Yet you reject Thomas seeing with his own eyes had anything to do with his coming to believe, even though Scripture, in the very words of Jesus no less, affirm this fact.I believe God finally opened his spiritual eyes.
Yet you reject Thomas seeing with his own eyes had anything to do with his coming to believe, even though Scripture, in the very words of Jesus no less, affirm this fact.I believe God finally opened his spiritual eyes.
Faith is a fruit of having the Holy Spirit. Maybe he was one of those with a negative attitude that needed a boost?Yet you deny his seeing with his own eyes had anything to do with his coming to believe, even though Scripture, in the very words of Jesus no less, affirm this fact.
You're saying it's impossible for the people who didn't really believe and who stopped their fake believing to repent because they don't want to be saved. But the passage says it's impossible for them to repent because it puts Christ to open shame, not that they don't want to believe. That means unbelievers can't come to Christ later, not that they won't.They don't want to be saved.
The only true scenario is Christ did not pay for their sins. So they could not believe in any true sense.You're saying it's impossible for the people who didn't really believe and who stopped their fake believing to repent because they don't want to be saved. But the passage says it's impossible for them to repent because it puts Christ to open shame, not that they don't want to believe. That means unbelievers can't come to Christ later.
The only scenario that fits is these are saved people who fall away.
Which means, according to the passage, that the unsaved person who rejects the gospel can never have another chance to believe and be saved.The only true scenario is Christ did not pay for their sins. So they could not believe in any true sense.
People do not have chances to save themselves. It they do, they are the savior. God saves all whom he will. That is why we believe. Had he not saved you, you could not believe.Which means, according to the passage, that the unsaved person who rejects the gospel can never have another chance to believe and be saved.
That's what I'm saying.People do not have chances to save themselves. It they do, they are the savior. God saves all whom he will. That is why we believe. Had he not saved you, you could not believe.
No, accepting the gospel saves nobody. If it does, they save themselves. Grace saves those who cannot believe or discern Christ in truth. If anyone receives Christ it is because they are born again.That's what I'm saying.
If your understanding of Hebrews 6:4-6 is correct, that it's talking about unsaved people, then the unsaved person who rejects the gospel can not ever be saved because God will not ever let them be saved.
You're saying it's impossible for the people who didn't really believe and who stopped their fake believing to repent because they don't want to be saved. But the passage says it's impossible for them to repent because it puts Christ to open shame, not that they don't want to believe. That means unbelievers can't come to Christ later, not that they won't.
The only scenario that fits is these are saved people who fall away.
Believing the gospel is in fact how a person is saved. That is not a works gospel.No, accepting the gospel saves nobody. If it does, they save themselves.
They are falling away from sharing in the Holy Spirit.If they are saved what are the falling away from ?
Believing the gospel is in fact how a person is saved. That is not a works gospel.
You're afraid that if the person does the believing that would be a works gospel.
No where in scripture is the works gospel defined by a person believing God.
“13 They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the Word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away (completely refutes the unscriptural doctrine of unconditional eternal security).” Luke 8In the Parable of the Sower, if the 2nd type of soil person was never really saved to begin with were they drawn to Christ on their own, or were they drawn by the Father?
"13 Those on the rocky ground are the ones who receive the word with joy when they hear it, but they have no root. They believe for a while, but in the time of testing they fall away." - Luke 8:13
44“No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them" - John 6:44
That would then be 'another Jesus'.1) He wasn't really sent by the Father. People can come to Jesus on their own.
1 John 2:19 (KJV) They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.2) Going back to unbelief doesn't stop you from being raised up to eternal life at the last day.
Perhaps but only God can be certain of that.3) He wasn't really a believer to begin. He was a fake believer.
It becomes works when it becomes a condition for salvation. In that case it turns the gospel into law and salvation into works. Are you saved because you believe? Or do you believe because you are saved?Believing the gospel is in fact how a person is saved. That is not a works gospel.
You're afraid that if the person does the believing that would be a works gospel.
No where in scripture is the works gospel defined by a person believing God.
In the Parable of the Sower, if the 2nd type of soil person was never really saved to begin with were they drawn to Christ on their own, or were they drawn by the Father?
"13 Those on the rocky ground are the ones who receive the word with joy when they hear it, but they have no root. They believe for a while, but in the time of testing they fall away." - Luke 8:13
44“No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them" - John 6:44
No, believing/ trusting in Christ is contrasted with works for justification, not equated with it:It becomes works when it becomes a condition for salvation.
No, Paul said faith and law are diametrically opposed:In that case it turns the gospel into law and salvation into works.
I am saved because I believe:Are you saved because you believe? Or do you believe because you are saved?
'No root' is an obvious figure of speech. You've probably used it yourself before. No plant grows without any roots at all.Revelation 22:16 King James Version (KJV)
16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.
Given that they have no root, how could it be that the Father have drawn them?
If choosing to believe is a condition for salvation, you turn the Gospel law and grace into works. Grace saves those who cannot believe turning them into repentant believers through the New Birth (Salvation). You believe because God saved you.No, believing/ trusting in Christ is contrasted with works for justification, not equated with it:
"4Now to the one who works, wages are not credited as a gift but as an obligation. 5However, to the one who does not work but trusts God who justifies the ungodly, their faith is credited as righteousness." - Romans 4:4-5
No, Paul said faith and law are diametrically opposed:
"12The law is not based on faith; on the contrary" - Galatians 3:12
And even if faith was a law, for surely Paul speaks of a 'law of faith' (Romans 3:27), he does not include it in the works that cannot justify but instead says it excludes any boast of self-righteous:
"27Where then is boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? Of works? No, but by a law of faith." - Romans 3:27
A 'law of faith' actually nullifies the law of works and removes any boast of works in justification that might somehow make having faith a self-righteous work of law.
I am saved because I believe:
30 “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?”
31They said, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household.” - Acts 16:30-31
Show me chapter and verse that says believing is a work of the works gospel.If choosing to believe is a condition for salvation, you turn the Gospel law and grace into works.