faith minus works is faith alone.
next??
JHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA I laughed out loud when I seen this HAHAHHAHAHHHA if it wasn't so tragic I suppose....!
faith minus works is faith alone.
next??
JHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA I laughed out loud when I seen this HAHAHHAHAHHHA if it wasn't so tragic I suppose....!
and dead......faith minus works is faith alone.
next??
well..
for by grace we HAVE BEEN saved by grace through faith. NOT OF WORKS. lest anyone should boast.
Faith minus works equals faith alone..lol!
- Found only in the Gospel of John, the Greek word translated “it isfinished” is tetelestai, an accounting term that means “paid in full.” When Jesus uttered those words, He was declaring the debt owed to His Father was wiped away completely and forever.
and dead......
James 2:17-20King James Version (KJV)
[SUP]17 [/SUP]Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.
[SUP]18 [/SUP]Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
[SUP]19 [/SUP]Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
[SUP]20 [/SUP]But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
Nope. we do not contradict paul and say it is dead. We have to make them agree.
Paul says those saved by grace through faith NOT WORKS. will work (eph 2: 10)
James said, if we do not have the works paul said we will have in vs 10, we do not have the faith required in vs 8-9. Our faith was dead.
But is is still faith alone, not works. Paul said it not me.
faith minus works equals faith alone, no matter how you try to spin it.
what happens to the people saved by faith not works (faith alone) ?
eph 2: 10, For we (those abed by faith alone) are his workmanship (god is doing a work in us) created (new creature) for GOOD WORKS.
that is because Paul was speaking about works of the law.......and James works of faith...you don't have to make anything work...just read scripture how it is supposed to be read....
No.
He was talking about works which one could boast of. At no point did he say works of the law. Your adding to the word of God. Shame Shame
ps. Water baptism was a work of the law.. next!
No.
He was talking about works which one could boast of. At no point did he say works of the law. Your adding to the word of God. Shame Shame
ps. Water baptism was a work of the law.. next!
works of the law was the only thing one could have boasted of before the coming of Christ...The Jews actually boasted about it, so it has to be what Paul is talking about....
You have not studied history very much have you? the pagans were a very ritualistic works based religion. Paul was sent to the gentiles to teach them. So when paul spoke of them about works, Unless he specifically said works of the law. They would have understood him to mean works of any type. either pagan works, or jewish works.
If anything James would have spoke of the works of the law. James spoke to people who practiced works of the law. They would more than likely thought Ja,es meant works of the law. they gentile pegans who have come to God through pauls message.
does the scripture say we are saved by grace... through faith?
or does the scripture say we are saved by faith alone?
The teaching of disciples would have put distinct lines between the Law of Yahweh and any other system...
Mattithyah 15:2-3, "Why do Your disciples transgress the traditions of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat. But He answered, and said to them: And why do you transgress the Laws of Yahweh by your traditions?"
If you look at all the Messiah's interactions with the pharisees, He went out of His way to break their law while keeping Yahweh's Law. FACT.
You have not studied history very much have you? the pagans were a very ritualistic works based religion. Paul was sent to the gentiles to teach them. So when paul spoke of them about works, Unless he specifically said works of the law. They would have understood him to mean works of any type. either pagan works, or jewish works.
If anything James would have spoke of the works of the law. James spoke to people who practiced works of the law. They would more than likely thought Ja,es meant works of the law. they gentile pegans who have come to God through pauls message.
Oh, and PS. people did boast of baptism..
I was baptised of paul, I was baptised of apollos etc etc.
People boasted of it all the time, and paul had to defeat this boasting.
you have to consider that it is easy for a gentile to want to gravitate toward the Jewish customs ....no works the gentiles did were ever considered as works that could save...but works of the law were considered works of righteousness which could save ....the works that Paul referred to had to be works that one would consider to be able to save...not just any work....when one look at the text there is the indication of comparison and the only work that could be compared to grace through faith is works of the law......Yes he did.. He never broke the sabbath, he broke their sabbath. He did it purposely to mock them. (and people say he did not have a sense of humor)
When speaking to jews, yes I think he would talk alot of the law. But when speaking to gentiles. I think they did not make a distinction.
When paul said we are saved by faith, not work. I do not think he differentiated anything, I think he meant works of any type. whether of the law, religion or any deed. Same it titus, when he spoke of works of righteousness. I think he just meant good deeds of any type.