Let me clarify my position.
1. I only posted in this thread to make a joke about your name, and to give you a bit of a hard time, in fun, for supporting Swaggart.
2. Prior to that, I haven't been posting in this thread because I'm not interested in it; I'm not interested in whatever Swaggart claims as a special revelation.
3. I'm also not interested in parsing through exactly what he says which I AGREE with, and exactly what he says which I DISAGREE with... I'm just not interested.
4. I really have no interest in discussing anything about Swaggart because frankly I just find it impossible to take him seriously.
5. If YOU take him seriously, then that's between you and God, and I'm sure plenty of people will be happy to debate you... but I'm just not interested.
6. Final thought:
Why would I even want to debate the theological atonement views of a guy I consider a total con man?
I don't care what his views are.
Maybe some of his views are ok.
I have no idea.
I'm not interested.
I don't study the works of con men for my theology.
So whether he says something correct or incorrect... I'm just not interested.
If you like him, well that's your choice.
Your choice in theologians is up to you... but don't expect me to be interested.
I only came in here to tease you a bit, in good fun.
Take Care,
Max