Flood - worldwide or local?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#41
As I mentioned The dove found a leaf, meaning it couldn't be a catotrophic flood that distroyed all vegetation on earth. the dove found a leaf a fresh one at that.
He found a leaf on a spot of land that was previously under water.. It had budded because it was now no longer under water..

Either way, Again, how this proves there was a local flood and not a whole earth flood. I am not seeing it.. I need more than that..



 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#42
Your correct in saying today's dove keepers weren't there but the Dove was there, so indeed dove keepers of today deal with the same dove that only could fly out at the most 1500 miles. The bible doesn't say the dove found a stem or a vine BUT it was a LEAF.

1. Yes a leaf.. It does not change anything though, I never said the vine was dead..
2. I would be assuming if I would say with all certainty that a dove, under today atmospheric conditions. can travel the exact same way the did after the flood... I do not like to base my beliefs on assumptions I am sure you are thee same..



Just because the account in scripture does mentions a rudder per say, doesn't mean the ship didn't have one, scripture doesn't mentions Mars but it is there in our solar system.
so did it have a motor too? (I am retired US Coast guard.. I have spend many years on the deep oceans so I think I know a thing or two about how a ship that has no power reacts. with or without a rudder. )
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#43
He found a leaf on a spot of land that was previously under water.. It had budded because it was now no longer under water..

Either way, Again, how this proves there was a local flood and not a whole earth flood. I am not seeing it.. I need more than that..



how do you know it budded, does scripture say this? If it doesn't than that is speculating as well.

No one was there to know how or where the dove got the leaf, maybe God had a leaf suspended for the dove. To say the olive tree sprouted or budded is purely a guess.

IMO I don't need a bunch of reasons to believe in what I hear and see. Just a simple statement as the dove return with a leaf is good enough for me to believe.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
#44
I don’t think it was local . The phrase; “face of the earth indicate the whole”. All life that had breathe perished. If it was local then to bring two of each creature to repopulate would seem to be out of place.

He would have just moved some to a dry place for six months. .

Gen 6:7 And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.

I think previously the highest mountain was 22.5 feet (15 cubits ). The mountains were covered . Not how high above.

Gen 7:20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#45
how do you know it budded, does scripture say this? If it doesn't than that is speculating as well.
Did it have a leaf? Then it budded..

but yes you would be right, it would be an assumption, forgive me.


No one was there to know how or where the dove got the leaf, maybe God had a leaf suspended for the dove. To say the olive tree sprouted or budded is purely a guess.
true, But then how could Noah know that the water receded then? the leave becomes meaningless if it did not come of a tree..

IMO I don't need a bunch of reasons to believe in what I hear and see. Just a simple statement as the dove return with a leaf is good enough for me to believe.

Same here, and also the statement to know that Noah because of said leaf, knew the water receded..

I am still however, trying to figure out how you think this proves a local flood..
 

NayborBear

Banned Serpent Seed Heresy
#46
True, but we still have to go by what the bible says, If god said he flooded the whole earth he did it,,



Seen? The bible does not ay the mountains that could be seen, it says the highest mountain on all the earth. mountains was covered.. not sure where you get this, can you show me?

and yes the earth is round, which helps prove a global flood
.


2 Peter 3: [SUP]5 [/SUP]For this they willfully forget: that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of water and in the water, [SUP]6 [/SUP]by which the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water. [SUP]7 [/SUP]But the heavens and the earth which are now preserved by the same word, are reserved for fire until the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

Even Peter understood it to be global flood.





The bible is God breathed, God told him what to right,, It is called inspiration.
One might think Peter was referring to Noah's flood! They would be incorrect! The "tell" on this is "and the earth standing out of water and in the water,"....According to the writers account of Noah's flood, the water was some 24.5 feet ABOVE the highest mountain, right?....If this is true?...There would be NO earth standing out of the water. Right? Apparently, then, Peter wasn't teaching concerning Noah's flood.

What Peter was teaching, or trying to impart, or "feed" the sheep, was " heavens were of old", and, "the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water." Peter is teaching about the previous earth and heaven age! Compare, " But the heavens and the earth which are now preserved by the same word," Peter is teaching about this current earth and heaven age. What is even of much more importance, is just who, or, whom Peter was teaching about! One could say, Peter was teaching about ungodly men, but it goes even deeper then this, and the whom Peter was teaching about! Which is "The OVERTRHOW" or, "Katabol"! Those that make men ungodly, and MAKE men "Willfully Forget". God caused Noah's flood, as a REMINDER to those of the overthrow! What's more?...God didn't relent from the flood waters, until, those of the overthrow, sued for a truce, via the dove with an olive branch! Remember? The raven he sent out first, never came back! There's even a demonination that call themselves "Noahhides, er Noahhites" er something like that.

(Jesus' disclaimer) If, perchance, I offended thee by "overloading your donkey", so to speak, with the truth? Then you have my permission to slap me on the face! After which I shall turn my face, so you may slap the other side! THIS, was what Jesus was teaching about in those verses, and NOT being a pacifist!
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
#47
I don’t think it was local . The phrase; “face of the earth indicate the whole”.
read face of the whole land

All life that had breathe perished. If it was local then to bring two of each creature to repopulate would seem to be out of place.
they would need animals straight away. God provided by supplying two of each of the animals they needed.

He would have just moved some to a dry place for six months. .
How if there was sea in between?

Gen 6:7 And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
Translate 'face of the land'. He was destroying man and those who were with him. not creation.

I think previously the highest mountain was 22.5 feet (15 cubits ). The mountains were covered . Not how high above.

Gen 7:20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
A mountain 22 feet high? LOL
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#48
One might think Peter was referring to Noah's flood! They would be incorrect! The "tell" on this is "and the earth standing out of water and in the water,"....According to the writers account of Noah's flood, the water was some 24.5 feet ABOVE the highest mountain, right?....If this is true?...There would be NO earth standing out of the water. Right? Apparently, then, Peter wasn't teaching concerning Noah's flood.

What Peter was teaching, or trying to impart, or "feed" the sheep, was " heavens were of old", and, "the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water." Peter is teaching about the previous earth and heaven age! Compare, " But the heavens and the earth which are now preserved by the same word," Peter is teaching about this current earth and heaven age. What is even of much more importance, is just who, or, whom Peter was teaching about! One could say, Peter was teaching about ungodly men, but it goes even deeper then this, and the whom Peter was teaching about! Which is "The OVERTRHOW" or, "Katabol"! Those that make men ungodly, and MAKE men "Willfully Forget". God caused Noah's flood, as a REMINDER to those of the overthrow! What's more?...God didn't relent from the flood waters, until, those of the overthrow, sued for a truce, via the dove with an olive branch! Remember? The raven he sent out first, never came back! There's even a demonination that call themselves "Noahhides, er Noahhites" er something like that.

(Jesus' disclaimer) If, perchance, I offended thee by "overloading your donkey", so to speak, with the truth? Then you have my permission to slap me on the face! After which I shall turn my face, so you may slap the other side! THIS, was what Jesus was teaching about in those verses, and NOT being a pacifist!
I used to be a GAP theorist.

But have since changed..

I think peter is making a point.. People in the last day will mock God saying things are the same as it has been since creation (all of todays aging techniques are based on this very logic, that things are the same,, even beyondET used this simple logic when he said the doves of today would act the same as during the flood)

And that just as they were eating and drinking then the waters came suddenly, so will the coming of Christ be

The flood was Gods judgement on eath for mans sin,, So to will the final flood of Gods wrath of fire..
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
#49
I used to be a GAP theorist.

But have since changed..


Good, so you have seen the light once? :)

I think peter is making a point.. People in the last day will mock God saying things are the same as it has been since creation (all of todays aging techniques are based on this very logic, that things are the same,, even beyondET used this simple logic when he said the doves of today would act the same as during the flood)
Reading into Peter what he didn't say? He had no thought of scientific explanations.

And that just as they were eating and drinking then the waters came suddenly, so will the coming of Christ be

The flood was Gods judgement on eath for mans sin,, So to will the final flood of Gods wrath of fire..
so it covered where man had reached to :)
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#50
Good, so you have seen the light once? :)
Or maybe iI see the light now? :p

You will have to forgive me, But we never get along in these debates.. It just turns nasty when we try, so I will bow out. and agree to disagree.. This topic is not Slavic, and would do nothing to help anyone out if we fight.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
#51
Or maybe iI see the light now? :p

You will have to forgive me, But we never get along in these debates.. It just turns nasty when we try, so I will bow out. and agree to disagree.. This topic is not Slavic, and would do nothing to help anyone out if we fight.
I never fight. I just seek to present the truth with humour :)
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#55
Have "heard" of the gap, but thought that was some "hip" clothing store from the 60's er 70's. :rolleyes:
I actually used to teach the gap and its theories to people in my church..I was so happy the first time I heard it, and studied it, I could actually finally answer all the evolutionists and scientists who claimed an old earth..

Please.. the mocking attitudes do not do you any good.. If you think like Valient they are just joking, You should think again.. They are mockery, and people see it.
 

wolfwint

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2014
3,590
879
113
61
#56
Worldwide.

Genesis 7:19-20 "The water prevailed more and more upon the earth, so that all the high mountains everywhere under the heavens were covered. The water prevailed fifteen cubits higher, and the mountains were covered."

That verse by itself is enough to "drown" the local-flood theory. Geologic evidence worldwide only reinforces it.

There are many good videos on the subject. One is "Mt. St. Helens: Explosive Evidence for Creation".
Agree, special if we consider that the landmass split after the flood to continents.
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#57
Did it have a leaf? Then it budded..

but yes you would be right, it would be an assumption, forgive me.



true, But then how could Noah know that the water receded then? the leave becomes meaningless if it did not come of a tree..


Same here, and also the statement to know that Noah because of said leaf, knew the water receded..

I am still however, trying to figure out how you think this proves a local flood..
Well that's not the only way I determine the amount of the flood, since scripture doesn't state anything about two by two trees plants etc. being in the ark, with that one can only assume that all plants on the earth where in a bloom state, bearing friut seedlings to produce all the verities around today, that doesn't seem logical at all. Finding a leaf from a olive tree that doesn't produce Friut at least a minimum of three years more so within 5 to 12 years of age. Seems likely to me there was some trees left after the flood to produce another tree/fruit.
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#58

1. Yes a leaf.. It does not change anything though, I never said the vine was dead..
2. I would be assuming if I would say with all certainty that a dove, under today atmospheric conditions. can travel the exact same way the did after the flood... I do not like to base my beliefs on assumptions I am sure you are thee same..





so did it have a motor too? (I am retired US Coast guard.. I have spend many years on the deep oceans so I think I know a thing or two about how a ship that has no power reacts. with or without a rudder. )
Well I was simply responding to your statement that the ark had no maneuvering and how do you know this fact?

As you stated you where in the coast guard, "thanks for serving by the way :)"' but as you know a ship can't maneuver without what a rudder, or sails or paddles ores or modern days a motor.. It's dead in the water toss by the waves to where ever.
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#59
Old Hebrew meaning for earth is erets which can have about ten different ways of using the word depending on context. As someone else had pointed out.


The bible isn't cut and dry on explaination of meanings. I can name so many poor translations not even funny.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#60
Old Hebrew meaning for earth is erets which can have about ten different ways of using the word depending on context. As someone else had pointed out.


The bible isn't cut and dry on explaination of meanings. I can name so many poor translations not even funny.
Yes, I have studied this, What I have found, is just because it does nto HAVE to mean something, does not mean it Does NOT mean something..

we have to take the whole account into context. We can not by itself use it to prove a point,