I remember last year I was accused on here of following x-y-z people (names I hadn't even heard of before). The truth is, I didn't align myself with any particular camp, I just read the scriptures at home (on my own) and my views were a result of that (Holy Spirit guidance). Obviously there will be others who get the same interpretation, but that does not make me a follower of those people. What if said person had another completely alien view - is it to be assumed that I agree with that view also, since we both agree on one interpretation? That's scary because it leads to false assumptions.
1 Cor 1:12-13: "Now I say this, that each of you says, “I am of Paul,” or “I am of Apollos,” or “I am of Cephas,” or “I am of Christ.” Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?"
On the other side, there are some who align themselves with a particular camp, and in order to keep their chosen view they must then twist hundreds of scriptures to make them fit with said view. For example, with the preterist view there is one particular scripture that they claim is talking about Jesus when in fact it's talking of Antichrist. How can one get the two confused? It's because if that particular verse is not talking of Jesus then it shoots down their view and they don't want that. It's clear to see the verse is speaking of Antichrist without aligning yourself with any chosen view... but some must twist scriptures to favor their views, rather than change their view to fit with the scriptures. Very sad.
End of rant, just wanted to get that out there