1 Woe to her that is filthy and polluted, to the oppressing city! 2 She obeyed not the voice; she received not correction; she trusted not in the Lord; she drew not near to her God. 3 Her princes within her are roaring lions; her judges are evening wolves; they gnaw not the bones till the morrow. Let’s look at this recent case with Hunter Biden. They found pictures and emails on his computer implicating Hunter, Joe, and Hunter’s brother in a corruption scheme selling access to key policy makers. However a day later the response is that this is a Russian disinformation campaign. So then that claim proves someone is lying and it proves this is a very big story about corruption. If it is true Joe Biden’s campaign is lying about it because they realize it is evidence of him committing a felony and selling out the country. If Biden’s campaign is right in saying this is Russian disinformation that the NY Post is publishing that is equally concerning. Rudy Guiliani is the one pushing this story, they are accusing him of spreading lies. So it is confusing, but what is telling is what everyone agrees to be true. First, even the campaign agrees that the pictures that were found on his computer are true. They depict Hunter Biden as a profligate person and a drug addict. During the first debate Joe Biden defended his son saying that he had problems, he couldn’t deny he had been kicked out of the military due to his drug use. But, he was working through these problems (cue the Rocky theme music) and like many other Americans who had drug problems he was picking himself back up and rebuilding his life. These pictures prove that depiction was a lie because the multi million dollars he received for a job involving making introductions was given to him by both the Ukrainians and Chinese while he was a profligate and drug addict. Also, no one denies that he was making millions of dollars from both the Chinese and Ukrainians to make introductions when his father was Vice President. What is also stunning to me is that Joe Biden has said repeatedly that he didn’t ever talk to his son about his business. Really? I have a son and daughter who are both working and we often talk about their business and how that is going. This claim by Joe tells me he knew there was a horrible conflict of interest and appearance of evil. So much so that he has to even deny he knew anything about it. Also, no one denies that Joe Biden pressured the Ukrainian government to fire the man who was investigating his son’s business for corruption. So what exactly do they deny? The emails are from Hunter complaining that he has to give half of his money to his dad, that he gets no respect, and it describes him setting up a meeting with Joe Biden on a certain day. Joe’s campaign has a very specific denial, they say on the date in question that there was no meeting set up with this man “on the calendar”. Yes, there was a large gap in his schedule that is unaccounted for on this day and they don’t deny that he might have met with this man, only that “it wasn’t on the calendar”. This is how liars respond to accusations. Any honest person would have said “I never met this person”. Also when asked if he received money from Hunter he says “he never talked to his son about his business”. Again, trying to pass off an answer to a question not asked as an answer to the question that was. But this is only part of the scandal. The second part is that Facebook and Twitter both blocked every attempt to reference this article from the NY Post. The hypocrisy in this action was incredible. They tried to give various justifications that were absurd. They said it was their policy to not accept a story like this unless Hunter Biden approved! That is laughable. It is like saying we won’t accept stories of Trump’s tax return unless he first approves! So they were excoriated by a variety of news outlets around the world and have since rewritten their policy and completely been exposed for their deceit. But that too is only part of the story. Apparently the FBI also had this evidence and dismissed it as “Russian disinformation”. Think about that for a minute. There was a three year investigation of Trump due to the allegation made by Clinton’s camp of Trump working with the Russians. They spent millions on the investigation, had an impeachment hearing, and did everything in their power to find evidence that would indict the president. During this time I supported the investigation 100%. My thought was if he is guilty I want to know, if he is innocent I want to know. Many complained about the time and expense and my position was “it is well worth the cost to know the answer to this question”. Yet now you actually have real, physical evidence that proves, unequivocally that there was interference in our government at the highest level. Either you have Ukrainian and Chinese buying influence with the Vice President, or you have Russians spreading disinformation during a presidential election. You have clear evidence of the crime they spent three years investigating and they just dismiss it out of hand without opening an investigation? So then, in conclusion:
Attachments
-
42.6 KB Views: 1