Offered again for your information and learning. Be blessed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SjNNAkieqw
I'm sorry sir, I missed this earlier.so these children of the Most High, are they like Adam before the fall, and like what we (believers) can be when we achieve our full potential?
i think its very plausible and could very well be correct.
i still lean a bit to believe that there is a difference between "children of" and "sons of" the Most High. we may be children but have the potential to become sons of the Most High.
Michael Heiser does a good presentation on the subject if anyones interested in learning more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-O5QfT6N1s
Well jaybird, that explains a few things. I see you've found michael heiser's presentation regarding Psalm 82:6. I am well familar with his presentation from about 4 or 5 years ago. And as I told you about two weeks ago, (that's when I posted last) you have to take the plain meaning of the Psalm within its immediate context. You then introduced to me a Deuteronomy passage and ask me to explain it.
I don't have to explain it because your the one that has to connect the dots of why or what does that passage have to do with Psalm 82? Now, you might be interested in reading the following which is a rebuttal to heiser's presentation. It is also a sound and Biblical rebuttal. Enjoy!https://www.aomin.org/aoblog/2009/10/19/die-like-men-a-response-to-dr-michael-heiser/
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
I'm sorry sir, I missed this earlier.
Would you mind telling me why you see a difference between children and sons of God?
I am most curious.
its not the best rebuttal is it. it leaves so many holes.
how did these men get into the skies?
why would men, who are not divine, be in a divine council?
the Most High is presiding over this council, i thought no man has seen the Most High?
these men were placed as judges over the nations of the world, and they were so absent minded they did not know they would die? i would not appoint someone of such low intelligence to operate a childs swing set, yet the Almighty Himself appointed these guys? that makes little sense.
i accept this passage just as it reads, the sons of the Most High are some kind of celestial beings. they were put over nations by the Most High, what the big deal? you guys act as if its some kind of sin to believe this, not like i am commanding everyone to worship them.
There are heavenly beings mentioned in scripture.
Who are the watchers and holy ones?
Dan 4:17 This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men.
And who are the elders who sat before God?
Rev 11:16 And the four and twenty elders, which sat before God on their seats, fell upon their faces, and worshipped God,
Also note that the devil came with the sons of God each time they presented themselves, which suggests, he too is one of the sons of God. I don't know if that is true or not, but it is interesting that he came with the sons of God each time the sons of God were called to present themselves.
If the devil is a fallen angel, then at least some of the higher angels might be sons of God.
It is also interesting to note that both Jesus, who took His flesh and bone body to heaven and the sons of God were able to materialize in the flesh. Which might suggest they too have flesh like that of Jesus. The sons of God in Genesis, took the daughters of man and had children. This could be why many nations had gods (plural), like the Greek did.
Just a thought.
I am by no means Hebrew roots by saying what I'm about to post here.
The scriptures were originally written in Hebrew and Aramaic. But, language is not the only the difficulty, its the very different culture that they are written from.
I was taught that the church is like a blip in time. That this will wrap up and then Israel and their prophetic words will pick up again.
So we've interpreted scripture with a western mindset, different than intended.
Paul, his revelation, is for the body of Christ, coming from Messiahs mercy to the world.
So the KJV is good with the Strongs that has put all words of Hebrew together with English, including the roots, but perfect? I would say not. My opinion would be to use many versions, and compare...knowing Holy Spirit is teacher.
I watched a video recently that was just worship, until the leader began to get revelation truth. Not of study, she said it was all new to her.
It was the same things I've posted on the not by works thread. A sign to me I was hearing too.
So....do we have to have a perfect version? No, just the perfect One teaching.
He's the key to bring unity.
i think his understanding of that scripture is gods does not mean gods but rather it refers to common people like us. like the way we refer to a group of people as a group of gods, heck i do that all the time.