What about Gen. 6

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,005
8,373
113
#81
Inhuman hybrids? Take a look and see for yourself. Look at all of the associated research videos to get the full picture.
If you saw a "person" like this walking down the street you would either faint or call the cops....
What are the authentic Paracas skulls? Not human. No way.

 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,684
6,732
113
#82
What is SRA/DID?
BTW.......I happen to be quite the expert in the field of Bigfoot/UFO's/entities. I have read almost every report available.
What do you think bigfoot is?
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,113
113
#83
There are many problems with that view. I will point out a few of them.

1) God pronouncing judgement and the destruction of the ENTIRE WORLD for the trivial supposed sin of blue bloods marrying so-called lower classes makes no sense whatsoever. And woefully impugns the character of God IMO.
I don't have the time at the moment to go over all these again (as we've discussed in past threads), but I'll put this one here for now:



1) the text doesn't state this ^ (and neither did I). Here's what the text tells us:

Gen 6:5 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
Gen 6:6 And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
Gen 6:7 And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
Gen 6:8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.



How does this (in the bold) sound like... one particular sin of [only] certain men [as you think I meant] (or even of angels, no less... according to your viewpoint)...?


[I can try to cover the other points again at a later time...]
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,005
8,373
113
#84
What do you think bigfoot is?
I cannot say for sure. But I have seen vast quantities of evidence indicating that they are definitely real, definitely breeding.
And literally everywhere. Rare.....but everywhere. Every state of the union except Hawaii. You get ANYWERE out in remote bush.....and bro, you will have neighbors that you will probably never see or hear. If you are lucky.

The thing is.....there are credible (though much more rare) bigfoot/ufo connected reports and they are ALL are very similar in nature. So much so that they cannot be discounted.

I will mail you some research material.
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
8,312
3,618
113
#85
I know I am new... But..., Time is short...
Has anyone considered what is written in Gen. 6:1-7? And Dan. 2:43? Would like to know what others my understand on this subject...
My opinion is a lot of people have watched way too much X-Files for their own good.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,005
8,373
113
#87
How does this (in the bold) sound like... one particular sin of [only] certain men [as you think I meant] (or even of angels, no less... according to your viewpoint)...?
I don't think that those passages point to one particular sin. I think those verses pertain to the general state of societal decay that came about/accelerated AS AN OUTCOME of Gen 6:1-4. That being literal cohabitation of fallen angels with human society. Which led to sexual sin/fornication with the daughters of men. Which then led to wicked giant offspring. Which then led to a world headed by tyrannical rebel angels and their nephilim half breed offspring, sowing horrific violence, wars, and persecution (perhaps extermination) of the Godly remnant. Sound familiar?

BTW....the judgment clock started ticking way back in verse 3. Immediately after the sin of verse 2 is mentioned.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,005
8,373
113
#88
I don't have the time at the moment to go over all these again (as we've discussed in past threads), but I'll put this one here for now:



1) the text doesn't state this ^ (and neither did I). Here's what the text tells us:

Gen 6:5 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
Gen 6:6 And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
Gen 6:7 And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
Gen 6:8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.



How does this (in the bold) sound like... one particular sin of [only] certain men [as you think I meant] (or even of angels, no less... according to your viewpoint)...?


[I can try to cover the other points again at a later time...]
BTW....I did not say "the text" said it. Because it definitely does not say that.
My point #1 was posted because you agree with this commentator, therefore I refuted that particular point.

3. They are Princely Rulers/Dynastic Rulers.
Advocates: Kline, Millard, and Dexinger.
Men of noble birth or princely genealogy married below themselves. The bene ha elohim were “sons of the gods”, a term used of kings in extra-biblical sources[5].
@TheDivineWatermark : I believe Option 3 is the most likely"
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,005
8,373
113
#89
For everyone's consideration: Paul says that this is what we battle here and now. Make no mistake, it was undoubtedly a similar kind of situation before the flood. And during the Israelite conquest of Caanan as well. One way or another. The VERY SAME battle that has raged rages on.

And these verses......DO NOT DESCRIBE MERE MEN. They are ranks of fallen angels.

Eph 6:12
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

Eph 2:2
Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
 

MessengerofTruth

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2022
688
434
63
#90
:) Here's what I'd put in an old post:

[quoting old post]


The following is taken from Dr Paul Martin Henebury's website... His conclusion, however, differs from mine (in what he views as the most likely choice among these three options):

1. The “Sons of God” are angels/spirits.

Advocates include: G. Wenham[3], Wood, Kalisch, Unger, Van Gemeren, Sauer, Yates, and Clines[4].
Fallen angels/angelic beings cohabited with humans. These angelic beings made marriages with the fairest of the women. Their offspring are the nephilim/giants of v. 4.


2. They are Sethites.

Advocates: Calvin, Luther, Poole, Keil, Lange, J. Murray, Aalders, Sailhamer, Green, Scofield, and Scroggie.
What is involved is the mixing of the godly Sethite line with the ungodly line of Cain. This polluting of the line of the promised seed (which Balaam also later encouraged) is what provoked God to call for the Flood.


3. They are Princely Rulers/Dynastic Rulers.

Advocates: Kline, Millard, and Dexinger.
Men of noble birth or princely genealogy married below themselves. The bene ha elohim were “sons of the gods”, a term used of kings in extra-biblical sources[5].

[end quoting]



I believe Option 3 is the most likely, as I do not believe Job 1 & 2 is something which transpired UP IN Heaven (but on the earth, instead), based on a study I did, in those chpts.

[end quoting old post]



____________

[many are aware of only the first TWO options]
Where would the extreme height of those referred to as giants, that were the offspring of the "rulers and commoners", come from?

It doesn't seem genetically feasible to assume that humans procreating with humans would produce such a thing, especially when you consider that there was a lot of inter-breeding going on that early, and many had a testimony of being perfect, without defect in their physical countenance.

Also, as I understand, there is a general degrading of DNA over time, so that you would expect to see anomalies more in these latter days rather than there in the beginning.

Just some thoughts I've had on that theory...
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,005
8,373
113
#91
My opinion is a lot of people have watched way too much X-Files for their own good.
No not me. But I have dug deep into some compelling research materials. With compelling results.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,005
8,373
113
#92
My opinion is a lot of people have watched way too much X-Files for their own good.
Here you go bro. Some geeky science stuff for you.....
No joke hard data analysis.



 

MessengerofTruth

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2022
688
434
63
#93
I found this, I respect him.
If you find error, please point it out, I want to know.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,684
6,732
113
#94
I found this, I respect him.
If you find error, please point it out, I want to know.
The first end time prophecy is not in Gen 3:15, it is actually in Genesis 1. Dividing the waters. We are told that the waters represent peoples, nations and tongues in the book of Revelation. Dividing the waters above from the waters below is a reference to the rapture.

Sandy Armstrong with S4C Global Ministries has shared extensively on that verse showing how it is clearly a reference to the rapture.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,005
8,373
113
#95
I found this, I respect him.
If you find error, please point it out, I want to know.
Interesting video presentation. And very well done IMO.
I concur with much of what he says. And I learned more about the somewhat abstruse Daniel 2:43-44 passage.

Thanks for posting.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,005
8,373
113
#96
The first end time prophecy is not in Gen 3:15, it is actually in Genesis 1. Dividing the waters. We are told that the waters represent peoples, nations and tongues in the book of Revelation. Dividing the waters above from the waters below is a reference to the rapture.

Sandy Armstrong with S4C Global Ministries has shared extensively on that verse showing how it is clearly a reference to the rapture.
And GREAT point on Rev 17:12 "ten kings" (present and accounted for in the time of John).....(y)
10 kings = 10 horns = 10 toes
This guy is spot on!
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,005
8,373
113
#97
Dan 10:13
But the (DEMON) prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I (GABRIEL) remained there with the (DEMON) kings of Persia.

And there we have it.....:geek:
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,005
8,373
113
#98
That is EXACTLY what I believe to be the case with UFO's and other "entities". Even the secular UFO researcher Jaques Vallee concluded after all his research that the UFO phenomenon was founded upon deception.