What Bible verses the NIV deleted.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Richie_2uk
  • Start date Start date
  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
The sad truth is that atleast 2 known homosexuals influenced the niv used in most churches today. Dr Marten Woudstra, and Virginia Mollencott. If this is not convincing enough that the niv is straight from hell, consider this- the parent company(Harper Collins) who publishes the niv, also publishes, the joy of gay sex, and the satanic bible, it doesn't take a whole lot of common sense to figure this out. The niv is evil and corrupt. Its absolute blasphemy what the niv translators did to Phillipians 2:6.
 
Brother_Don said:
The sad truth is that atleast 2 known homosexuals influenced the niv used in most churches today. Dr Marten Woudstra, and Virginia Mollencott. If this is not convincing enough that the niv is straight from hell, consider this- the parent company(Harper Collins) who publishes the niv, also publishes, the joy of gay sex, and the satanic bible, it doesn't take a whole lot of common sense to figure this out. The niv is evil and corrupt. Its absolute blasphemy what the niv translators did to Phillipians 2:6.
Click to expand...

Whether it is the NIV crowd or a team of puritans of the 17th century or whatever. Unless you know Koine Greek or Aramaic then you need to trust others to translate it for you.
 
Well, it's a long subject to discuss. I personally use KJV and will never betray it
 
Helensiv said:
Well, it's a long subject to discuss. I personally use KJV and will never betray it
Click to expand...

It's accurate and trustworthy but it's not the only version. I use the KJV myself.

The Russian Synodal version of the Bible is trustworthy also, but it's not the church that makes it 'authentic'.
 
Deadtosin said:
Philippians 2:6

King James Version (KJV)


[SUP]6 [/SUP]Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:


Philippians 2:6

New International Version (NIV)

[SUP]6 [/SUP]Who, being in very nature[SUP][a][/SUP] God,


did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;


Luke 2:33

New International Version (NIV)

[SUP]33 [/SUP]The child’s father and mother marveled at what was said about him.




Luke 2:33

King James Version (KJV)

[SUP]33 [/SUP]And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him.




Isaiah 14:12

New International Version (NIV)

[SUP]12 [/SUP]How you have fallen from heaven,
morning star, son of the dawn!
You have been cast down to the earth,


you who once laid low the nations!


Revelation 22:16

New International Version (NIV)

[SUP]16 [/SUP]“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you[SUP][a][/SUP] this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”


Isaiah 14:12

King James Version (KJV)

[SUP]12 [/SUP]How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
Click to expand...

Just so anyone reading the post I'm replying to doesn't get confused,the "Latin" meaning of Lucifer can be translated as morning star, light bringer, etc..........but the Hebrew word does not literally translate that way. It's not that the bible itself mistranslates anything, but some people will claim that's what the name "Lucifer" actually means. It's true of the particular language Latin, but not of any original languages scripture is written in. I have seen these verses twisted in crafty manners by others during my occult involvement in my pre-salvation youth. I'm only bringing this up because it just seemed like a good place to point this out to anyone who may have questions regarding these verses in comparison.
 
the niv translators had access to earlier documents than did the kjv translators. i guess they thought that if something wasn't in a fragment from the 4th century but showed up in 8th century manuscripts then it might be a later addition.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back