The table gave us enough information to say with certainty that Both Isaiah and John were talking of the same City, The same Jerusalem and the same Bride.
So far:
I. The Bride of the Lamb is not the same as the Church, but the Price for the Church. (Revelation 3:12)
II. The Price, the wife, the Bride the New Jerusalem is not only for the Church but also for the Patriarchs and Prophets. (Hebrews 11)
III. The Church has never been forsaken and desolated while Jerusalem was. (Isaiah 62)
a. (New) Jerusalem sons (children) shall marry Jerusalem (Isaiah 62)
b. God as the Bridegroom and Jerusalem son (children) as a young man, is a parallel fulfilment of Jesus as (the bridegroom) being the Head, and the Church his body (young man) and the NEW JERUSALEM,THE WIFE, THE BRIDE, THE CITY OF GOD. (Isaiah 62)
IV. The New Jerusalem is also the City of God and Not the Church. (Isaiah 60, Revelation 21)
Therefore the Church is not the Bride; it is not the New Jerusalem and it is not the City of God.
So far:
I. The Bride of the Lamb is not the same as the Church, but the Price for the Church. (Revelation 3:12)
II. The Price, the wife, the Bride the New Jerusalem is not only for the Church but also for the Patriarchs and Prophets. (Hebrews 11)
III. The Church has never been forsaken and desolated while Jerusalem was. (Isaiah 62)
a. (New) Jerusalem sons (children) shall marry Jerusalem (Isaiah 62)
b. God as the Bridegroom and Jerusalem son (children) as a young man, is a parallel fulfilment of Jesus as (the bridegroom) being the Head, and the Church his body (young man) and the NEW JERUSALEM,THE WIFE, THE BRIDE, THE CITY OF GOD. (Isaiah 62)
IV. The New Jerusalem is also the City of God and Not the Church. (Isaiah 60, Revelation 21)
Therefore the Church is not the Bride; it is not the New Jerusalem and it is not the City of God.