Trying to understand the rapture
In This sermon we get understanding what full preterism entails and why people believe in it , which is ruled out by the speaker, but it does look like partial preterism is something that's believable on the bases that the temple of Jerusalem was destroyed.
Trying to understand this further, is if the destruction of the temple is related to start of the rapture, then why would a person still hold to partial preterism, would they not be a full preterist, or is it the temple will be rebuilt and people will start performing animal sacrifice again, which will a sign the rapture is close ?
Other key points is a pre trib rapture would include two returns of Christ, which is argued against by speaker, his reason given for that is the meeting of Christ in the air will just be a meeting that takes place. Which seems to suggest his people will then be immediately brought back to earth whilst the tribulation starts.
Hères the sermon
In This sermon we get understanding what full preterism entails and why people believe in it , which is ruled out by the speaker, but it does look like partial preterism is something that's believable on the bases that the temple of Jerusalem was destroyed.
Trying to understand this further, is if the destruction of the temple is related to start of the rapture, then why would a person still hold to partial preterism, would they not be a full preterist, or is it the temple will be rebuilt and people will start performing animal sacrifice again, which will a sign the rapture is close ?
Other key points is a pre trib rapture would include two returns of Christ, which is argued against by speaker, his reason given for that is the meeting of Christ in the air will just be a meeting that takes place. Which seems to suggest his people will then be immediately brought back to earth whilst the tribulation starts.
Hères the sermon