Mother Of God?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
41,356
16,320
113
69
Tennessee
Please tell us which Scriptures were not always considered inspired, aside from the apocrypha, which was NOT accepted as Scripture or inspired, even though it was sometimes included in the Bible.

2 Timothy 3:1 says that “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.” This verse tells us that God inspired all Scripture and that it is profitable to us. The apocrypha was not considered inspired, because it does not align with Scripture. For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit. 2 Peter 1:21
That verse is a favorite of mine because it states that all scripture is God-breathed. This includes the Old Testament too. There are those that believe that the God-breathed scripture of the OT is obsolete. Not true. Jesus quoted from the OT many times. At that time there was not yet the written NT.
 

dallasb78

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2015
125
0
16
.
Does the bible state who this divine authority is? I'm sure that there is such an authority, and that God does preserve the authority but a problem for me is how is it known conclusively who this divine appointed authority are. I consider all 66 books of the bible to be spiritually inspired and completely accurate and trustworthy. No, I'm not part of the divine authority just only stating what is evident to myself.
Yes it does. The Church is that authority. (Mt. 16:18-19) Also Christ always promised to be with His church.(Mt. 28:20)

Christ sent His apostles out into the world with authority to teach and heal (Luke 9:1-2) and to forgive sins (John 20:23).
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
41,356
16,320
113
69
Tennessee
Complete garbage!

The RCC is composed of people, fallible people!
The so-called magisterium of the RCC is nothing more than a bunch of blokes (no girls) with man-made titles like Bishop and Pope who make decisions for the RCC.
You claim that they are infallible because of the Holy Spirit is just sophistry!
The SAME Holy Spirit indwells me and I KNOW that I am NOT infallible.

The fiction that the RCC has any kind of authority not available to any other Christian is simply ludicrous....
I'm not infallible either and the Holy Spirit dwells in me also.
 

dallasb78

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2015
125
0
16
The New Testament has always been considered inspired. I am not surprised it took your beloved institution so long to agree with the rest of us. To help you catch up, you may consider this:

The Christian church has always considered the New Testament documents to be inspired. Though in the early church there were some debates on which New Testament books to include in the Bible, God worked through the Christian church to recognize those inspired works. Therefore we now have 27 inspired books for the New Testament.

In 1 Cor. 14:37 Paul said, "If anyone thinks he is a prophet or spiritual, let him recognize that the things which I write to you are the Lord's commandment." In 2 Pet. 3:16, Peter said, "as also in all [Paul's] letters, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction." Also, Jesus said in John 14:26, "But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I said to you." This means that the Lord has commissioned the apostles to accurately record what Jesus had said because the Holy Spirit would be working in them.

So, we can see that Jesus promised direction from the Holy Spirit, that Paul considered what he wrote to be the commands of God, and that Peter recognized Paul's writings as Scripture. https://carm.org/bible-inspired
"Though in the early church there were some debates on which New Testament books to include in the Bible, God worked through the Christian church to recognize those inspired works. Therefore we now have 27 inspired books for the New Testament."

And how do you think they settled this debate? Who had the final authority when disagreements rose among the Bishops? and from where did they get their authority to do so?
 

graceNpeace

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2016
2,180
107
63
Yes it does. The Church is that authority. (Mt. 16:18-19) Also Christ always promised to be with His church.(Mt. 28:20)

Christ sent His apostles out into the world with authority to teach and heal (Luke 9:1-2) and to forgive sins (John 20:23).
Note that Matt 16:18-19 is NOT a reference the RCC.......
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,709
3,650
113
I am no way trying to stir the pot between protestants and Catholics! I'm just really confused. Did I word it Wrong? And how can I say what i said and not be Nestorianism? Thanks.
Tell them she 'mothered' God's Son.
 
L

LPT

Guest
I have never seen a ring kissed in the church by anyone. Maybe the pope?

"Call no man Father" i think that's what your referring to here. This verse is simply stating that we shouldn't honour men more than God. Our Lord is using hyperbole here as well. If he meant this literally then no son or daughter would be allowed to call his/her father "father".

When a priest forgives sins it it not he that forgives them, but God. He(the priest) represents Christ visibly but the real Christ is there invisibly.

Mary is an intercessor between humanity and Christ. Christ is the only intercessor between humanity and God the Father. There were statues in the Temple of God built by Solomon.

I dont' know how many priests you have met but the great majority of them that I have come across are quite humble. More than I can say for some protestant TV preachers.

The Pharisee's problem wasn't a false region so much but that they thought they were saved because of their great knowledge of Scripture.(John 5:39)
You haven't seen because you go to church on Sunday's or what ever and listen to the sermons etc, have you been behind the scenes, they all do it, cardinals bishops etc. kissy kissy my ring is plain stupid. The pope is no better of a religious leader than a homeless man. people cry went a new pope is selected, the stupid smoke thing from the chimney, bunch of quack stuff.

Jesus does not need anyone human to represent Himself, you can freely ask Jesus yourself for forgiveness, and you can have a personal relationship with him as well, that is what he would love to have with people.

The Mary Intercessor thing is solely built around the wedding at Cana, the claim is Mary had compassion on the people thus has become a so called Intercessor, a completely false teaching, Jesus said himself why do you bother me with this stuff woman, the wedding was of a family member and Mary had worldly thoughts of wanting the reception to go smoothly that is all it was nothing more nothing less. Jesus changed the water to wine for a reason and it wasn't for that reason either.

the Pharisees loved the place of honor, the loved to be seen with their fancy robes and hats.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
L

LPT

Guest
This breaks my heart, to see a woman pour out tears like this to man, nothing but modern day Pharisees look at the tall black hats and black robes, people are being lead astray by that religion.

[video=youtube;sg-Jfu7QAvk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sg-Jfu7QAvk[/video]
 

dallasb78

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2015
125
0
16
Nonsense!
Says who?
The RCC....
LOL
Says the Bible(Mt. 16:19:19)(John 16:12-13),

and says the church Fathers:

Ignatius of Antioch

Take note of those who hold heterodox opinions on the grace of Jesus Christ which has come to us, and see how contrary their opinions are to the mind of God. . . . They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, flesh which suffered for our sins and which that Father, in his goodness, raised up again. They who deny the gift of God are perishing in their disputes (Letter to the Smyrnaeans 6:2-7:1 [A.D. 110]).

Irenaeus

But since it would be too long to enumerate in such a volume as this the succession of all the churches, we shall confound all those who, in whatever manner, whether through self-satisfaction or vainglory, or through blindness and wicked opinion, assemble other than where it is proper, by pointing out here the successions of the bishops of the greatest and most ancient church known to all, founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles. Peter and Paul, that church which has the tradition and the faith which comes down to us after having been announced to men by the apostles. With that church, because of its superior origin, all the churches must agree, that is, all the faithful in the whole world, and it is in her that the faithful everywhere have maintained the apostolic tradition (Against Heresies 3:3:2 [A.D. 189]).
 

graceNpeace

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2016
2,180
107
63
Yes it is. It is Our Lord declaring Peter to be the Rock on which the church is built. Peter was the first Pope.
In your delusional world perhaps!
I repeat: this is NOT a reference to the RCC!!!

The RCC did NOT exist until AFTER the Great Schism in 1054!
It could not have because the church in Rome was just part of the wider church.
 

dallasb78

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2015
125
0
16
In your delusional world perhaps!
I repeat: this is NOT a reference to the RCC!!!

The RCC did NOT exist until AFTER the Great Schism in 1054!
It could not have because the church in Rome was just part of the wider church.
See the quotes in post 151, they clearly show the Catholic church and its doctrine existed well before 1054.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
Let us get this straight....

MARY was and is a SINNER saved by GRACE
She was faithful, chosen by GOD to bear JESUS
IS NOT the queen of heaven
HAS NO power to intercede for a flea, much less a man
Is not to be worshiped or prayed to
Has no special power or pull with JESUS
and had numerous children by JOSEPH after JESUS

end of story!
 

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
Dec 20, 2017
9,267
5,626
113
Yes it is. It is Our Lord declaring Peter to be the Rock on which the church is built. Peter was the first Pope.
I wonder what your background is? Have you been Catholic from birth? I was born into a Catholic family. It doesn't take a lot of research to expose that lie about Peter being the first Pope. Be honest with yourself and with God. Dig for the truth please.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
I wonder what your background is? Have you been Catholic from birth? I was born into a Catholic family. It doesn't take a lot of research to expose that lie about Peter being the first Pope. Be honest with yourself and with God. Dig for the truth please.
I cannot imagine anyone could possible say Peter was the first POPE....seeing how it was not until after 300 A.D. that the Catholic Church came online, Peter had long been crucified upside down in ROME and NO WHERE is evidence to be found that proves he was the pope of anything......POPPYCOCK......is exactly what it is....
 

graceNpeace

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2016
2,180
107
63
These quotes aren't made up I assure you. And I'm pretty sure accusing me of lying is against the forum rules.
Do not twist my words!
I know EXACTLY who Irenaeus and Ignatius were and I am familiar with their writings!

They were NOT part of the RCC, period!
 

TruthTalk

Senior Member
Jul 17, 2017
2,904
2,262
113
Mary is the mother of Messiah, in the flesh. Beyond that SHE IS NOTHING SPECIAL!!!! JUST A WOMAN!!! NO BIG DEAL!!!! EQUAL TO ALL SINNERS WHO NEED(ED) SAVED!!!!WE DO NOT PRAY TO HER SHE IS A SINNER SAVED BY GRACE, I AM HERE EQUAL... A SINNER SAVED BY GRACE!!!!!
Thank you mcubed, Yes Mary needed to be born again, she was a sinner whom Jesus had to save through His death, burial and resurrection from the dead. I was waiting all day for someone to make this point; Mary was, "A sinner saved by Grace."...:)


"This is how the birth of Jesus the Messiah came about:" "His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant through the Holy Spirit." Matthew1:18

20) But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit.
21) She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins.” Luke2:20,21
 
Last edited: