Eve & the talking Snake

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

starfield

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2009
3,393
58
48
#41
The serpent is us on the inside when we excuse our sin before we do it.
Satan is the part of our self that we hate and wish we could cast out. Our adversary. And God is going to cast Him out.
All of the physical stories teach us something about our selves. All the characters are ways we think and behave.
So you're saying we are Satan? We are our adversary, as a roaring lion, walking about and devouring ourselves?:confused:

We can never make heads or tails of a literal talking snake. But to keep the one inside us in check, will change hearts.
Repentance and brotherly love, not biblical wisdom, for the win.

The bible says making perfume that smells like dead insects is more valuable than mixing folly with wisdom, like blaming our sin on Eve and a demon possessed talking snake. Folly.
Do you believe Satan is a literal entity?
 

Shilo

Senior Member
Aug 31, 2011
1,974
102
63
#42
Genesis 4

13 Cain said to the Lord, “My punishment is more than I can bear. 14 Today you are driving me from the land, and I will be hidden from your presence; I will be a restless wanderer on the earth, and whoever finds me will kill me.”

15 But the Lord said to him, “Not sow ; anyone who kills Cain will suffer vengeance seven times over.” Then the Lord put a mark on Cain so that no one who found him would kill him. 16 So Cain went out from the Lord’s presence and lived in the land of Nod,f east of Eden.

Here's another interesting one. The fact that Cain indicates he will be hidden from God's presence and whoever finds him would kill him. Does that mean there was an indicator of God's presence that people could visually see or feel? Second thing which is even more interesting, is what kind of 'mark' did God put on cain? I've thought maybe a visual mark or else how would they know that God had marked him. Perhaps a scar, but he could hide the scar and people wouldn't know he was marked by God. I want answers!!! hahaha
2 Kings 17:23 until the LORD removed them from his presence, as he had warned through all his servants the prophets. So the people of Israel were taken from their homeland into exile in Assyria, and they are still there.

Exodus 33:14 And he said, “My presence will go with you, and I will give you rest

Psalm 16:8-11 I have set the Lord always before me; because he is at my right hand, I shall not be shaken. Therefore my heart is glad, and my whole being rejoices; my flesh also dwells secure. For you will not abandon my soul to Sheol, or let your holy one see corruption. You make known to me the path of life; in your presence there is fullness of joy; at your right hand are pleasures forevermore

Read up in your Bible about the Lords presences it is the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus. When we trust and follow him there is a peace that the world can not know this one of the ways he shows his presences. When we turn from him he lifts this and Cain shows this because he becomes fearful.



 
Last edited:
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
#43
I was thinking of the scripture story of Adam & Eve and I got into some very deep thought (almost drowned in it :p) When the snake began to speak to Eve, it does not appear that Eve was shocked or surprised that it was speaking to her. If something that normally doesn't talk begins talking to you, you'd definitely be asking questions and not have such a casual conversation with it. Considering this thought, did snakes, or other animals have the ability to speak? From my understanding if they did not, how did Eve not act confused or surprised when the snake spoke to her? Or was she so naive (no offense ladies) that she didn't think about it? The second thing, I was considering that while this whole conversation was going on, where in the world was Adam? Was he hanging out at a different place in the garden? Scriptures clearly demonstrate that Eve was having a conversation with the snake, it does not specify Adam being present. Or was he there and as usual for men not listening? hahaha. I understand that this does not in any way add or take away from my salvation, it is just an interesting thought I had and I was wondering what other individuals thought.

God Bless!

Animals talk in other places in the Holy Bible, too.

Adam & Eve also talked directly to God, as He was in the flesh with them.

Thus, it would have been perfectly normal as they had nothing else to compare like we do today...
 
E

enoch1nine

Guest
#44
So you're saying we are Satan? We are our adversary, as a roaring lion, walking about and devouring ourselves?
Yes. With every ounce of my being. It is the only way I can be truly accountable.
Apart from Christ, aren't we each our own king? Devouring our self and others? Never taking responsibility?

Do you believe Satan is a literal entity?
I believe Satan is the bad half of every person. Whether that's spiritual or physical in effect.

When you see the abomination that causes desolation standing in the temple, run.

However, I do not believe that a person is in danger of not being saved if they don't believe this way.
Chalking sin up to an external scapegoat is the only way most people can deal with it.

"And he called them unto him, and said unto them in parables, How can Satan cast out Satan?"
But we've been taught to read it as if it weren't a parable. We think He was asking a rhetorical question as it appears in text, but it was a parable, but He was actually asking them to consider - how can a man fix himself.
"You can't even fix yourselves, so how can you even know who a third party enemy is?"

[SUP]33 [/SUP]But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men.

[SUP]34 [/SUP]And when he had called the people unto him with his disciples also, he said unto them, Whosoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#45
Sorry, mate. What you believe here is completely non-biblical. The Bible tells us that we're tempted by the flesh, the world and the devil. You're admitting that the flesh and the devil are one and the same and that's stupid.
 
E

enoch1nine

Guest
#46
Sorry, mate. What you believe here is completely non-biblical. The Bible tells us that we're tempted by the flesh, the world and the devil. You're admitting that the flesh and the devil are one and the same and that's stupid.
case in point...
that's stupid
I blame myself for my transgressions. I have called people stupid before too. But I don't do it anymore because Christ is risen in me.

But you didn't make yourself call me "stupid" did you? Because some "other" devil made you do it.

Doesn't make me mad at you to hear you say that, because like I said, I'm also guilty. But you need to understand the source of your iniquity, just like I need to understand the source of mine.
That came from inside you bro!
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#47
I'm not calling you stupid, but your non-biblical beliefs. No, I'm not going to blame the devil for my frustrations getting the best of me, that was my flesh but to say that there is no external spiritual influence that is adverse to God (the devil and his creeps), is too much.
 

starfield

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2009
3,393
58
48
#48
Yes. With every ounce of my being. It is the only way I can be truly accountable.
Apart from Christ, aren't we each our own king? Devouring our self and others? Never taking responsibility?


I believe Satan is the bad half of every person. Whether that's spiritual or physical in effect.

When you see the abomination that causes desolation standing in the temple, run.

However, I do not believe that a person is in danger of not being saved if they don't believe this way.
Chalking sin up to an external scapegoat is the only way most people can deal with it.

"And he called them unto him, and said unto them in parables, How can Satan cast out Satan?"
But we've been taught to read it as if it weren't a parable. We think He was asking a rhetorical question as it appears in text, but it was a parable, but He was actually asking them to consider - how can a man fix himself.
"You can't even fix yourselves, so how can you even know who a third party enemy is?"

[SUP]33 [/SUP]But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men.

[SUP]34 [/SUP]And when he had called the people unto him with his disciples also, he said unto them, Whosoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
So according to your theory, Jesus tempted Himself since a diabolical entity does not exist?
 
E

enoch1nine

Guest
#49
So according to your theory, Jesus tempted Himself since a diabolical entity does not exist?
Well, think about when you are tempted. Do you have some spirit creature standing in front of you speaking?
Where does the urge to ignore a rule really come from?

If that could be considered as "tempted Himself" as you put it, then yes.
He had the urge to sin, and totally repressed it.
That's why He totally blows my mind. Not because of miracles or big promises.
 
W

Widdekind

Guest
#50
Balaam's Donkey talked, in human-historical times (Num 22).

So, talking animals occur in Scripture, several thousand years later.

perhaps "everybody is correct" -- Enoch1Nine is correct, in that the Serpent's Voice was inside the mind of Eve; but also too Jorina is correct, in the the Serpent's physical body was slithering through the soil.

I.e.
the snake was real / physical / corporeal; the Serpent Voice was "psychic" / spiritual.
 
P

psalm6819

Guest
#51
Well, think about when you are tempted. Do you have some spirit creature standing in front of you speaking?
Where does the urge to ignore a rule really come from?

If that could be considered as "tempted Himself" as you put it, then yes.
He had the urge to sin, and totally repressed it.
That's why He totally blows my mind. Not because of miracles or big promises.
1 Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the desert to be tempted by the devil. 2 After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. 3 The tempter came to him and said, "If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread." 4 Jesus answered, "It is written: 'Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.' " 5 Then the devil took him to the holy city and had him stand on the highest point of the temple. 6 "If you are the Son of God," he said, "throw yourself down. For it is written: " 'He will command his angels concerning you, and they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.' " 7 Jesus answered him, "It is also written: 'Do not put the Lord your God to the test.' " 8 Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. 9 "All this I will give you," he said, "if you will bow down and worship me." 10 Jesus said to him, "Away from me, Satan! For it is written: 'Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.' " 11 Then the devil left him, and angels came and attended him.

So what esoteric interpretation do you have on this?????
 
N

nathan3

Guest
#52
Well Nathan I assume you read the original hebrew old testament texts and the greek texts of the new testament or else any mistranslation could ruin the 'literal' bible as it was intended in your misconstrued view. Guess all of Jesus' parables must be taken literally as well. The bible says God created ALL the animals ALL the birds ALL the sea creatures. Literally ALL animals right that's what says. So let's go with it for the sake of the argument. The bible gives the EXACT literal dimensions of the ark...now tell me Nathan how did ALL the animals in the world ever fit in the ark? If you really can't see that it is not so black and white, well I guess all I can say is ignorance is bliss man.
Why run to a conclusion like that, when the Bible tells gives us detail. Common sense can go a long way .
 
N

nathan3

Guest
#53
Animals talk in other places in the Holy Bible, too.

Adam & Eve also talked directly to God, as He was in the flesh with them.

Thus, it would have been perfectly normal as they had nothing else to compare like we do today...
It is not written That God was in the flesh in the Garden . Where is that written ?
 
A

amdg

Guest
#54
It's not directly written bu it is implied by the language "When they heard the sound of the Lord God walking about in the garden Gen 3:8." The J source (or is it E) frequently describes God in anthropomorphic terms.
 
A

amdg

Guest
#55
Well I would say her lack of surprise is more of an indication that the story is an allegory than a specific event.

As far as Adam goes, it directly says "gave some to her husband, who was with her" Gen 3:6 so he was obviously close by.
 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
#56
It is not written That God was in the flesh in the Garden . Where is that written ?
When God walked in the cool of the day, skinned the animals for their clothing, etc.

If you take Genesis literally, then you have no choice but to also acknowledge that Adam and Eve where in the direct presence of God, their parent.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#57
If early Genesis is allegory, why does Jesus Christ, God's own Son, refer to Adam and Eve as if he believed they existed historically? (for realz).

Well I would say her lack of surprise is more of an indication that the story is an allegory than a specific event.

As far as Adam goes, it directly says "gave some to her husband, who was with her" Gen 3:6 so he was obviously close by.
 
N

nathan3

Guest
#58
When God walked in the cool of the day, skinned the animals for their clothing, etc.

If you take Genesis literally, then you have no choice but to also acknowledge that Adam and Eve where in the direct presence of God, their parent.
That is not what I was talking about, You mentioned that God was in a flesh body in the garden, and I wanted to know, where do you think that is written because i dont see that it says that , why would that even be important to mention ?
 
S

Shiloah

Guest
#59
That is not what I was talking about, You mentioned that God was in a flesh body in the garden, and I wanted to know, where do you think that is written because i dont see that it says that , why would that even be important to mention ?
Genesis 3:8 Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the LORD God as he was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and they hid from the LORD God among the trees of the garden.

I didn't see that anyone here said God walked in "the flesh," whatever that means.
 
N

nathan3

Guest
#60
Genesis 3:8 Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the LORD God as he was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and they hid from the LORD God among the trees of the garden.

I didn't see that anyone here said God walked in "the flesh," whatever that means.
That is because you did not read Bowmans replies fully..... -_-

In Bowman's post #43 he said

Bowman:
""Adam & Eve also talked directly to God, as He was in the flesh with them.""......


So i was directing my comment about that, that Bowman said.
 
Last edited: