Catholic Heresy (for the record)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
M

mikeuk

Guest
The problem with making some sins venial allows the Catholics to keep on sinning if they believe these sins will not keep them out of Heaven. An example would be lying. Most Catholics believe that a little white lie is not that bad of a sin and they can continue to lie without any consequences of this sin.

......

If we practice sinning because we believe the sin is a venial sin we run the risk that we will not enter into Heaven.
By the way Ken, something I intended to say, forgot in a hurry.

I think you are arguing with the wrong people with that!-
Perhaps you should address instead the many here who believe in OSAS, because they believe no sin ,however heinous , will stop them entering heaven. So all sin is venial sin as far as they are concerned.,Whereas as you know that catholics definitely believe that sin can be serious enough to prevent salvation.

So that whilst catholics are confident they can "know" they will be saved, they do not have the temerity to take it for granted, and that sooner or later we will be judged and by grace be saved, so we do take the subject of sin very seriously.
 
Last edited:
Dec 26, 2014
3,757
19
0
we, ekklesia, immersed in yahshua are not instructed to believe what we will any more than we are allowed to do whatever is good in our own sight,
nor to believe the lie and the utter heresy of the rdd(sick) hierarchy and the demonic doctrines thereof.

it might be true that you don't agree with the demonic doctrines that the rdd(sick) does and what they have practiced for almost 2000 years against yahweh and his people,
but
it doesn't matter if you don't agree with the demonic doctrines or not - the rdd(sick) does, and they have murdered more believers by many times than hitler and the nazi germans ever did, and for many centuries. - it doesn't matter if you believe this or not - it remains truth and verifiable history that many of us know and
that perhaps yahweh will allow you to find out, if he decides to show you mercy.

Chapter 4
www . reformation.org/holoc4.html

this holocaust was in the time of our parents and their parents, our grandparents.
my grandparents on my father's side were murdered by the rdd(sick) abomination in or around wwI,
along
with millions of other Jews and Gentiles, Christians and other religions, anyone who would not
bow down to hasatan. (the pope).


........
Believe what you will. I am simply explaining a plausibility argument for why I believe what I and RCC does, and also that it is scriptural in origin as is the sacrament of confession "those sins you would forgive"
 
Dec 26, 2014
3,757
19
0
also, no one in the heresy is permitted this prayer or hope
which is from yahweh to all of his children >>>

Kenneth S. Wuest
Written by Kevin A. Krall on Thursday - November 13, 2014. (Hits: 92)
1 TIMOTHY 2:1-4
New Testament An Expanded Translation - Kenneth S. Wuest
I exhort therefore, first of all,
that petitions be made continually for personal needs, prayers, intercessions,
giving of thanks on behalf of all men,
on behalf of kings and all those holding high positions,
in order that a quiet and peaceful life
we may be leading in every godliness and becoming deportment.
This is good and acceptable in the sigt of our Saviour God

who desires that all men be saved and
come to a precise and experiential knowledge of the truth


"come to a precise and experiential knowledge of the truth"

Paul is not referring to some general type of knowledge, but the precise experiential kind only by knowing God on an intimate and personal level. It is not knowing everything "about" God that brings us into a relationship with God, but rather actually meeting, conversing and spending time in prayer with God.
 
Feb 6, 2015
381
2
0
No how Christ's true Church distinguishes itself is by how its members walk in love, not in a apostolic succession. That would be more lies by the catholic church.
So you just throw out or plain ignore St.Pauls letter to the Ephesians (Eph.2:19-21) because you disagree with history and Apostolic Succession? Interesting.

I am non-denominational and walk in faith and love of the Lord Jesus Christ, and so do many others who are not in the catholic church. That alone makes them part of the true Church of the Lord, not rather they believe in a apostolic succession or not as that has no bearing on one's salvation.
Okay.... so what is it you believe that is sufficient for salvation? And what is your authority?

The proof is in the bible on the divisions, debates, and contentions among members in the early church bible days. If you have not seen that in scriptures then that shows you need to read the scriptures more as the bible clearly says this. Paul called out Peter for false teachers leading the Galatians astray, warned Timothy and other followers of the day of false teaching going on. Paul showed how members were picking and choosing who they wanted to follow, and arguing among each others on who they obey and follow; I am of Apollos and so on....
This sounds to me like Protestism of today with is 33,000 plus denominations, (yours included) all having a differnt interpretation of Scripture and all claiming to be inspired by the Holy Spirit. God is not a God of confusion! The Bible tells us the Church founded by Christ is "the pillar and foundation of truth". It's a powerful analogy. Once you remove the pillars and foundation from a structure, it warps and eventually collapses. Jesus told the leaders of the Church He founded, and no other, "whatsoever you bind upon earth is bound in heaven"; he who hears you hears Me"; the Holy Spirit will guide you to all truth". The Church Christ founded, the Holy Catholic Church, has endured in unity and in truth for 2,000 years. It has no denominations. But the 33,000 plus Protestant sects which rejects true authority and attempts to find truth through personal interpretation of the Bible (a book compiled under the authority of the very Church whose authoirity they have rejected) has a history of continuous fragmentation and doctrinal chaos.

p.s. when you say "early church bible days" you do relize that it was the Catholic Church (via the guidance of the Holy Spirit) whom compiled the bible in the 4th century do you not?

I will just give you a few that the catholic church does against what the Lord commanded; 1st they gave themselves titles as father and pope, putting themselves in place of Him and being called what He specifically said not to.
lol! I would love to have a nickel everytime I've heard this!!! You have to be refuring to Matt.23:9 where Jesus says.....“Call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven.”You, like many, often take this passage out of context. You should not read the Bible and take verses and apply it to whatever you wish. If you were to dig deeper into this passage, and if you were to read it literally, then no one can be called father. This would include our biological fathers and the “Founding Fathers” of our country. This would also contradict the commandment that we should honor our mother and father. Furthermore, there are also passages where Jesus refers back to the “fathers” of Israel. And, St. Paul in describing his very own church leadership refers to himself as the father to his children in 1 Cor. 4:14-15. “I do not write this to make you ashamed, but to admonish you as my beloved children. For though you have countless guides in Christ, you do not have many fathers. For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel” (1 Cor. 4:14–15). There are other versus as well in the New Testament, in Acts 7:2, Stephen refers to “our father Abraham,” and in Romans 9:10, Paul speaks of “our father Isaac.”

In taking the full context of Matthew 23, you see that Jesus is condemning the scribes and Pharisees for lack of humility for not looking toward God for authority but rather setting themselves up as the ultimate authority. In the chapter, Jesus condemns them for using the titles rabbi (master), abba (father) and moreh (teacher), for their own selfishness and personal gains. A very crude example of this is a man having children so that he can get a tax benefit and treats his children as such. He is taking the role of “father” for his own selfishness and personal gains.
There are times I have to question when you say that you went through the RCIA classes. For if you did, you would know that we Catholics refer to Priests as “father” as a term of endearment and respect. The priests provides for our spiritual welfare just as a father of a family provides food, shelter and love for his family. Priests, through the Eucharist, provide us with our Spiritual food; through Reconciliation, provide us with forgiveness; through mass and the Bible, they teach us about God and His teachings; they listen and give us advise; and by their vocation, they sacrifice their life in service for us and our families. The Priests and the pope is our spiritual Fathers and we are their spiritual children.

2nd nowhere does He say we have to go to a priest to confess our sins and do hail marry's or our fathers to be forgiven, as all we have to do is go in prayer directly to Him in Jesus name confessing our sins and we will be forgiven.
Well then, you better read John 20: 21-23, because upon Jesus' death and resurrection, He passed on his authority to forgive sins to the Apostles!! (Apostolic Succession)

Jesus appeared to his disciples, breathed the Holy Spirit upon them, and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.” (Jn. 20:21-23). This moment, when Jesus breathed on his apostles, began both the institution of the priesthood and the sacrament of confession. Christ gave his first priests, the Apostles, the authority to forgive and retain sins. It was his intention that all sin be forgiven though the Church by a confession of sins to the priests. The apostles passed on this authority to the Bishops and Priests. (Apostolic Succession)

The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms this; “In imparting to his apostles his own power to forgive sins the Lord also gives them the authority to reconcile sinners with the Church…. ‘I will give you the Keys to the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.’ ‘Since Christ entrusted to his apostles the ministry of reconciliation, bishops who are their successors, and priests, the bishops’ collaborators, continue to exercise this ministry.” (CCC 1444,1461)

Know I'm sure you are thinking......"Why not make a private confession during prayer?" "Why confess to another human?" Well Kenneth, keep in mind; it is necessary to repent before God for your sins. And the sacrament of reconciliation, Catholics are primarily repenting to God and seeking to reconcile with God. But there are some very specific reasons why, Jesus intended confession to happen through a priest. First, as Christ well knew, confession of sins to a priest, who re-present Jesus Christ on earth, requires a lot of humility, trust in God and the Church, and contrition of heart. The humility to sit in front of priest, the representative of Christ, and confess outwardly all the wrong things you have done is sometimes very difficult but yet very powerful. And thus, when the forgiveness is granted by the priest, the confessor experiences the mercy of Jesus himself through the priest. Second, by confessing to a priest, it reminds a person that the sin not only affects the individual but also others. The priest, not only represents Jesus, but also the entire Catholic community. God’s forgiveness, granted by the priest, reconciles the confessor to the entire Catholic Church. Lastly, by confessing to a priest, the confessor has someone to counsel and encourage the confessor, so that the sin does not happen again. For me....there is no other feeling in the world compared to the joy and peace in my soul after a good confession. God’s forgiveness through reconciliation is one of the many precious gifts given to us by Jesus.

3rd the latest thing they have done is allowing Christians and non-Christians (Muslims) worship together. Allowing unbelievers of Christ to worship side by side with them in the churches.
Are you talking of Pope Francis? If so, be a little more specific.

Many of popes have stated they have authority to put in place things that are not in the bible, even if they change or contradict. Paul clearly says no man will have this authority....
Okay.... if you believe this to be true, and like I asked before, (without a responce) give me the name of said Popes, and what part of Scripture they are supposedly to have changed or contradicted. And if..... (thats a big if) you can, please make it imprimatur (do you know the meaning of the word "imprimatur") or else your responce will not hold much merit.



Pax tecum


"For he has looked upon his handmaid’s lowliness;behold, from now on will all ages call me blessed. ---Lk.1:48
 
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
251
0
Whereas as you know that catholics definitely believe that sin can be serious enough to prevent salvation.
What is it about Jesus Christ that's not good enough to cover all our sins and guarantee our salvation?
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
So you just throw out or plain ignore St.Pauls letter to the Ephesians (Eph.2:19-21) because you disagree with history and Apostolic Succession? Interesting.
Shocking that you would draw papal succession from those verses. Terrible exegesis.
Okay.... so what is it you believe that is sufficient for salvation? And what is your authority?
Gods grace and Gods word. Ephesians 2:8-9
This sounds to me like Protestism of today with is 33,000 plus denominations, (yours included) all having a differnt interpretation of Scripture and all claiming to be inspired by the Holy Spirit. God is not a God of confusion! The Bible tells us the Church founded by Christ is "the pillar and foundation of truth". It's a powerful analogy. Once you remove the pillars and foundation from a structure, it warps and eventually collapses. Jesus told the leaders of the Church He founded, and no other, "whatsoever you bind upon earth is bound in heaven"; he who hears you hears Me"; the Holy Spirit will guide you to all truth". The Church Christ founded, the Holy Catholic Church, has endured in unity and in truth for 2,000 years. It has no denominations. But the 33,000 plus Protestant sects which rejects true authority and attempts to find truth through personal interpretation of the Bible (a book compiled under the authority of the very Church whose authoirity they have rejected) has a history of continuous fragmentation and doctrinal chaos.
Anti-protestant diatribe completely unfounded and bereft of veracity.
p.s. when you say "early church bible days" you do relize that it was the Catholic Church (via the guidance of the Holy Spirit) whom compiled the bible in the 4th century do you not?
News for you. It was not the RCC you know today. The RCC today would make even the hardcore pagans blush.
lol! I would love to have a nickel everytime I've heard this!!! You have to be refuring to Matt.23:9 where Jesus says.....“Call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven.”You, like many, often take this passage out of context. You should not read the Bible and take verses and apply it to whatever you wish. If you were to dig deeper into this passage, and if you were to read it literally, then no one can be called father. This would include our biological fathers and the “Founding Fathers” of our country. This would also contradict the commandment that we should honor our mother and father. Furthermore, there are also passages where Jesus refers back to the “fathers” of Israel. And, St. Paul in describing his very own church leadership refers to himself as the father to his children in 1 Cor. 4:14-15. “I do not write this to make you ashamed, but to admonish you as my beloved children. For though you have countless guides in Christ, you do not have many fathers. For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel” (1 Cor. 4:14–15). There are other versus as well in the New Testament, in Acts 7:2, Stephen refers to “our father Abraham,” and in Romans 9:10, Paul speaks of “our father Isaac.”

In taking the full context of Matthew 23, you see that Jesus is condemning the scribes and Pharisees for lack of humility for not looking toward God for authority but rather setting themselves up as the ultimate authority. In the chapter, Jesus condemns them for using the titles rabbi (master), abba (father) and moreh (teacher), for their own selfishness and personal gains. A very crude example of this is a man having children so that he can get a tax benefit and treats his children as such. He is taking the role of “father” for his own selfishness and personal gains.
There are times I have to question when you say that you went through the RCIA classes. For if you did, you would know that we Catholics refer to Priests as “father” as a term of endearment and respect. The priests provides for our spiritual welfare just as a father of a family provides food, shelter and love for his family. Priests, through the Eucharist, provide us with our Spiritual food; through Reconciliation, provide us with forgiveness; through mass and the Bible, they teach us about God and His teachings; they listen and give us advise; and by their vocation, they sacrifice their life in service for us and our families. The Priests and the pope is our spiritual Fathers and we are their spiritual children.
I would feel sorry for you but you get what you ask for. Luke 11:13 Jehovah God is my Father. Yep that's right the Eternal God is my Father and He bids me to come boldly into His presence and have fellowship with Him.
Well then, you better read John 20: 21-23, because upon Jesus' death and resurrection, He passed on his authority to forgive sins to the Apostles!! (Apostolic Succession)
Utter folly. This is the kind of stuff that makes people question the intellect of someone who would utter such nonsense.
Jesus appeared to his disciples, breathed the Holy Spirit upon them, and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.” (Jn. 20:21-23). This moment, when Jesus breathed on his apostles, began both the institution of the priesthood and the sacrament of confession. Christ gave his first priests, the Apostles, the authority to forgive and retain sins. It was his intention that all sin be forgiven though the Church by a confession of sins to the priests. The apostles passed on this authority to the Bishops and Priests. (Apostolic Succession)
Well Jesus did breathe into the disciples present the Holy Spirit. At this moment they were born again and sealed into an eternal inheritance. It is not in the context of the passage to grant authority to the disciples authority over other men. This is the corrupt desire for power that has drawn the RCC away form truth and prepared her for destruction.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms this; “In imparting to his apostles his own power to forgive sins the Lord also gives them the authority to reconcile sinners with the Church…. ‘I will give you the Keys to the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.’ ‘Since Christ entrusted to his apostles the ministry of reconciliation, bishops who are their successors, and priests, the bishops’ collaborators, continue to exercise this ministry.” (CCC 1444,1461)
Yawn...written by men and contradicted by Gods word.
Know I'm sure you are thinking......"Why not make a private confession during prayer?" "Why confess to another human?" Well Kenneth, keep in mind; it is necessary to repent before God for your sins. And the sacrament of reconciliation, Catholics are primarily repenting to God and seeking to reconcile with God. But there are some very specific reasons why, Jesus intended confession to happen through a priest. First, as Christ well knew, confession of sins to a priest, who re-present Jesus Christ on earth, requires a lot of humility, trust in God and the Church, and contrition of heart. The humility to sit in front of priest, the representative of Christ, and confess outwardly all the wrong things you have done is sometimes very difficult but yet very powerful. And thus, when the forgiveness is granted by the priest, the confessor experiences the mercy of Jesus himself through the priest. Second, by confessing to a priest, it reminds a person that the sin not only affects the individual but also others. The priest, not only represents Jesus, but also the entire Catholic community. God’s forgiveness, granted by the priest, reconciles the confessor to the entire Catholic Church. Lastly, by confessing to a priest, the confessor has someone to counsel and encourage the confessor, so that the sin does not happen again. For me....there is no other feeling in the world compared to the joy and peace in my soul after a good confession. God’s forgiveness through reconciliation is one of the many precious gifts given to us by Jesus.
Among the many things I might be thinking not the least of which is how can you fall for this stuff??? One mediator between God and man. Jesus Christ not the priest or the pope or any other man.

Why are the prayers of the RCC unanswered? Because they do not know and are not known of God.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
M

mikeuk

Guest
What is it about Jesus Christ that's not good enough to cover all our sins and guarantee our salvation?
It is not whether he is good enough, but whether WE are good enough to accept what is freely offered, but not always accepted.

Not just 1 john 5:16, but a lot of other verses show that sin can be fatal, and we have our part to do. 1 john 25:41 - they recognise him as lord , but it is not enough by itself. 1 john 5:13, the bedrock of OSAS believers and evangelical doorsteppers is shown by later verses as not the whole story. "know" is used in the same sense as "know you will pass an exam" - it means high confidence, not absolute certainty.

If believism was enough by itself: why is the gospel not just one paragraph long to say "just do this, and you are good forever". The answer is because there is a lot you are asked to do and not do. Nothing you do can ever be enough to earn salvation as of right, so you are saved by and reliant on grace, but that does not mean you can ignore the things you are asked to do, and asked not do.
 
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
251
0
It is not whether he is good enough, but whether WE are good enough to accept what is freely offered, but not always accepted.

Not just 1 john 5:16, but a lot of other verses show that sin can be fatal, and we have our part to do. 1 john 25:41 - they recognise him as lord , but it is not enough by itself. 1 john 5:13, the bedrock of OSAS believers and evangelical doorsteppers is shown by later verses as not the whole story. "know" is used in the same sense as "know you will pass an exam" - it means high confidence, not absolute certainty.

If believism was enough by itself: why is the gospel not just one paragraph long to say "just do this, and you are good forever". The answer is because there is a lot you are asked to do and not do. Nothing you do can ever be enough to earn salvation as of right, so you are saved by and reliant on grace, but that does not mean you can ignore the things you are asked to do, and asked not do.
John 3:16-18 indeed says believism is good enough. What we are asked to do and not do pertains to advancing the Kingdom of Heaven here on Earth.
 
M

mikeuk

Guest
OOpsss... bet that is confusing! I meant Matthew 25:41, not 1 john 25:41. Sorry.


It is not whether he is good enough, but whether WE are good enough to accept what is freely offered, but not always accepted.

Not just 1 john 5:16, but a lot of other verses show that sin can be fatal, and we have our part to do. 1 john 25:41 - they recognise him as lord , but it is not enough by itself. 1 john 5:13, the bedrock of OSAS believers and evangelical doorsteppers is shown by later verses as not the whole story. "know" is used in the same sense as "know you will pass an exam" - it means high confidence, not absolute certainty.

If believism was enough by itself: why is the gospel not just one paragraph long to say "just do this, and you are good forever". The answer is because there is a lot you are asked to do and not do. Nothing you do can ever be enough to earn salvation as of right, so you are saved by and reliant on grace, but that does not mean you can ignore the things you are asked to do, and asked not do.
 
M

mikeuk

Guest
John 3:16-18 indeed says believism is good enough. What we are asked to do and not do pertains to advancing the Kingdom of Heaven here on Earth.
We beg to differ. Interesting that no end of early church fathers agree salvation can be lost. Including some only one generation after the apostles, when the deposit of faith was handed to them by word of mouth of those who were there!

But to avoid confusing threads, I will not continue that here. There are enough OSAS threads, too many in fact!

And I ask in the end why does it matter to waste time on such arcane things? If it lessens one iota the good you might have done in life, or you sin once more or confess a little less, then believing in it is a bad thing! But If you do all that regardless, then when you are saved becomes academic, only whether you are at the end! So why waste energies arguing?

The most destructive thing I see in the OSAS debate is those who no longer think works have any merit at all, or think that if the lord wants them to do such, the lord will work their legs like a robot, to cross to the samaritan in need of their help, because they now "believe" - when it is clearly their own free will to do so or not, and the world is a better place for it, certainly worse if they do not.
 
Last edited:

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
It is not whether he is good enough, but whether WE are good enough to accept what is freely offered, but not always accepted.

Not just 1 john 5:16, but a lot of other verses show that sin can be fatal, and we have our part to do. 1 john 25:41 - they recognise him as lord , but it is not enough by itself. 1 john 5:13, the bedrock of OSAS believers and evangelical doorsteppers is shown by later verses as not the whole story. "know" is used in the same sense as "know you will pass an exam" - it means high confidence, not absolute certainty.

If believism was enough by itself: why is the gospel not just one paragraph long to say "just do this, and you are good forever". The answer is because there is a lot you are asked to do and not do. Nothing you do can ever be enough to earn salvation as of right, so you are saved by and reliant on grace, but that does not mean you can ignore the things you are asked to do, and asked not do.
You can never be good enough nor can you ever merit Gods grace.

God loves us while we are yet sinners not after we become good enough.

The Philippian jailer asked the same question. The answer was believe.

The Matthew 25 folks are rejected because they would not allow Christ to save them. If they could not have a part in their salvation then they were not interested in being saved.

Gods grace is all sufficient. The blood of Christ makes total atonement for sin. All this is only efficacious through belief. Simply trusting Gods word and receiving eternal salvation.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
We beg to differ. Interesting that no end of early church fathers agree salvation can be lost. Including some only one generation after the apostles, when the deposit of faith was handed to them by word of mouth of those who were there!

But to avoid confusing threads, I will not continue that here. There are enough OSAS threads, too many in fact!

And I ask in the end why does it matter to waste time on such arcane things? If it lessens one iota the good you might have done in life, or you sin once more or confess a little less, then believing in it is a bad thing! But If you do all that regardless, then when you are saved becomes academic, only whether you are at the end! So why waste energies arguing?

The most destructive thing I see in the OSAS debate is those who no longer think works have any merit at all, or think that if the lord wants them to do such, the lord will work their legs like a robot, to cross to the samaritan in need of their help, when it is clearly their own free will to do so or not, and the world is a better place for it, certainly worse if they do not.
You argue with God.

You mischaracterize those who teach eternal security. Works follow salvation but works do not produce salvation. Ephesians 2:10 Works flow out of they do not flow into salvation.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
L

larz

Guest
I know I am am new in this site but joining a Christian Chat/Forum site means you are joining a site that shares/talks about the Truth of Christ not beliefs out of the Bible. As we know, Deuteronomy 4:2 "Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the LORD your God that I give you" as it is enough as said in 2Timothy 3:16 "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
"
 
Sep 16, 2014
1,278
23
0
Once saved always saved is in the Bible. The problem is not everyone who says "Lord, Lord" has accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.

Matthew 7:21-23
[SUP]21 [/SUP] "Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven.
[SUP]22 [/SUP] Many will say to Me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?'
[SUP]23 [/SUP] And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!'

Salvation is received by Faith and Grace, not by "Works".

Ephesians 2:8-9
[SUP]8 [/SUP] For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,
[SUP]9 [/SUP] not of works, lest anyone should boast.

BUT, you can lose your Salvation! The problem is once you lose your Salvation you can never receive Salvation again! Once you have tossed away your Salvation you can never enter into Heaven.

Hebrews 6:1-6
[SUP]1 [/SUP] Therefore leaving the elementary teaching about the Christ, let us press on to maturity, not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God,
[SUP]2 [/SUP] of instruction about washings, and laying on of hands, and the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment.
[SUP]3 [/SUP] And this we shall do, if God permits.
[SUP]4 [/SUP] For in the case of those who have once been enlightened and have tasted of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers of the Holy Spirit,
[SUP]5 [/SUP] and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come,
[SUP]6 [/SUP] and then have fallen away, it is IMPOSSIBLE to renew them again to repentance, since they again crucify to themselves the Son of God, and put Him to open shame.
Once you have tossed away your Salvation you can never receive it again! You cannot be Saved over and over again like the Catholics teach.

Rejecting the Gift of Salvation from God is a one time deal only. After you have received the Gift of Salvation and then tossed aside the Gift of Salvation you can no longer receive it again. Once you have fallen away from God you cannot be renewed to repentance. Its over for you.

OSAS is a true Doctrine and when you do lose your Salvation you can never get it back!
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
You argue with God.

You mischaracterize those who teach eternal security. Works follow salvation but works do not produce salvation. Ephesians 2:10 Works flow out of they do not flow into salvation.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
OK, whatever you say...

Rev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
 
Y

yogosans14

Guest
OK, whatever you say...
Rev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
Good point!
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
OK, whatever you say...

Rev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
If only you knew this verse in it's proper context. What is John describing in Rev 21 and 22?

If your construct of works producing salvation was correct there would be no need for grace.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
W

WillyWally

Guest
Is it heresy to suggest that calling other Christians heretics is un-Christian?
 
M

mikeuk

Guest
Once saved always saved is in the Bible. !
No it is not, that is your interpretation of some verses, in contradiction of other scriptures , and you are arguing with an army of Protestants provable on the OSAS threads , not just catholics to hold that belief. The wide range of disparate views proves the need for authority, without which you see the endless fragmentation and schism under Protestantism.

Indeed the history of the Old Testament shows God using individuals to lead his church on earth, such as Moses, and the teaching authority symbolized by " Moses seat"

Did you never notice Ken? SCRIPTURE SAYS that the "pillar and foundation of truth is the church", it does not say " the pillar and foundation of truth is scripture" nor does it say " all truth is contained in scripture alone" ., it expressly denies it at the end of John, saying that no amount of books could hold it.

So How can you justify believing your splinter group is the guardian of doctrine, when your congregation did not exist for over a thousand years, and it was born of a schism from some other group that believed differently to you, and in turn history says your sect will schism again on doctrine? Protestantism is united only on a negative " anti RCC" they are not united on any doctrine and believe in a huge range of different things, although I discovered whilst part of those movements and since, a lot do not know what they believe, and are a mixture in the same congregation.

The hall mark of the true church is constancy of doctrine over millenia demanding believers conform toit, since truth does not change, only one denomination comes close. The hallmark of Protestantism is finding a congregation that conforms to you, and if not, starting one of your own, so how can they be the " pillar of truth"