just days after a high-stakes diplomatic summit that clearly didn't go as planned, followed by an emergency-style NATO meeting. Both theories align with the administration's pattern of preparing for scenarios they can't publicly acknowledge without causing the very panic they're trying to prevent.

 

[ZNP]

I then asked: Also, is there any preparation that would happen immediately before the President would declare martial law?

Answer:

That's a very serious question that touches on constitutional crisis scenarios. Based on historical precedent and legal frameworks, here are the typical preparations that would occur before such an extreme measure:

Legal and Administrative Preparations

Department of Justice coordination: Extensive legal review and preparation of the proclamation language, ensuring it meets constitutional requirements and has proper legal justification


Cabinet consultation: Formal meetings with key cabinet members, especially Defense, Homeland Security, and Justice to ensure unified executive branch support


Congressional leadership notification: While not required, typically senior congressional leaders from both parties would be briefed (though this has historically been controversial)


Judicial review preparation: Anticipating immediate court challenges and preparing legal defenses

Military and Security Preparations

National Guard federalization: Exactly what you're observing - positioning Guard units in key states before the declaration


Active duty military positioning: Moving regular military units to strategic locations while maintaining Posse Comitatus Act compliance


Communications security: Securing government communications networks and preparing emergency broadcast capabilities


Critical infrastructure protection: Enhanced security at power plants, water systems, transportation hubs, financial centers

Operational Preparations

Emergency operations centers activation: Federal, state, and local emergency management facilities going to high alert


Supply chain security: Ensuring continuity of essential goods and services


Banking system coordination: Working with Federal Reserve and major banks on potential financial disruptions


Media strategy: Preparing public communications to justify the necessity

Historical Context

The last time martial law was seriously considered was during major urban riots or natural disasters. The legal bar is extremely high - it typically requires:

• Civilian authority completely breaking down
• Courts unable to function
• Regular law enforcement overwhelmed
• Imminent threat to constitutional government

The Current Situation: If your theory about National Guard pre-positioning is correct, it suggests the administration is preparing for a scenario they believe could require such measures - whether economic collapse, foreign attack, or massive civil unrest. The 19-state scope indicates they're preparing for something national in scale, not regional.


The fact that this is being framed as "crime fighting" rather than emergency preparedness suggests they want the capability in place without triggering the political firestorm that would come from openly discussing martial law preparations.

 

[ZNP]

I responded: The economic crisis seems very realistic as there was a run on the LBMA silver on Friday. Also the foreign threat response is also very realistic following the summit between Trump and Putin followed by the meeting in Washington with all the NATO leaders. Can you drill down on these two theories. What else would you expect to happen if the President were anticipating either of those two options?


Answer:

Economic Crisis Theory - Silver Market Stress

Based on the search results, there are indeed serious concerns about silver market stability. The LBMA silver market is under severe strain with depleting physical reserves while processing tens of billions of ounces in paper transactions annually, and the EFP (Exchange for Physical) mechanism between COMEX and LBMA is "seizing up" with increasing cash settlements instead of physical delivery. Zero HedgeGoldBroker.com


What else you'd expect to see:

• Banking sector alerts: Preparations for potential bank runs or liquidity crises if precious metals markets collapse
• Currency stabilization measures: Guard units positioned near Federal Reserve banks or major financial centers
• Supply chain protection: Securing critical infrastructure for food, fuel, and medical supplies
• Emergency economic powers activation: Preparation to invoke emergency economic authorities
• Communication blackout preparations: Positioning to maintain communications during financial panic

The 19-State Scope Makes Sense For Both:

• Economic: Major financial centers, Federal Reserve districts, key transportation hubs
• Foreign Threat: States with critical infrastructure, military installations, or known foreign influence concerns

The timing is particularly telling - the Guard deployment announcement comes just days after a high-stakes diplomatic summit that clearly didn't go as planned, followed by an emergency-style NATO meeting. Both theories align with the administration's pattern of preparing for scenarios they can't publicly acknowledge without causing the very panic they're trying to prevent.

Compare the actions taken prior to an economic emergency with Trump signing the Genius Act

Trump Just Signed the “Genius Act” - What Your Bank Won’t Tell You About Stablecoins

 

[shittim]

Sounds pretty cool!

 

[ZNP]

Force multiplier

https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-news/military/1700-troops-to-assist-ice-in-19-states/

1,700 National Guard troops to be ‘force multiplier’ for ICE: Homan

(NewsNation) — White House border czar Tom Homan offered details Saturday about the Trump administration’s plans to deploy 1,700 National Guard members across 19 states to assist federal immigration officers.

The troops will be a “force multiplier” for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and help with duties that include transportation and intelligence, but not arrests, Homan tells NewsNation correspondent Libbey Dean.

“ICE is overwhelmed. ICE has less than 5,000 deportation officers. We’ve got well over 20 million illegal aliens,” Homan said. “We’ve got almost 700,000 illegal aliens with criminal history that we’re trying to find.”

 

[Squigglylines]

20 million? Goodness gracious wasn't it just 10 million right before the election? We're gonna need machine gun nest,artillery and carpet bombing if this keep up.

 

[Squigglylines]

Homan said 20 million. We gotta do something different here folks because were not being invaded we've been overthrown. We only have 1.3 million military personal in active service and 765,000 reserve and National Guard in the whole US military. We need to immediately reinstate the draft of both men and women between the ages of 18 and 65 because were outnumbered 17.7 to 1 if we don't.

 

[Eli1]

I see that 66.7% of respondents to our poll say there is 0% chance Trump will declare martial law. Perhaps you might want to reassess.

I’m sticking to my 0% and I’m ready to place another $100 bet with you.

 

[ZNP]

I’m sticking to my 0% and I’m ready to place another $100 bet with you.

$100 @ 0% odds means I put up $0 and you put up $100. Is that your bet?

 

[Eli1]

$100 @ 0% odds means I put up $0 and you put up $100. Is that your bet?

Yes, if martial law happens I will pay you $100 and if it doesn’t happen then you don’t have to pay me anything.
That’s how secure I feel in this bet.

 

[Texasgal]

The chances are zero for declaring martial law. The precedence would be too unpredictable. It could make a U-turn against him or central members of the administration. He will go on with his law and order antics but that will most likely be all.

 

[ZNP]

Yes, if martial law happens I will pay you $100 and if it doesn’t happen then you don’t have to pay me anything.
That’s how secure I feel in this bet.

Well I don't think that is an acceptable bet. Instead you are at 0% but the next option was 20%, so I am going to assume that 0% equals 0-10, and the average for that is 5% even if you still want to call it 0. Therefore I pay you $5 and you pay me $100, that would be a much more reasonable bet.

The next question is what is the deadline for this bet? Obviously the declaration of Martial law must take place during Trump's administration for me to win. So I would be happy with any time frame greater than 1 year but not longer than Trump's time in office.

 

[ZNP]

The chances are zero for declaring martial law. The precedence would be too unpredictable. It could make a U-turn against him or central members of the administration. He will go on with his law and order antics but that will most likely be all.

And what are the odds on the collapse of the US dollar? How about the odds on a surprise attack on the US?