It doesn't take much time to answer the main thread question.This is a good example of a time-wasting thread.
It doesn't take much time to answer the main thread question.This is a good example of a time-wasting thread.
If you believe there is one version of "Faith Alone" and "Scripture Alone" POST IT!!!
Do you believe your version of "Faith Alone" and "Scripture Alone" is the only one binding?1.) Faith is counted as Righteousness
2.) Man does not live by bread alone but by every word (scripture) that comes from the mouth of God
Why don't you develop your own version of "Faith Alone" and "Scripture Alone" and have it patented at the Patent Office? Then you won't have to keep asking this question.It doesn't take much time to answer the main thread question.
There are no versions of those two statements. They are self defining.You didn't answer the question; Whose version of "Faith Alone" and "Scripture Alone" is binding?
Not when someone gets it wrong.There are no versions of those two statements. They are self defining.
If I do that, will I get to enforce my version of "Faith Alone" and Scripture Alone" as binding?Why don't you develop your own version of "Faith Alone" and "Scripture Alone" and have it patented at the Patent Office? Then you won't have to keep asking this question.
Get off the gas with the nebulous plop.Your eternal destiny!
I asked, whose version of "Faith Alone" and "Scripture Alone" is binding; I am not asking if there is any context or reason to believe that there is anyone who is getting these statements wrong.Many have asked you for clarification. You have yet to be able to articulate any context or reason to believe that there is anyone who is getting these statements wrong. I think it would be prudent to spare the scoffing.
Thus far this seems a troll.
Then you have my answer. There are no versions, the terms are self defining.I asked, whose version of "Faith Alone" and "Scripture Alone" is binding; I am not asking if there is any context or reason to believe that there is anyone who is getting these statements wrong.
Please define "Faith Alone" and "Scripture Alone" in a way which is binding on everyone.Then you have my answer. There are no versions, the terms are self defining.
You know what words mean. I answered your question. We have no farther conversation. Until you answer my question.Please define "Faith Alone" and "Scripture Alone" in a way which is binding on everyone.
Your version of "Faith Alone" and "Scripture Alone" isn't binding on anybody.You know what words mean. I answered your question. We have no farther conversation. Until you answer my question.
I dont have a version. The words mean what they mean. Its not my job to bind people. That is the job of the Holy Spirit.Your version of "Faith Alone" and "Scripture Alone" isn't binding on anybody.
John 20
"And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name."
Read the rest of the book and count how many times the word believe (th, d) is used.
You'll have the answer if you use the King James Bible.
Heaven is by ...alone
Race Runner,Is Binding?
I wasn't dragging kjvo into this. This was a response to RaceRunners question. I discovered after much reading that the KJV has a certain number of times that was not the same with the others that I checked.There is no need to drag KJV-onlyism into this.