Ex-Google CEO Issues TERRIFYING AI Warning — “We’ve Lost Control”
"We believe in the next 1 year the vast majority of programmers will be replaced by AI programmers"
AI is advancing much faster than anyone predicted. This is precisely what I have been arguing, that they will be telling you the changes are much further in the future to keep people from becoming alarmed.
AI is dominating the healthcare industry now, they can design and create all kinds of treatments, but they can also design and create all kinds of pathogens for biowarfare.
"Every single Phd project in Chemistry, Biology and Physics is now using AI in some form".
Think about a world in which all programming is done by AI and all scientific research is done by AI. That is the world we are now entering as you read this.
In 2 years AI will be programmed and improved by AI. Deep Mind already has a program to do this now. As a result it is inevitable that all AI will be self improving in the very near future.
Imagine a world in which everything is run by AI, designed by AI, discovered and developed by AI. It will be extremely difficult for humans to even understand what things are, much less how they work or how to fix them. We know that computers and AI can do repetitive tasks and mundane tasks, but now we are learning they can also do the most creative and cutting edge tasks. It doesn't simply replace cashiers, drivers, mechanics, and maids, it can also replace scientists, researchers, bioengineers, software engineers, etc.
Within 3 years we will have AGI. This means that the AI will not simply be ChatGPT level, but will be at the level of the best human on any topic. If you want to design a house, simply ask it to do that, if you want it to give you legal advice or medical advice just ask it. That may not eliminate every job but it certainly means we don't need to pay humans anymore than simply a minimum wage. That is 3 years away!
The good news is it can take away most jobs in three years, the bad news is it will take enormous amounts of power, so we won't need humans for jobs and we can't afford to let useless humans use power that we need for AI.
Consider this, the PC was first made in 1975, about 35 years earlier the first computer was being made to break German codes, and in 2005 we first had Youtube. So we have had a full 65 years to go from having a computer do something amazing to a full fledged internet. It took us about 80 years before we had our first glimpse of AI. But within a short period of 7-8 years AI will go from not very good to Super intelligence. We had 80 years to make the transition to the computer age, and now we are going to have at most, 8 years to make the transition to AI.
He argues that in all times in the past automation didn't take jobs, it simply caused them to be changed. I disagree. Automation has taken jobs, it took jobs from horses, and cows and oxen. But those machines could not build themselves, the AI can do that. Those machines could not sell themselves, the AI can do that. Those machines could not fix themselves, robots are being designed that can do that.
AI does not require that we create a new industry, we already have a computer industry, a network industry, a power industry, etc. It does not require we train programmers, it will do that. I do agree it will make workers more productive, but that means one lawyer with AI will be able to do what five or six lawyers did. But it is worse, I can imagine people preferring to go to court with an AI judge or arbitration will be done with an AI judge. I can also imagine an AI lawyer like Turbotax that can answer 50% of the questions that normally a lawyer would have needed to answer. Likewise, instead of seeing a doctor I think 50% of your medical questions will be able to be answered by an AI. So service will be better, cheaper, faster, but at the same time a clinic will likely need half the staff to do the work it now does. The argument that AI will increase productivity without taking jobs doesn't hold water. Already we are seeing fully automated fast food restaurants that can operate without any workers. No workers means no liability, faster service, cheaper prices. Why would anyone prefer a sixteen year old kid who makes viral videos to make his food instead of a robot?
For example, all these computer programmers who are being laid off, is there a new job that the AI is creating for them to go into? No.