Apostle Paul On Tongues In 1 Corinthians

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Cee

Senior Member
May 14, 2010
2,169
473
83
True Gospel.

Jesus died so we wouldn't be condemned? That's not the whole reality. We are now His temples. He died that we might be united with Him. And through Him being with us. We can reveal Christ to the Earth through our lives.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
I have wrote longer posts about the love of God. And you liked them so I know you've read them, so why would you state something like this? You know already my passion about the love of God.

Pursue love and earnestly desire spiritual gifts. It is NOT one or the other, but both. And my post about the importance of spiritual gifts doesn't change my position on the primary importance on love. Love is not aside, but the reason why we desire spiritual gifts. I didn't know we needed to address that foundation again I am trying to build on the foundation of love. I seriously don't understand why you would take the stance you have knowing how passionately I've written about the love of God being the most important thing for us to receive and release.
Well this post does not seem to line up well with what you have written on Love, it just had a different tone, that is all I

can say.


You should really start a thread on on "thy kingdom come" it would be an interesting topic because as I have said I really do not see how you are applying this scripture but maybe further discussion would help.
 

Cee

Senior Member
May 14, 2010
2,169
473
83
The idea Paul was using hyperbole is completely blown out of the water because he illustrates that no one understands tongues, but God when he addresses unbelievers entering if only tongues are being spoken. What does Paul say, won't they think you're out of your minds? It appears Paul was serious when he said tongues is a private language only God understands. That's why he says we need an interpretation when we are around people and not in private.
 

Cee

Senior Member
May 14, 2010
2,169
473
83
Fair enough.

God is love. So the reality of Him in our lives is very important.

God is also a spirit. And the things of God are foolishness to the fleshly mind. Spiritual things are spiritually discerned.

When Jesus healed people, He reveals, I set them free from the "oppression of Satan". When we see the world through the lens that it is oppressed by the enemy without the reality of God. And it is the power of God that sets the captives free. We become enrolled as followers of Christ. And He is love.

Love desires spiritual gifts. Especially for building up the church.

Well this post does not seem to line up well with what you have written on Love, it just had a different tone, that is all I

can say.


You should really start a thread on on "thy kingdom come" it would be an interesting topic because as I have said I really do not see how you are applying this scripture but maybe further discussion would help.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
The idea Paul was using hyperbole is completely blown out of the water because he illustrates that no one understands tongues, but God when he addresses unbelievers entering if only tongues are being spoken. What does Paul say, won't they think you're out of your minds? It appears Paul was serious when he said tongues is a private language only God understands. That's why he says we need an interpretation when we are around people and not in private.


You really just keep cracking me up "blown of the water" so so funny!!

If only, if only an angel would just come down from heaven right this minute to explain to you that each time they appeared on earth the used an earthly language!!
 

Cee

Senior Member
May 14, 2010
2,169
473
83
You're right they did.

Because the angels were speaking TO men.

Tongues is speaking TO God.

So back to Paul's illustration of the need of interpreters with tongues being spoken.



You really just keep cracking me up "blown of the water" so so funny!!

If only, if only an angel would just come down from heaven right this minute to explain to you that each time they appeared on earth the used an earthly language!!
 
Last edited:

BenFTW

Senior Member
Oct 7, 2012
4,834
981
113
33
You're right they did.

Because the angels were speaking TO men.

Tongues is speaking TO God.

So back to Paul's illustration of the need of interpreters with tongues being spoken.
Out of the ball park. :p
 
Mar 23, 2016
6,857
1,646
113
UnderGrace said:
A bit of position change I think?
How so?

I believe this verse – 1 Cor 14:15 What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
What's to stop people from saying everything they don't like or agree with in Scripture is hyperbole? Universalists use this approach often.
Historical and textual context. Leading of the Holy Spirit in opening the meaning of the scripture.
Was Jesus being serious when He said He and the Father are one? Or was He using hyperbole to stress a point? Or how about when He said He alone is the way to the Father? The path of hyperbole is the ear mark of religion. This is exactly what had Pharisees discounting Scripture of their time because tradition used the argument of hyperbole to ignore commands or ideas they didn't feel comfortable with. Ignoring clear Scripture not just one, but several under the argument of "they didn't really mean it" is very dangerous for our growth in Christ.
Typical red herring. You misstate a truth to create a false narrative.
I see this so often. I could give you a ton of examples. It is always the argument that is the cornerstone of Biblical interpretation error.

And especially scary about this argument is when it is made because of an emotional bias. An emotional volition says I refuse to believe this no matter how much evidence is presented. I have a few of these for example I know Jesus died for my sins no matter the logical evidence. But it is extremely prudent on our part to be able separate these conclusions.

I make very sure in my thought processes I know what Scripture says and what I believe Scripture is saying. One is truth and the other is opinion. I also ensure that my interpretative foundation is built on several clear Scriptures.

And one thing I am extremely wary of is logical conclusions, emotional suppositions, one off Scriptures, and unclear passages being the interpretive foundation to perceive Scripture through. Also whenever a new theology or knowledge of God is being presented, I ask Him myself what His thoughts are. And finally if my conclusions or someone else's comes against the revealed life of Christ who is the Image we've been given to know God, then I will look into the basic build blocks or components of the revelation to find the core truth. And once this is finished, I like to run through the conclusion against the pattern of Scripture and what I know to be true.

So, while I don't discount the argument of hyperbole it is extremely u likely and unwanted in my interpretative bias when looking at context and audience of Scripture. Each of those can be twisted if we are not building on the Rock, which is the clear revelations of Christ.
Do you have a heart that seeks the truth of Gods word?

You only know what you want to know and will not allow God to change your thinking.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
You're right they did.

Because the angels were speaking TO men.

Tongues is speaking TO God.

So back to Paul's illustration of the need of interpreters with tongues being spoken.
How can you possibly conclude that God is pleased with His child speaking to Him and not knowing what he is saying? What kind of god do you worship?

New age mysticism has created a god who is not God. You are espousing paganism to a "T".

Heb 4:16 Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.

vs

Mt 6:7 But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Mar 23, 2016
6,857
1,646
113
notuptome said:
How can you possibly conclude that God is pleased with His child speaking to Him and not knowing what he is saying?
When a believer prays in tongues, he/she blesses with the Spirit (1 Cor 14:16) and gives thanks well (1 Cor 14:17).

I, as a child of God, want to bless with the Spirit and give thanks well.

Please allow me the pleasure of doing so without your constant harping that I am not pleasing to Father in allowing the manifestation of tongues in my life. Thank you.



notuptome said:
What kind of god do you worship?
I worship the God and Father of my Lord Jesus Christ. The God Who desires us to worship Him in spirit and in truth.

John 4:23,24 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.



notuptome said:
Heb 4:16 Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.

vs

Mt 6:7 But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.
Really???

You believe that the manifestation of tongues (which is energized by Holy Spirit and it is the Holy Spirit Who gives the utterance) is the same as the vain repetitions of the heathen???
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113

When a believer prays in tongues, he/she blesses with the Spirit (1 Cor 14:16) and gives thanks well (1 Cor 14:17).

I, as a child of God, want to bless with the Spirit and give thanks well.

Please allow me the pleasure of doing so without your constant harping that I am not pleasing to Father in allowing the manifestation of tongues in my life. Thank you.

You have created a practice and doctrine that lacks any biblical support. How can you say there is blessing apart from understanding?
I worship the God and Father of my Lord Jesus Christ. The God Who desires us to worship Him in spirit and in truth.

John 4:23,24 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
How can there be Spirit and Truth without understanding? It is like saying that one can be saved in Jesus name without knowing that Jesus is God the Father incarnate.
Really???

You believe that the manifestation of tongues (which is energized by Holy Spirit and it is the Holy Spirit Who gives the utterance) is the same as the vain repetitions of the heathen???
Without understanding how can one tell the difference? According to you even the speaker does not know the difference.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Mar 23, 2016
6,857
1,646
113
notuptome said:
How can you say there is blessing apart from understanding?
Please read Scripture with clarity ---

1 Corinthians 14:

14 For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.

15 What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also.

16 Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest?



When a believer speaks in tongues, it is his/her spirit praying. In 1 Cor 14:15, Paul said he prayed in tongues (his words "with the spirit") and he prayed with his understanding. Both methods of prayer are acceptable to God and He hears from Heaven.



notuptome said:
How can there be Spirit and Truth without understanding? It is like saying that one can be saved in Jesus name without knowing that Jesus is God the Father incarnate.
Your argument is flawed. One cannot speak in tongues without having first been born again (saved).



notuptome said:
reneweddaybyday said:
You believe that the manifestation of tongues (which is energized by Holy Spirit and it is the Holy Spirit Who gives the utterance) is the same as the vain repetitions of the heathen???
Without understanding how can one tell the difference? According to you even the speaker does not know the difference.
When the believer speaks in tongues, he/she definitely knows the difference between the energizing by Holy Spirit / Holy Spirit giving the utterance vs. "the vain repetitions of the heathen".

And Father God knows the difference.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113

Please read Scripture with clarity ---

1 Corinthians 14:

14 For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.

15 What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also.

16 Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest?

When a believer speaks in tongues, it is his/her spirit praying. In 1 Cor 14:15, Paul said he prayed in tongues (his words "with the spirit") and he prayed with his understanding. Both methods of prayer are acceptable to God and He hears from Heaven.

I am reading with clarity it is you that have carried over and confused praying in the Spirit with praying in tongues. That is not what Paul has said. He clearly delineates between tongues and praying with understanding.
Your argument is flawed. One cannot speak in tongues without having first been born again (saved).
That is simply not true. You see it that way because you cannot entertain that there are tongues that are not produced by the Holy Spirit but by the will of man. Not all but surely some.
When the believer speaks in tongues, he/she definitely knows the difference between the energizing by Holy Spirit / Holy Spirit giving the utterance vs. "the vain repetitions of the heathen".

And Father God knows the difference.
While it is true that God knows there is certainly reasonable doubt about the ability of those who claim to speak being correct since doctrine that is biblically based is not a priority with them.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Mar 23, 2016
6,857
1,646
113
notuptome said:
That is not what Paul has said. He clearly delineates between tongues and praying with understanding.
Right. And he says in 1 Cor 14:16 that when speaking in tongues, thou shalt bless with the spirit and speaking in tongues is giving thanks well.



notuptome said:
there are tongues that are not produced by the Holy Spirit but by the will of man.
I don't know where you get your information but there absolutely are not tongues "that are not produced by the Holy Spirit".

If you are listening to something that is not produced by the Holy Spirit, it is absolutely not the manifestation of kinds of tongues.



notuptome said:
reneweddaybyday said:
When the believer speaks in tongues, he/she definitely knows the difference between the energizing by Holy Spirit / Holy Spirit giving the utterance vs. "the vain repetitions of the heathen".

And Father God knows the difference.
While it is true that God knows there is certainly reasonable doubt about the ability of those who claim to speak being correct since doctrine that is biblically based is not a priority with them.
Why do you make such outlandish statements? How do you know "doctrine that is biblically based is not a priority" with believers who speak in tongues?

You throw out blanket statements without considering the fact that the manifestation of tongues is still energized by God in our day and time.

Get over your doubt/fear of the manifestation, start letting God be God, and let Him decide who, what, where, when, how.
 

Cee

Senior Member
May 14, 2010
2,169
473
83
If you're going to comment in my posts, saying I am wrong, without Scripture to support your Biblical reasonings save yourself the trouble, I'm not interested in your opinions.
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
The word spirit here in Greek is which also means breath. He is taking about language so in context he is using it to mean breath.

This is the direct relationship to the context of the passage where he talking about speaking and language.

I believe it was you who said understand in Context so you do not get conned. ( I know you said it better:))

When he is talking about spiritual it is translated as spiritual


pneuma: wind, spirit


Original Word: πνεῦμα, ατος, τό
Part of Speech: Noun, Neuter
Transliteration: pneuma
Phonetic Spelling: (pnyoo'-mah)
Short Definition: wind, breath, spirit

Definition: wind, breath, spirit.





it is always interesting to see how those who choose to disbelieve what scripture plainly states, manage to twist and stretch things to suit their opinions

when a person comes in with a preconceived notion, and they desire to teach, rather than listen to the Word and the knowledge and wisdom of those who actually know what they are talking about, just about nothing you will ever say will change their mind

isn't that right?

thing is, these things are spiritually discerned, so, if the mind refuses, the truth is not getting in
 
R

RBA238

Guest
it is always interesting to see how those who choose to disbelieve what scripture plainly states, manage to twist and stretch things to suit their opinions

when a person comes in with a preconceived notion, and they desire to teach, rather than listen to the Word and the knowledge and wisdom of those who actually know what they are talking about, just about nothing you will ever say will change their mind

isn't that right?

thing is, these things are spiritually discerned, so, if the mind refuses, the truth is not getting in
Agree with your statements regarding Twisting scripture to suit one's personal pet beleifs.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113

Right. And he says in 1 Cor 14:16 that when speaking in tongues, thou shalt bless with the spirit and speaking in tongues is giving thanks well.

You are reading into the scripture and not reading out of the scripture. Paul is not inferring that he is blessing and giving thanks in tongues but in the Holy Spirit. He can and did speak in known languages to those to whom he ministered the word of God. You are like the water baptism crowd that every place they see baptism they see water. Every place you see Spirit you see tongues. No wonder you are confused on this subject.
I don't know where you get your information but there absolutely are not tongues "that are not produced by the Holy Spirit".

If you are listening to something that is not produced by the Holy Spirit, it is absolutely not the manifestation of kinds of tongues.
Hollywood has been producing tongues for entertainment purposes for years. I agree that these are not of God. The problem is that apart from biblical support there is no way that one can say with certainty that one is not the same as the other. We have the written word of God for this express reason that we may determine what is of God and what is counterfeit.
Why do you make such outlandish statements? How do you know "doctrine that is biblically based is not a priority" with believers who speak in tongues?

You throw out blanket statements without considering the fact that the manifestation of tongues is still energized by God in our day and time.

Get over your doubt/fear of the manifestation, start letting God be God, and let Him decide who, what, where, when, how.
If biblical doctrine were a priority you would demonstrate from the bible why tongues are for today and not argue against what the scripture teaches.

I am letting God Who is God be God not creating a convenient god to manipulate into something less than Almighty God.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
How can you possibly conclude that God is pleased with His child speaking to Him and not knowing what he is saying? What kind of god do you worship?

New age mysticism has created a god who is not God. You are espousing paganism to a "T".

Heb 4:16 Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.

vs

Mt 6:7 But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.

For the cause of Christ
Roger

yet your constant vain repetition of the Holy Spirit no longer has the same unction He had, is a well known fact around these forums

in fact, I wonder what you would contribute if everyone who actually practiced what God promises left the forum