and he and the dcp corrupted dems are working to destroy the U.S.
The Lord can turn this in a heartbeat, keep praying!
The Lord can turn this in a heartbeat, keep praying!

Wow I missed that, when did Trump say that the FBI investigating Hillary was proof she was corrupt? I see that in quotes so can you give me a reference or better yet do you have that on a Youtube video clip......
The proud boys are under investigation for sedition. For some reason it wouldn't let me share the link but it will take you about 2 seconds to Google itWow I missed that, when did Trump say that the FBI investigating Hillary was proof she was corrupt? I see that in quotes so can you give me a reference or better yet do you have that on a Youtube video clip.
BTW I asked for references to your other assertions and you still haven't provided them.
I hope you can respond immediately to these requests otherwise everyone will think you just make this stuff up.
What has that got to do with Trump?The proud boys are under investigation for sedition. For some reason it wouldn't let me share the link but it will take you about 2 seconds to Google it
Trumps story is ever changing.
First it was that the FBI plainted evidence.
Then when the warrant was released, he claimed he Declassified the documents however the statutes they're going after him for violating do not require the documents to be classified.
How is this making it worse for him? What exactly is the statute that they are going after?Now he says the documents were covered by the attorney client privilege yet Trump's attorney signed a statement saying they handed everything over to the FBI.
What I did hear is that many of the agents on this raid were involved in Russiagate. So for anyone versed in the law you know that all evidence gained from the poisoned tree cannot be entered at trial, so this raid cannot possibly result in a conviction of a crime, at least not in a real court.
Not to mention his attorney went on Fox News and said that she advised Trump to announce that he wouldn't run and this would all go away. According to the law she waved attorney client privileged by revealing her advice.
I have no idea why him and his attorneys are talking so much, making it so much worse for him.
Because it was Trump's rhetoric that encouraged them to storm the capital.What has that got to do with Trump?
I have 0 interest in the Proud boys, you said that Trump was being charged with sedition and you said that Trump said that the FBI investigating Hillary was proof that she was corrupt. Those are the things I want citations for.
You said Trump was being charged with sedition, and now you are saying that "there is a correlation" between Trump and some group called "proud boys"? Was Trump a member of the Proud boys?Because it was Trump's rhetoric that encouraged them to storm the capital.
Might not be enough to prosecute him criminally but there's at least a correlation
I missed that, I did hear from eyewitnesses that the FBI entered with backpacks, so they brought stuff into the house, and I also heard that they wanted the cameras turned off (a request that was rejected) and I heard that if they did plant evidence they would have video evidence, but I haven't heard that Trump said they did plant evidence. Can you provide a citation for that claim?
Can you tell us what statutes they are going after him for? I heard that it was for stealing nuclear secrets but the warrant didn't say that, I also heard that it was for documents that were packed up by the GSA and if the documents were packed up by someone other than Trump then there would be no violation by Trump, so obviously that couldn't be the statute you are talking about. So please, educate us, what is the statute they are going for?
How is this making it worse for him? What exactly is the statute that they are going after?
Here is what I did hear that they are claiming
They are claiming, on Maria Bartiromos show this morning, that the FBI agents involved in the raid were involved in Russiagate. That makes anything taken in this raid poisoned, the rule of law states that you cannot enter any evidence that is from the poisoned tree. Nothing from this raid can result in a criminal conviction, at least not in a real court
Fruit of the Poisoned Tree doctrine
A doctrine that extends the exclusionary rule to make evidence inadmissible in court if it was derived from evidence that was illegally obtained. As the metaphor suggests, if the evidential "tree" is tainted, so is its "fruit." The doctrine was established in 1920 by the decision in Silverthorne Lumber Co. v.
If FBI agents involved in this raid have a personal stake in finding Trump guilty of a crime then the evidence obtained is fruit of the poisoned tree.
Thank you, this supports the interview on Maria Bartiromo that said he thinks this was part of the January 6th investigation.Here's a story on Fox. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.fo...out-mar-a-lago-raid-see-what-they-willing.amp
"there was no way of knowing if what they took was legitimate, or was there a ‘plant?"
OK I see what your saying it was more of a suggestion. However we do now know his attorney was present.
Here are the codes they are investigating him for violating.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
18 U.S. Code § 1519 - Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1519
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071
Because it was Trump's rhetoric that encouraged them to storm the capital.
Might not be enough to prosecute him criminally but there's at least a correlation