"Men Choosing God" Does Not Seem Impossible
"Men Choosing God" does not seem impossible to me as I approach this question. I am willing to entertain the hypothesis that after God's grace & Spirit operates on the unregenerate man, he might choose God. But the question is not what "seems" possible to me, but what does God's Word say.
This thread has not concentrated on the relevant scripture, but on human reasoning as from some notion of "free will" or from "a command implies ability to choose to obey it." Yet no one seems to be able to establish that these tangential issues prove anything.
My experience as I recall it was that I was in my bedroom in God's presence. I turned my life over to him trusting the Lord Jesus with my life. The idea of "choice" was not on my mind. It was trusting the Lord.
That the imperative implies ability to choose to obey was has not been proven, nor any scripture quoted to establish it. In fact the attempt to insert "choose" into the sentence seems tortured to me; why not just say, "the imperative implies ability to obey"? Though that one also has not been proven to me.
I doubt that as
1) the Woman at the Well was ordered to fetch her husband (but she could not so choose);
2) men are commanded in the Sermon on the Mount to be perfect as the Father is
(that is not maturity -- God is not "mature," He didn't grow into His perfection);
and
3) OT says:
For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt-offerings or sacrifices: but this thing I commanded them, saying, Hearken unto my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people; and walk ye in all the way that I command you, that it may be well with you. But they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear, but walked in their own counsels and in the stubbornness of their evil heart, and went backward, and not forward.
God commanded the entire Law to Israel, and the obedience commanded was total (keeping part is not the commandment). Yet Israel could not obey God's Law -- it was impossible for them, given their natures. And in fact they did not choose to obey.
Actually, persons are trying to import choice & choose into passages that don't have the terms. Does action imply choice? I don't know of any proof of that either. I don't conceive of men standing there, deliberating, & then doing. I think a great deal of the time, men just act without choosing; and that may be their folly. I think we shall wait a long time for any scripture to prove that "action implies choice made."
Believe is not "choose." But on belief: I would like to believe that God has given every man the ability to believe in the Lord Jesus, and that men's destinies are determined by whether or not then they believe. (This is the doctrine of common grace.) However, I don't find that in the Bible! Nonetheless, the gospel goes out to whosever; he who is willing.
Perhaps someone is going to quote a verse that actually says "choose," exegete it, and help me understand all this better.
"Men Choosing God" does not seem impossible to me as I approach this question. I am willing to entertain the hypothesis that after God's grace & Spirit operates on the unregenerate man, he might choose God. But the question is not what "seems" possible to me, but what does God's Word say.
This thread has not concentrated on the relevant scripture, but on human reasoning as from some notion of "free will" or from "a command implies ability to choose to obey it." Yet no one seems to be able to establish that these tangential issues prove anything.
My experience as I recall it was that I was in my bedroom in God's presence. I turned my life over to him trusting the Lord Jesus with my life. The idea of "choice" was not on my mind. It was trusting the Lord.
That the imperative implies ability to choose to obey was has not been proven, nor any scripture quoted to establish it. In fact the attempt to insert "choose" into the sentence seems tortured to me; why not just say, "the imperative implies ability to obey"? Though that one also has not been proven to me.
I doubt that as
1) the Woman at the Well was ordered to fetch her husband (but she could not so choose);
2) men are commanded in the Sermon on the Mount to be perfect as the Father is
(that is not maturity -- God is not "mature," He didn't grow into His perfection);
and
3) OT says:
For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt-offerings or sacrifices: but this thing I commanded them, saying, Hearken unto my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people; and walk ye in all the way that I command you, that it may be well with you. But they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear, but walked in their own counsels and in the stubbornness of their evil heart, and went backward, and not forward.
God commanded the entire Law to Israel, and the obedience commanded was total (keeping part is not the commandment). Yet Israel could not obey God's Law -- it was impossible for them, given their natures. And in fact they did not choose to obey.
Actually, persons are trying to import choice & choose into passages that don't have the terms. Does action imply choice? I don't know of any proof of that either. I don't conceive of men standing there, deliberating, & then doing. I think a great deal of the time, men just act without choosing; and that may be their folly. I think we shall wait a long time for any scripture to prove that "action implies choice made."
Believe is not "choose." But on belief: I would like to believe that God has given every man the ability to believe in the Lord Jesus, and that men's destinies are determined by whether or not then they believe. (This is the doctrine of common grace.) However, I don't find that in the Bible! Nonetheless, the gospel goes out to whosever; he who is willing.
Perhaps someone is going to quote a verse that actually says "choose," exegete it, and help me understand all this better.
Last edited: